Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review
Nethania Aurelia Madelin
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pelaksanaan Sila Pertama Pancasila dalam Pembunuhan Janin Di Purwokerto dalam Korelasi Undang-Undang 340 Kuhp Jeane Neltje Selly; Angelica Ulinta Ginting; Nethania Aurelia Madelin; Inayah Ar Rohma; Grizca Ratu Maulika; Cheryl Nathania
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1001

Abstract

Pembunuhan berencana adalah tindakan yang terencana dan disengaja yang dilakukan dengan maksud mengambil nyawa orang lain sehingga tindakan ini merupakan suatu perbuatan yang melanggar hukum. Belum lama ini, terdapat kasus pembunuhan yang terjadi di Purwokerto. Karya tulis ini memiliki tujuan untuk melaksanakan sila pertama Pancasila dalam suatu kasus dengan korelasi Undang-Undang 340 KUHP. Kasus pembunuhan ini melanggar Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 KUHP. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 mengenai Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dirancang dengan pertimbangan untuk menyesuaikan dengan kebijakan hukum, kondisi aktual, dan pertumbuhan kehidupan nasionalis untuk menjunjung hak asasi manusia. Di samping itu, pembunuhan adalah sebuah tindakan yang tidak cocok dengan prinsip pertama sila Pancasila yang mengatakan "Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa". Metode yang digunakan termasuk kedalam metode normatif serta metode yang bersifat kualitatif. Selain itu, penelitian ini menggunakan perundang-undangan sebagai pendekatan bahan baku primer serta buku sebagai pendekatan bahan hukum sekunder. Dalam Pasal 340 KUHP, diatur tentang pembunuhan berencana yang dimana pelaku secara sadar dan sengaja untuk mengambil nyawa orang lain, yaitu meliputi hukuman mati, hukuman penjara seumur hidup atau, pada tingkat maksimal dua puluh tahun. Dalam hal ini, pelaku juga melakukan tindakan inses yang ditetapkan dalam Pasal 294 ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Pidana (KUHP).
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perilaku Aparatur Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Tatanan Administrasi Negara Christine S.T. Kansil; Nethania Aurelia Madelin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1937

Abstract

State officials are people who are used as instruments in government. Even though it has been regulated in the law regarding Government Administration, in practice there are still many problems that hinder it. The behavior of state officials who tend to abuse their authority is a problem that hinders the proper running of government administration. This paper aims to reduce the problems caused by several state officials who tend to abuse their authority. In Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001, it is written that an official who commits an act of corruption because he abuses the authority of his position, resulting in harm to the state, then this behavior constitutes an abuse of the authority of his position. The method used in this writing is normative and quantitative. Apart from that, this research uses legislation and case decisions as a primary legal material approach and literature studies as a secondary legal material approach. Article 17 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law No. 3 of 2014 regulates the prohibition of abuse of authority, where government officials are prohibited from abusing their authority.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perilaku Aparatur Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Tatanan Administrasi Negara Christine S.T. Kansil; Nethania Aurelia Madelin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1937

Abstract

State officials are people who are used as instruments in government. Even though it has been regulated in the law regarding Government Administration, in practice there are still many problems that hinder it. The behavior of state officials who tend to abuse their authority is a problem that hinders the proper running of government administration. This paper aims to reduce the problems caused by several state officials who tend to abuse their authority. In Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law Number 20 of 2001, it is written that an official who commits an act of corruption because he abuses the authority of his position, resulting in harm to the state, then this behavior constitutes an abuse of the authority of his position. The method used in this writing is normative and quantitative. Apart from that, this research uses legislation and case decisions as a primary legal material approach and literature studies as a secondary legal material approach. Article 17 paragraphs (1) and (2) of Law No. 3 of 2014 regulates the prohibition of abuse of authority, where government officials are prohibited from abusing their authority.
Co-Authors Angelica Ulinta Ginting Cheryl Nathania Christine S.T. Kansil Grizca Ratu Maulika Inayah Ar Rohma Jeane Neltje Selly