Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.042
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Justiciabelen Masyarakat Berdaya dan Inovasi IJ3PE Aloha International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advancement (AIJMU) Rechstaat Nieuw : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Abdimas Mahakam
Wahyuni Safitri
Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda
Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Nursing Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PENERAPAN PRINSIP GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCEPADA KOPERASI MODERN Wahyuni Safitri
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): Februari
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v18i1.3899

Abstract

Modern cooperatives are increasingly required to implement professional, transparent, andaccountable governance in response to the growing complexity of business activities andpublic accountability. This study aims to examine the implementation of Good CorporateGovernance (GCG) principles within the Indonesian cooperative legal systemandtoformulate an ideal model for strengthening GCG-based regulation and cooperativegovernance. This research employs normative legal research methods using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, through an analysis of Law Number 25 of 1992onCooperatives, its implementing regulations, and legal doctrines on corporate governance. The findings reveal that the principles of GCG have been normatively accommodatedintheIndonesian cooperative legal framework, particularly through economic democracy, theresponsibilities of cooperative management, and accountability mechanisms withinthegeneral meeting of members. However, such regulation remains implicit, fragmented, andlacks comprehensive governance standards comparable to those applied in modern corporateentities. Furthermore, this study proposes that an ideal model for strengthening GCG-basedcooperative regulation and governance should be developed through the reformof cooperative legislation that explicitly incorporates the principles of transparency, accountability, responsibility, independence, and fairness; the enhancement of the roles andprofessionalism of cooperative organs; and the establishment of modern cooperativegovernance guidelines aligned with cooperative values and identity. This model is expectedto promote legally sound, ef iciently managed, and sustainable cooperatives with enhancedcompetitiveness within the national economic system
Teknik Penyusunan Peraturan Desa di Desa Manunggal Jaya Kecamatan Tenggarong Seberang, Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara Wahyuni Safitri; Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Jurnal Abdimas Mahakam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Januari
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/jam.v3i1.412

Abstract

Peraturan Desa tidak diatur dalam Undang-undang No.12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan tetapi pembentukan peraturan Desa diatur dengan Permendagri Nomor 111 Tahun 2014.  Adapun jenis peraturan di Desa ada 3 (tiga) yaitu : Peraturan Desa, Peraturan Bersama Kepala Desa dan Peraturan Kepala Desa. Pembentukan peraturan di Desa melalui tahapan : perencanaan, penyusunan, pembahasan, penetapan, pengundangan, penyebarluasan, evaluasi dan klarifikasi. Teknik penyusunan peraturan di Desa diatur dengan pasal 32 Permendagri No.111 Tahun 2014 tentang ketentuan mengenai teknik  penyusunan peraturan di Desa dan keputusan Kepala Desa sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan ketentuan teknis lebih lanjut mengenai tata cara penyusunan peraturan di Desa diatur dalam Peraturan Bupati/Walikota. Kerangka Penyusunan peraturan perundang-undangan mencakup Judul, Pembukaan, Batang Tubuh, Penutup, Penjelasan (jika diperlukan) dan lampiran (jika diperlukan).
Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Debitur Ingkar Janji oleh BPSK Samarinda dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Konsumen Feby Soviani Stiawati; Wahyuni Safitri
International Journal of Politic, Public Policy and Environmental Issues Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Oktober
Publisher : Wadah Inovasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53622/ij3pei.v4i2.382

Abstract

Consumer disputes between defaulting bank debtors and banks are a crucial issue in consumer protection within the financial services sector. This research aims to examine the efforts and obstacles faced by the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (BPSK) of Samarinda City in resolving such disputes, viewed through Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Employing a normative juridical research method supplemented by interview data, this study analyzes BPSK's authority, procedures, and challenges. The findings indicate that BPSK Samarinda endeavors to resolve these disputes, particularly through mediation. BPSK facilitates dialogue between consumers (debtors) and business actors (banks), provides education, and guides the parties toward achieving amicable, win-win solution agreements according to established procedures. However, BPSK encounters significant constraints, including potential jurisdictional overlap with other financial sector dispute resolution bodies (LAPS-SJK), limitations in the legal basis specifically governing its authority in the banking sector, late reporting by consumers after enforcement actions (auctions), and insufficient public awareness, sometimes coupled with delayed responsiveness from business actors. Although BPSK serves as an accessible and low-cost alternative dispute resolution mechanism, strengthening its legal foundation and conducting massive outreach are necessary to enhance its effectiveness in handling complex banking disputes.
Co-Authors Andriany Widie Astuti Chintya Nora Ningsih Desma Eka Putri Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie Faradina Alya Safira Feby Soviani Stiawati Hardiansyah Hardiansyah Hardiansyah Heidy Olha Wuaten Izziyana, Wafda Vivid Karina Lizwary Maryanto Maryanto Megawati Hairuni Nainuri Suhadi Rustiana Yolanda Mustika Wati