Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal INSANIA

Kepemimpinan Pendidikan: Tinjauan terhadap Teori Sifat dan Tingkah-laku Muflihin, Muh. Hizbul
INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan Vol 13 No 1 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2791.188 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/insania.v13i1.286

Abstract

The substance of education is learning activity. The key of education successfulness is correlation and interaction between teacher and headmaster as top level leader at school. The ability or competence of school leader (headmaster) to develop teacher spirit or other employee is depending on character and ways shown to them. Its mean that good manner and how to treat other team-member has significant effect to his success to implement leadership at school. Education leader, at every level—headmaster, vice, teacher or other official—must able to play role as EMASLIM; namely educator, manager, administrator, supervisor, leader, innovator, and motivator.
Penilaian Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Muflihin, Muh. Hizbul
INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan Vol 14 No 2 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1419.861 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/insania.v14i2.336

Abstract

it’s an obligatory to measure individual performance at an organization. From that we will know whether task is conducted by individual, and whether result work productivity. This work productivity measuring is an effort to ensure employee or personal have do their task with certain standards. This evaluation result can be used as basis for reward or punishment. There are several methods to value employee performance, namely Checklist method and Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS). Checklist method have simplicity on application, but prone to evaluator bias. Whereas BARS method is more adequate, because based on employee active participation, but not every performance domain can be valued with this method.