Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Journal of SouthEast Asian Human Rights Constitutional Review Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains
Mirza Satria Buana
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Law Politics of 2009’s Presidential Election Act Mirza Satria Buana
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009): English Version
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Normatively, an act, in whatever form in may be, shall be based on the orientation for the the people benefit and to ascertainment of the justice for people. The politics of law of presidential election issued by the relevant body is considered to be conservative and tends to be elitical. On theother hand, the success of Indonesia to exit fron the transition of democracy is determined by the lagal policiy of the govenrment. Through the issuance of act on Presidential election which is responsive,  a better and more democratic new president may be ekected.Keywords : Democracy, Politics Of Law, Presidential Election
Can Human Rights and Indigenous Spirituality Prevail over State-Corporatism? A Narrative of Ecological and Cultural Rights Violation from East Kalimantan, Indonesia Mirza Satria Buana
Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights Vol 1 No 1 (2017): June 2017
Publisher : Jember University Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jseahr.v1i1.5282

Abstract

This article examines both theoretical and empirical discussion on strategies to overcome state-corporatism and developmentalism practices in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. State-corporatism is the term used to describe a political condition when a state has a strong linkage to organized groups. Developmentalism is an over-arching concept to describe a strong tendency of a state to maximize economics growths through investment, while disregarding people’s fundamental rights. East Kalimantan Province is selected because it is highly known as one of the enournous amount of natural resources found within among other provinces in Indonesia. However, the richness of this province has become a curse of its people due to massive destructions of natural resources. This paper seeks to analyse in what way human rights’ principles and indigenous spirituality can lessen the negative effects of ‘development’ projects sustained by state-corporatism. This article contemplates what strategies that can be executed to diminish state-corporatism effects in East Kalimantan, particularly in two important districts: Regency of Kutai Kartanegara and Bontang Municipality. This article argues that the indigenous spirituality is a key to battle state-corporatism’s influences. Indigenous spirituality as forum internum is still a potential tool of advocacy. By capitalizing the role of shamans, indigenous peoples might still have opportunities to reclaim and defend their cultural rights.
Weak-Form Review and Judicial Independence: A Comparative Perspective Mirza Satria Buana
Constitutional Review Vol. 10 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/consrev1023

Abstract

This article examines the Court’s judicial review power that has gradually shifted from a strong-form review into a weak-form review. The shifting into weak-form review may affect judicial independence, both de facto or de jure, because Justices have considered the Legislature’s responds on the Court’s decisions. This approach diminishes the Court’s supremacy toward lawmakers. This article explores comparative insights from various countries that utilize those reviews, notably the United States of America (strong review), and commonwealth countries (weak review). It also elaborates on some ‘anomalies’ from both reviews. It raises two important questions: what insights can be learned from other countries’ judicial practices, particularly on the use of weak- form review? And, does weak-form review suitable to be enforced in Indonesia’s context? The weak review that is manifested in conditional decisions claims to be more politically palatable. Despite that strategic reason, the practice of conditional decision is prone to misuse as it could decrease constitutionalism and judicial independence. This paper argues that the weak-form review is not suitable for Indonesia’s constitutional law context, because the country lacks prerequisites and preconditions of strong control through parliament. The Indonesian Constitutional Court must return to its genuine authority as a strong-form review to strengthen legal constitutionalism.
Dilema Sistem Merit sebagai Instrumen Pencegahan Korupsi, Kolusi, dan Nepotisme dalam Pengisian Jabatan di Pemerintahan Daerah: The Dilemma of the Merit System as an Instrument to Prevent Corruption, Collusion, and Nepotism in Local Government Appointments Maisarah; Mirza Satria Buana
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 5: Mei 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i5.7539

Abstract

Tulisan ini menganalisis dilema penerapan sistem merit sebagai instrumen pencegahan korupsi, kolusi, dan nepotisme (KKN) dalam pengisian jabatan di pemerintahan daerah. Sistem merit, yang secara normatif menjadi fondasi utama tata kelola ASN berbasis kompetensi dan kinerja, kerap kali dihadapkan pada realitas lemahnya pengawasan dan intervensi politik. Pembubaran Komisi Aparatur Sipil Negara (KASN) melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara memperparah kondisi tersebut dengan menimbulkan kekosongan dalam mekanisme pengawasan eksternal. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif dengan metode analisis deskriptif, melalui studi pustaka terhadap regulasi yang berlaku dan studi kasus praktik di daerah. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa sistem merit masih rentan dimanipulasi, terutama dalam konteks budaya birokrasi daerah yang sarat patronase politik. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan kerangka regulasi dan pengawasan serta integrasi nilai-nilai etika birokrasi untuk memastikan sistem merit benar-benar menjadi penghalang KKN.
Dinamika Politik Hukum dalam Kabinet Gemuk Kementerian di Indonesia: Dynamics of Legal Politics in the Fat Cabinet of Ministries in Indonesia Muhammad Ridha Ramadhan; Mirza Satria Buana
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 5: Mei 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i5.7541

Abstract

Penelitian ini berjudul Dinamika Politik Hukum dalam Kabinet Gemuk Kementerian di Indonesia, yang bertujuan untuk menelaah kesesuaian frasa sesuai kebutuhan dalam pengaturan jumlah kementerian dengan prinsip good governance, serta menilai urgensi pengaturan jumlah kementerian secara lebih konkret dan eksplisit dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat deskriptif-analitis dengan pendekatan terhadap konstitusi, undang-undang, peraturan pelaksana, dan putusan pengadilan yang relevan. Peneliti juga mengkaji teori hukum, politik hukum, dan prinsip-prinsip good governance seperti efisiensi, efektivitas, akuntabilitas, dan transparansi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan frasa "sesuai kebutuhan" dalam pengaturan jumlah kementerian memberikan ruang interpretasi yang luas, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakjelasan dalam penerapannya. Frasa ini tidak cukup spesifik untuk memastikan pembentukan kementerian baru dapat mendukung prinsip-prinsip good governance.
Urgensi Ratifikasi Statuta Roma Sebagai Solusi Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat: Urgency of Ratification of the Rome Statute as a Solution to Resolving Serious Human Rights Violations Ahmad Maulana; Mirza Satria Buana
Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Vol. 8 No. 6: Juni 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/jks.v8i6.7732

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji urgensi ratifikasi Statuta Roma oleh Indonesia dalam rangka memperkuat penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran hak asasi manusia berat. Statuta Roma yang menjadi dasar Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (ICC) menawarkan prinsip complementarity yang memungkinkan intervensi internasional jika sistem hukum nasional tidak mampu atau tidak bersedia mengadili pelaku kejahatan berat secara adil. Namun, Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan HAM di Indonesia hanya mengadopsi sebagian yurisdiksi ICC, tanpa mencakup kejahatan perang dan agresi. Penelitian ini menyoroti kelemahan sistem hukum nasional dalam menyelesaikan kasus pelanggaran HAM masa lalu, seperti penghilangan paksa tahun 1998, serta menekankan pentingnya harmonisasi hukum nasional dengan standar internasional untuk mencegah impunitas dan meningkatkan akuntabilitas. Kajian ini merekomendasikan ratifikasi Statuta Roma sebagai langkah strategis dalam reformasi hukum dan perlindungan HAM di Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ahmad Maulana Maisarah Muhammad Ridha Ramadhan