Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.467
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ius Constituendum Unes Law Review Jurnal Hukum Adigama Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum AL-SULTHANIYAH
Christine S.T. Kansil
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 36 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Unes Law Review

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Youtuber Atas Publikasi Video yang Telah Dimonetisasi Pendistribusian Royalti oleh Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Vernando Samosir, Anju Doli; Christine S.T. Kansil
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1635

Abstract

The existence of regulations regarding Collective Management Institutions (LMK) in Law 28/2014 and the existence of monetization on YouTube should prevent YouTubers from copyright violations, because Article 87 of Law 28/2014 regulates that the use of works and/or is not considered a violation of Law 28/2014. Related Rights products commercially by users as long as the user has carried out and fulfilled the obligations in accordance with the agreement with LMK. However, there is one very interesting case to be studied in Decision 41PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 where the Defendant is the creator and owner of video content through the account/channel of YouTuber Gen Halilintar which has been monetized and has paid royalties to LMK, namely Wahana Musik Indonesia (WAMI) was sued by PT Nagaswara Publisherindo which is the copyright holder of a song creation (music and lyrics) entitled "Lagi Syantik" "Ciptaan". The purpose of writing this article is to find out and describe YouTubers' legal protection for video publications that have been monetized for distribution of royalties by LMK (Study Decision No. 41PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021). The research method used is normative legal research. The results and conclusions show that legal protection is given to YouTubers who have monetized and paid royalties to their creators through LMK but must still pay attention to moral rights over the creation, namely by not making modifications to the creator's work.
Pelanggaran Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Indonesia Terkait Penyelewengan Wewenang Pejabat Kepolisian Christine S.T. Kansil; Sheren Regina Vedora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1936

Abstract

The state has the right to govern its territory and citizens, but this cannot be done without the assistance of state institutions. One such institution that helps in the administration of governance is the Indonesian National Police, whose duties are regulated by Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002. In carrying out their duties, the Indonesian National Police have a code of ethics as a guide for their members to reflect the comprehensive character of a police officer. However, as time progresses, changes occur in the ethics and morality of police members, which led to the establishment of Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Tentang Kode Etik Profesi dan Komisi Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Violations of this code, particularly by high-ranking officials, such as the case of Teddy Minahasa, a former high-ranking police officer, hinder the enforcement of law. Therefore, it is crucial for the Indonesian National Police to follow and practice ethics in their duties, such as state ethics, institutional ethics, community ethics, and personal ethics. By adhering to these ethics, it is hoped that police members can carry out their duties with commitment, honesty, and high responsibility, for the safety, welfare, and unity of the nation. However, to address these violations, it is necessary to enforce the law firmly and to continuously prevent and cultivate police members to understand and internalize these ethics in every aspect of their life and duties.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perilaku Aparatur Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Tatanan Administrasi Negara Christine S.T. Kansil; Nethania Aurelia Madelin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1937

Abstract

State officials are people who are used as instruments in government. Even though it has been regulated in the law regarding Government Administration, in practice there are still many problems that hinder it. The behavior of state officials who tend to abuse their authority is a problem that hinders the proper running of government administration. This paper aims to reduce the problems caused by several state officials who tend to abuse their authority. In Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001, it is written that an official who commits an act of corruption because he abuses the authority of his position, resulting in harm to the state, then this behavior constitutes an abuse of the authority of his position. The method used in this writing is normative and quantitative. Apart from that, this research uses legislation and case decisions as a primary legal material approach and literature studies as a secondary legal material approach. Article 17 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law No. 3 of 2014 regulates the prohibition of abuse of authority, where government officials are prohibited from abusing their authority.
Perlindungan Hukum Youtuber Atas Publikasi Video yang Telah Dimonetisasi Pendistribusian Royalti oleh Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Vernando Samosir, Anju Doli; Christine S.T. Kansil
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1635

Abstract

The existence of regulations regarding Collective Management Institutions (LMK) in Law 28/2014 and the existence of monetization on YouTube should prevent YouTubers from copyright violations, because Article 87 of Law 28/2014 regulates that the use of works and/or is not considered a violation of Law 28/2014. Related Rights products commercially by users as long as the user has carried out and fulfilled the obligations in accordance with the agreement with LMK. However, there is one very interesting case to be studied in Decision 41PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 where the Defendant is the creator and owner of video content through the account/channel of YouTuber Gen Halilintar which has been monetized and has paid royalties to LMK, namely Wahana Musik Indonesia (WAMI) was sued by PT Nagaswara Publisherindo which is the copyright holder of a song creation (music and lyrics) entitled "Lagi Syantik" "Ciptaan". The purpose of writing this article is to find out and describe YouTubers' legal protection for video publications that have been monetized for distribution of royalties by LMK (Study Decision No. 41PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021). The research method used is normative legal research. The results and conclusions show that legal protection is given to YouTubers who have monetized and paid royalties to their creators through LMK but must still pay attention to moral rights over the creation, namely by not making modifications to the creator's work.
Pelanggaran Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Indonesia Terkait Penyelewengan Wewenang Pejabat Kepolisian Christine S.T. Kansil; Sheren Regina Vedora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1936

Abstract

The state has the right to govern its territory and citizens, but this cannot be done without the assistance of state institutions. One such institution that helps in the administration of governance is the Indonesian National Police, whose duties are regulated by Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002. In carrying out their duties, the Indonesian National Police have a code of ethics as a guide for their members to reflect the comprehensive character of a police officer. However, as time progresses, changes occur in the ethics and morality of police members, which led to the establishment of Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Tentang Kode Etik Profesi dan Komisi Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Violations of this code, particularly by high-ranking officials, such as the case of Teddy Minahasa, a former high-ranking police officer, hinder the enforcement of law. Therefore, it is crucial for the Indonesian National Police to follow and practice ethics in their duties, such as state ethics, institutional ethics, community ethics, and personal ethics. By adhering to these ethics, it is hoped that police members can carry out their duties with commitment, honesty, and high responsibility, for the safety, welfare, and unity of the nation. However, to address these violations, it is necessary to enforce the law firmly and to continuously prevent and cultivate police members to understand and internalize these ethics in every aspect of their life and duties.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perilaku Aparatur Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Tatanan Administrasi Negara Christine S.T. Kansil; Nethania Aurelia Madelin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1937

Abstract

State officials are people who are used as instruments in government. Even though it has been regulated in the law regarding Government Administration, in practice there are still many problems that hinder it. The behavior of state officials who tend to abuse their authority is a problem that hinders the proper running of government administration. This paper aims to reduce the problems caused by several state officials who tend to abuse their authority. In Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001, it is written that an official who commits an act of corruption because he abuses the authority of his position, resulting in harm to the state, then this behavior constitutes an abuse of the authority of his position. The method used in this writing is normative and quantitative. Apart from that, this research uses legislation and case decisions as a primary legal material approach and literature studies as a secondary legal material approach. Article 17 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law No. 3 of 2014 regulates the prohibition of abuse of authority, where government officials are prohibited from abusing their authority.
Co-Authors Alfandi Alfandi Ardhelia Putri Salsabila Benedicta Angela Prasetyo Gabriel Lusia Hessa Arteja I Gede Putra Wijaya Jesselyn Valerie Herman Jessica Kandiawan Kelvin Arizona Khusbu Vaswani Melia Melia Michael Michael Muhammad Alkindi Soramoes Nanda Resa Nur Aliska Nethania Aurelia Madelin Nisa Harashta Oldriana Lavenia Kumurur Olivia Laksmono Renaldi Vietiamawan Rosdiana Saleh, Rosdiana Sabrina Aurellia Salvian salmon Samuel Evan Sarah Mawaddah Shabariyah Sheren Regina Vedora Simona Bustani, Simona SULTHAN FAISAL ESA M Vanesha Margaretta Vernando Samosir, Anju Doli Vira Adryani Wilson Wijaya Yervant Tavish Serafin Sitompoel