Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.888
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas: Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafiiyah Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie
Syarif Fadillah
Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN SISTEM BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN TERBALIK DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Bagus Surya Prabowo; Syarif Fadillah
VERITAS Vol 7 No 1 (2021): VERITAS
Publisher : Jurnal Program Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/veritas.v7i1.1176

Abstract

Corruption crimes always turn out to be more neat and difficult to reveal, thus demanding changes in the system that capable of eradicating corruption to its roots. And one of the changes is the implementation of a reversed burden of proof system that makes it easier for prosecutors to reveal the criminal elements in a corruption case. Even though it has been included in positive law, in practice this proof is not fully applied and there are still obstacles in its application. This study seeks to answer in what cases this reverse burden of proof is applied and what are the obstacles in its application. This research concludes that the reversal burden of proof system in Indonesia is applied only to criminal acts of gratification whose nominal value is above Rp. 10 million and is used to confiscate the property of the defendant who has not been charged by the prosecutor. Meanwhile, the obstacles to implementing a system of reversal burden of proof are 1) the existence of a judicial mafia, 2) a legal culture that has not yet adapted to the new system, and 3) reverse burden of proof is not clearly regulated in Indonesian law. Abstrak Kejahatan korupsi selalu berubah menjadi lebih rapih dan sulit diungkap sehingga menuntut adanya perubahan sistem yang mampu untuk memberantas korupsi sampai keakarnya. Dan salah satu perubahan itu adalah dengan penerapan sistem beban pembuktian terbalik yang memudahkan jaksa untuk mengungkap unsur pidana dalam sebuah kasus korupsi. Meskipun sudah dicantumkan didalam hukum positif, namun dalam praktiknya pembuktian ini tidak diterapkan secara menyeluruh serta masih ada hambatan dalam penerapannya. Penelitian ini berupaya menjawab dalam kasus apa saja beban pembuktian terbalik ini diterapkan serta apa saja hambatan dalam penerapannya. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan sistem beban pembuktian terbalik di Indonesia dilaksanakan hanya pada tindak pidana gratifikasi yang nominalnya diatas Rp 10 juta serta digunakan untuk perampasan harta terdakwa yang belum didakwakan jaksa. Sedangkan hambatan penerapan sistem beban pembuktian terbalik yaitu 1) adanya mafia peradilan, 2) budaya hukum yang belum beradaptasi dengan sistem baru, dan 3) pembuktian terbalik tidak diatur secara jelas dalam undang-undang.
LEGAL REVIEW OF GREEN ZONE VIOLATION AT AGRICULTURAL LAND FUNCTIONAL SHIFT ACCORDING TO LOKAL REGULATION KABUPATEN BEKASI NO. 12/2011 OF KABUPATEN BEKASI STAKE LAYOUT PLAN Iwan Setiyono; Syarif Fadillah; Siti Nur Intihani
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Penerapan Hukum Pada Masa Covid-19
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v4i1.88

Abstract

Jurisdictional Review of Green Zone Violations on the Transfer of Agricultural Land Function According to Bekasi Regency Regional Regulation Number 12 of 2011 aims to determine the regulation of land transfer according to Law Number 41 of 2009 on Protection of Sustainable Food Agricultural Land, knowing the transfer of agricultural land function in Bekasi Regency in relation to the arrangement of the Spatial Planning of Bekasi Regency and to determine the legal consequences of the violation of the Transfer of Function of Agricultural Land in relation to not meeting the requirements that have been set. This thesis research uses a normative juridical approach, data sources used, sources and types of data are focused on secondary data that includes legal materials and legal documents including legal cases that are the basis of researchers in order to answer problems and research objectives. Data collection techniques rely on secondary data. The analysis of the data used is done in a qualitative normative manner based on the norms or rules of law and doctrines relevant to the problem. The results of the study showed, First, Bekasi Regency for the improvement of the making of Perda RTRW (Regional Spatial Plan) and the implementation of PERDA No. 12 of 2011 has not been implemented well as seen from the rapid transfer of land functions in Bekasi Regency, this is supported by the lack of public awareness on the importance of sustainable food agricultural land protection, coupled with the lack of repressive action by local governments and law enforcement officers to give effect. jera cause the protection of sustainable food agricultural land is impressed only of a preventive nature. Second, the rapid shift in land function in Bekasi Regency is due to the dynamics of urban growth, demographics and economy, in addition, lack of support for local government policies to maintain agricultural land, weaknesses in regulatory aspects, there is no local regulation regarding thedetailed plan of spatial planning and special regional regulations related to Sustainable Food Agricultural Land (LP2B) so as to open up opportunities for the transfer of agricultural land functions. Therefore, it is necessary to immediately make a spatial map of agricultural land based on GIS (Geographic Information System) as part of maintaining green land in Bekasi Regency.
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CRIMINAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ON PROHIBITED DRUG LIST G ABUSE IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY Masyur Mansyur; Wiryanto Wiryanto; Syarif Fadillah
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): PROTECTION OF CHILDREN AND PROHIBITION OF DRAG USE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v5i1.115

Abstract

Research on the Effectiveness of Criminal Law Enforcement Against Abuse of Illegal Drugs List G in the Perspective of Legal Certainty. This study aims to analyze how law enforcement against drug abuse of list G according to criminal law; to analyze the law enforcement policy on drug abuse of list G in the future. The research methods used in obtaining the data or materials in the study include: normative legal research. This research uses a statutory approach. This research is descriptive analytical and literature. The data analysis technique used is that all primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials are collected, then the legal material is processed qualitatively with a statute approach, namely reviewing legislation to answer legal issues that have been formulated. The results of this study are law enforcement against perpetrators who abuse List G drugs by consuming wrongly so that they become addicts to List G drugs can be charged with Articles 197 and 198 of the Health Law with a maximum penalty of 15 years and a maximum fine of Rp. 1,500,000,000 (one billion five hundred million rupiah) for people who abuse it, whether it's producing, distributing, and selling list G drugs without a doctor's prescription. In addition, the perpetrators of drug abuse on list G can also be charged with Article 114 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics which states that: that any person without rights or against the law owns, keeps, controls or provides narcotics class I non-plants, shall be punished with imprisonment for a minimum of 4 (four) years and a maximum of 12 (twelve) years and a minimum fine of Rp 800,000,000 , - (eight hundred million rupiah) and a maximum of Rp 8,000,000,000 (eight billion rupiah); and future criminal law policies against drug abusers of List G are given through PERMENKES No 7/2018 which classifies one of the list G drugs that is often misused, namely Karisoprodol as Narcotics Category I. In other words, law enforcement against abusers of Karisoprodol uses Law 35/2009. For producers and dealers there are sanctions in accordance with the provisions in Law 35/2009 and for Karisoprodol addicts have the same rights as narcotics users, namely to get the right to rehabilitation, but the agency states that Permekes 7/2018 cannot be applied because of inadequate facilities and infrastructure to carry out law enforcement.
Pertanggung Jawaban Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 88/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Jkt.Pst) Mukshin Kilwo; mulyono Suwerjo; Syarif Fadillah
Jurnal Hukum Jurisdictie Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34005/jhj.v8i1.244

Abstract

Tindak pidana penggelapan merupakan suatu tindak pidana yang berhubungan dengan masalah moral ataupun mental dan suatu kepercayaan atas kejujuran seseorang. Oleh karena itu tindak pidana ini bermula dari adanya suatu kepercayaan pihakyang dilakukan oleh pelaku tindak pidana penggelapan tersebut. Tindak pidana penggelapan adalah salah satu jenis kejahatan terhadap kekayaan manusia yang diatur di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Pidana (KUHP). Pada rumusan masalah tersebut Bagaimana proses penegakan hukum tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan berdasarkan putusan nomor:88/Pid.B/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst dan Bagaimana pertimbangan hukum oleh majelis hakim dalam penjatuhan putusan terhadap tindak pidana penggelapan dalam menggunakan jabatan (Putusan Nomor : 88/Pid.B/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst). Metode Penelitian yang digunakan ialah tipe penelitian tergolong hukum normatif. Teknik Pengumpulan data dan Teknik Analisi Data ialah Analisis Deskriptif. Pendekatan Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Dalam hasil penelitian bahwa proses penegakkan hukum dan proses pertanggung jawaban hukum serta pertimbangan hukum majelis hakim dalam penjatuhan putusan sesuai dengan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum pidana dan Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Pada putusan tersebut Terdakwa mengakui kesalahan yang ia perbuat dan menyesal atas perbuatannya.
Co-Authors Bagus Surya Prabowo Iwan Setiyono Masyur Mansyur Mukshin Kilwo Mulyono Suwerjo Siti Nur Intihani Wiryanto Wiryanto