Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ABK INDONESIA DI KAPAL ASING DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM NASIONAL Daniel Surianto; Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.12034

Introduction: Indonesian crew members are every Indonesian citizen who will be, are currently or have been doing work by receiving wages on a foreign ship. In its development, there have been many cases of Indonesian ship crew working on foreign ships such as violence, torture, unpaid wages and so on. This study aims to determine the role of the government in providing legal protection against cases experienced by the crew of Indonesian ships when they are, are or have worked on foreign ships in the perspective of national law. Methods: Normative juridical research uses a normative juridical approach based on primary and secondary legal materials. Result: The data shows that there are a number of complaints and cases of Indonesian Ship Crew members working on foreign ships. Conclusion: This research shows that the regulations in the form of laws and regulations and the policies of the Indonesian government in providing protection are good, but it is still necessary to form policies and regulations that do not overlap, there is a lack of cooperation between related ministries / institutions in overcoming trafficking in persons against citizens Indonesia, the lack of oversight from law enforcement officials in terms of recruitment to reviewing the places where ship crew companies work, and the lack of data on the number of Indonesian crew members working on foreign ships.

ANALISIS POLEMIK EUTHANASIA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA (PERBANDINGAN EUTHANASIA DI INDONESIA DAN BELANDA) Natasha Grace; Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.17923

Euthanasia is very debatable whether it has to be legalized in Indonesia. Every human being has the right to life. But there is a new idea about human rights. It is called the right to die. A patient in a terminal state should not suffer from their unbearable pain whilst waiting for death. Euthanasia is a medical procedure helping patients with terminal state to die peacefully without any pain. Active euthanasia is illegal in Indonesia according to Article 344 Indonesia’s Penal Code. Passive euthanasia is still allowed in Indonesia according to Minister of Health Regulation Number 37 Year 2014. Euthanasia is allowed in some countries. The Netherlands is the first country in the world to legalized euthanasia. According to The Netherlands Government, to let someone suffer an unbearable pain and in agony whilst waiting for death is very inhuman. Every person has the right to die in peace and without pain. On the other hand, it is against the right to life to do euthanasia on a terminal patient. The function of this research is to compare regulations about euthanasia in Indonesia and The Netherlands and to decide the borderlines of euthanasia in Indonesia. This study uses normative method and qualitative analysis while using statute and comparative approach. The result of the study shows the pros and cons of euthanasia and whether it has to be legalized in Indonesia.

PENGUSIRAN MASSAL PENGUNGSI AFRIKA UTARA DARI JERMAN DAN PERMASALAHANNYA Gibson Radityo; Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2200

United Nation High Commissioner of Refugee (UNHCR) is an internasional organization made under United Nations (UN) specifically for asylum seeker and refugee issues. As an international organization, UNHCR have a legal personality which is give them power to do such a legal action, yet from that power make UNHCR also gets its rights and respondsibility. According to UNHCR statute, Vienna Convention 1951 and Protocol 1967, one of UNHCR respondsibility is to protect and keep the refugee safe and make sure the third parties nation do all the responsibility to keep and protect the refugee. But how, if there is an issue that a nation break the international convention for refugee by force the refugee back to their home, yet the refugees already proved to do crimes againts the third parties nation policy? yet if the refugees forced back to their origin couuntry, they will be threathened, so how suppose the UNHCR as an international organization for refugee do according to the UNHCR statute and Convention of refugees?in that case it will give a responsibility for UNHCR to solve the issue for the refugee. As the case above, the author have an insterest to summarizes the issue as my thesis.

TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN PEJABAT DIPLOMATIK MENURUT KONVENSI WINA 1961 (CONTOH KASUS PENYERANGAN DUTA BESAR RUSIA DI TURKI) Yonathan Yogy; Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2203

The establishment of diplomatic relations aims to strengthen a relationships between state. The establishment of diplomatic relations is based on mutual consent between two states. After consent has been reached, each state can dispatch members of the mission .The function of a member of the missions is to represent the sending state, to protect the interests of the sending state and its nationals, to negotiate, Ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving State, and to promote friendly relations between the sending country and the receiving country. The Vienna Convention 1961 on diplomatic relations provides immunity and privilege to members of the missions in carrying out diplomatic functions . Such immunity and privilege are granted not for personal gain, it is provided to facilitate members of the missions in performing diplomatic functions. One of the forms of immunity is Inviolability. Inviolability of members of the missions is regulated by Article 29 of Vienna Convention 1961. Article 29 stated that the receiving state shall take appropriate measures to prevent any attack on members of the missions. But if the receiving state fails to protect the members of the missions, is there any legal consequence and state’s responsibility ?. The author is interested to raise the issue into a thesis.

TANGGUNG JAWAB INDONESIA TERHADAP PENCARI SUAKA INTERNASIONAL BERDASARKAN PRINSIP KEMANUSIAAN (STUDI KASUS PENCARI SUAKA INTERNASIONAL DI KALIDERES JAKARTA BARAT) Muhammad Gani Lukita; Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10620

The problem of asylum seekers and refugees is a matter of human rights (HAM), as well as a problem in international law. In 1951 the United Nations created The Convention Relating Status of Refugees 1951 (Convention Concerning the Status of Refugees 1951). Therefore, the Perpers regarding the Handling of Refugees from Abroad No. 125 of 2016. Even though this Perpres has been issued, it is still unable to complete the handling of asylum seekers and refugees in Indonesia, especially international asylum seekers in Kalideres, West Jakarta, where the asylum seekers are Not getting enough attention from the government. The formulation of the problem in writing this journal is How the responsibility of the Indonesian government in handling asylum seekers in Kalideres is seen from humanitarian principles. In this paper, the method used is a normative research method in which the author approaches legal principles. In this study the authors use legal sources, namely: the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 1999 concerning Foreign Relations, Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration and Perpers regarding the Handling of Refugees from Outside. Negeri No. 125/2016, as well as The Convention Relating Status of Refugees 1951. From those problems, the authors conclude that the handling of asylum seekers and refugees is an obligation for the Indonesian government, because human rights are an obligation mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and international law.

ANALISIS YURIDIS PERJANJIAN EKSTRADISI ANTARA PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA DENGAN PEMERINTAH DIRAJA MALAYSIA (STUDI KASUS: DJOKO SOEGIARTO TJANDRA) Fikhri Sultan Maulana Fadjar Daulat; Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i1.10990

Along with the increasingly rapid development of the times, crime also develops rapidly. In some cases the crime does not only occur within the country, but also occurs at home and abroad, which of course will involve other countries in its implementation. Crimes involving many countries are known as crimes with international dimensions or can also be referred to as transnational crimes. Therefore, in order to overcome this, the extradition mechanism appears as an institution that is expected to be able to prevent and eradicate crimes with an international dimension quickly and effectively. However, the implementation of the extradition mechanism actually raises various polemics and dilemmas, where many of the cases with an international dimension cannot be resolved by the extradition mechanism, so this makes the existence of the extradition mechanism begin to be questioned, namely whether the extradition mechanism is truly capable of dealing with crimes with international dimensions. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out an in-depth analysis and study to find out the causes of the inability of the extradition mechanism to eradicate crimes with an international dimension, so that an evaluation of the extradition mechanism can be carried out so that the fight against crimes with an international dimension will be better in the future.

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN MYANMAR ATAS TINDAKAN GENOSIDA TERHADAP KELOMPOK ETNIS ROHINGYA BERDASARKAN GENOCIDE CONVENTION 1948 Intan Ghina Maurizka; Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i2.10600

The United Nations states that the act of genocide is a denial of the right to the existence of all human groups who are very conscience of mankind, resulting in great harm to mankind and contrary to moral law and the spirit and purpose of the United Nations. It has been 72 years since the adoption of the Genocide Convention, but these crimes are repeated today, such as the acts of genocide presented by the Rohingya Ethnic Group in Myanmar. Myanmar is a member country and has ratified the Genocide Convention. So as a state party to the convention, it must carry out its obligations, namely to prevent and punish acts of genocide. However, the actions taken by Myanmar as a member state are contrary to its obligations in all its capabilities to prevent and punish the crime of genocide. Researchers investigate these problems with normative legal research. The data investigates that Myanmar has responsibility for its actions and should make reparations.

Sengketa Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia di Kawasan Ambalat Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 2 No. 2 (2009): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 2 Nomor 2 Tahun 2009
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

Penetapan batas maritim suatu negara pantai dengan negara yang berhadapan maupun negara yang berdampingan tentunya perlu untuk segera diselesaikan. Begitu juga denga Negara Indonesia yang merupakan negara pantai. Penetapan batas maritim akan membawa konsekuensi kepada yurisdiksi, hak berdaulat dan kedaulatan suatu negara. Demikian juga dengan penetapan batas maritim antara Negara Indonesia dan Negara Malaysia di Kawasan Ambalat perlu dilakukan serangkaian tindakan-tindakan atau langkah-langkah yang mengarah kepada penyelesaian sengketa, mengingat Kawasan Ambalat termasuk ke dalam Kedaulatan Negara Indonesia dan pada sisi lain Negara Malaysia sudah melakukan tindakan yang menyimpang.

Pengaturan Perundang-undangan Nasional Terkait dengan Penetapan Indonesia Sebagai Negara Kepulauan Ida Kurnia
Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS Vol. 2 No. 4 (2010): Jurnal Hukum Prioris Volume 2 Nomor 4 Tahun 2010
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Trisakti University

KHL 1982 tentang Hukum Laut yang telah diratifikasi oleh Indoensia dengan Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 1985, sangat penting karena telah memberikan landasan hukum bagi kedudukan Indonesia sebagai negara Kepulauan. Sebagai konsekuensi lebih lanjut Indonesia mempunyai kewajiban untuk segera mengimplementasikan ketentuan-ketentuan hukum tersebut ke dalam peraturan perundang-undangan nasioal. Untuk itu pada tanggal 18 Agustus 1996, Pemerintah Indonesia telah mengundangkan Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 1996 tentang Perairan Indonesia. Undang-Undang ini merupakan pengganti dari Undang-Undang No. 4 Perpu Tahun 1960 tentang Perairan Indonesia dan sekaligus sebagai landasan hukum serta merupakan langkah nyata dari pengimplementasian KHL 1982 tentang Hukum Laut, khususnya ketentuan tentang Negara Kepulauan.

TELAAH KRITIS TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN FREEDOM OF SPEECH DALAM HONGKONG SECURITY LAW DITINJAU BERDASARKAN DEKLARASI BERSAMA TIONGKOK – INGGRIS 1984 (SINO-BRITISH JOINT DECLARATION 1984) Madeleine Lie; Ida Kurnia
Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol. 20 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law - Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

The Sino-British Joint Declaration was a declaration that was signed by Great Britain and China in 1984 in other to discusses about Hongkong which was under British control at that time where British gave Hongkong to China as the part of 99 year lease, but it ended up in disaster after the Hongkong's 2020 National Security Law.The type of research that the author uses is normative where this research refers to international regulations that apply in international relations, court decisions, and norms that apply in international relations.Based on the studies that have been carried out and based on expert opinions and theories that have been put forward, it can be concluded that China violated the contents of the Sino-British Joint Declaration which protects the principle of Freedom of Speech in Hongkong with the ratification of the Hongkong National Security Law.Based on the conclusions above, the authors provide the following suggestions, the Chinese government must carry out International Responsibility by revising the Hong Kong National Security Law both in substance (to avoid rubber articles such as Article 29 point 5) and the process of making the law to follow the law-making procedures in force in Hong Kong.

Title

Found 12 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 12 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 12 Documents
Search