Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : LAW REVIEW

INKONSISTENSI REGULASI DI BIDANG KESEHATAN DAN IMPLIKASI HUKUMNYA TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN PERKARA MEDIK DI INDONESIA Jovita Irawati
Law Review Volume XIX, No. 1 - July 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Karawaci, Tangerang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v19i1.1551

Abstract

AbstractAs an institution authorized to deal with legal complaints concerning improper health services, Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honorary Assembly (MKDKI) has the task of determining whether there are malpractices made by doctors or dentists in the application of medical disciplines in terms of medical professional standards. This authority is stipulated in Article 66 (1) Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice. However, disharmony which occurs between such article and article 66 (3) as well as several health related law in Indonesia seems like negating MKDKI role in determining the element of negligence at the time of an alleged violation such as medical malpractice. Based on this condiion, the study was conducted to examine the impact of such legal disharmony in the practices and services of  Indonesian health sector. Keywords: Medical Law, Patient’s Right, Existence of MKDKI AbstrakSebagai lembaga yang memiliki kewenangan dalam menangani pengaduan atas pelayanan kesehatan, Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (MKDKI) memiliki tugas untuk menentukan ada tidaknya kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh dokter atau dokter gigi dalam penerapan disiplin ilmu kedokteran dan kedokteran gigi yang tidak sesuai dengan standar profesi medik. Kewenangan ini tercantum dalam ketentuan Pasal 66 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran. Akan tetapi, disharmoni antara ketentuan Pasal 66 Ayat (1) dengan Ayat (3) dan beberapa regulasi yang terkait dengan bidang kesehatan seakan menegaskan peranan MKDKI dalam menentukan unsur kelalaian pada saat suatu dugaan pelanggaran seperti malpraktik medik. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengkaji tentang akibat hukum dari disharmoni peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang kesehatan itu serta dampaknya terhadap praktik kedokteran Indonesia. Melalui tulisan ini diharapkan dapat diperoleh kesimpulan dan saran-saran yang relevan yang dapat diterapkan untuk mewujukan pembangunan kesehatan yang berkualitas untuk masyarakat. Kata Kunci: Hukum Kesehatan, Hak Pasien, Eksistensi MKDKI
Judicial Review of Hospitals' Legal Responsibility of Patients' Rights After the Covid-19 Pandemic Irawati, Jovita
Law Review Volume XXIII, No. 1 - July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v23i1.6892

Abstract

Normatively, the legal responsibilities of hospitals in fulfilling patient rights are stipulated in the Health Act, the Hospital Act, and the Medical Practice Act. During the Covid-19 pandemic, which was declared a health emergency, various statutory provisions were also enacted, such as Infectious Disease Outbreak Law, Health Quarantine Law, Presidential Decree Number 11 of 2020 concerning the Determination of the National Public Health Emergency of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) and Minister of Health Regulation Number 4 of 2018 concerning Hospital Obligations and Patient Obligations. In practice, the increasing number of Covid-19 cases in Indonesia has resulted in hospitals being unable to accommodate patients who need treatment, especially patients with severe and critical conditions who require ICU treatment rooms. This study aims to find out hospital’s legal responsibility after the Covid-19 pandemic, especially for the protection of patient’s medical record security under the scheme of telemedicine services. In terms of facilities and infrastructure, the government needs to provide support by increasing the number of emergency hospitals to accommodate patients. This study uses normative juridical research methods supported by empirical studies. The results show that despite limitations in providing excellent health services to patients, hospitals must still maintain the rights of patient’s medical record security and safety while undergoing hospitalization. Legal umbrella is neeeded to guarantee the rights of health workers and hospitals in providing services to patients during this pandemic, especially the protection of Occupational Health and labor social security norms.
Judicial Review of Hospitals' Legal Responsibility of Patients' Rights After the Covid-19 Pandemic Irawati, Jovita
Law Review Volume XXIII, No. 1 - July 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pelita Harapan | Lippo Village, Tangerang 15811 - Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/lr.v23i1.6892

Abstract

Normatively, the legal responsibilities of hospitals in fulfilling patient rights are stipulated in the Health Act, the Hospital Act, and the Medical Practice Act. During the Covid-19 pandemic, which was declared a health emergency, various statutory provisions were also enacted, such as Infectious Disease Outbreak Law, Health Quarantine Law, Presidential Decree Number 11 of 2020 concerning the Determination of the National Public Health Emergency of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) and Minister of Health Regulation Number 4 of 2018 concerning Hospital Obligations and Patient Obligations. In practice, the increasing number of Covid-19 cases in Indonesia has resulted in hospitals being unable to accommodate patients who need treatment, especially patients with severe and critical conditions who require ICU treatment rooms. This study aims to find out hospital’s legal responsibility after the Covid-19 pandemic, especially for the protection of patient’s medical record security under the scheme of telemedicine services. In terms of facilities and infrastructure, the government needs to provide support by increasing the number of emergency hospitals to accommodate patients. This study uses normative juridical research methods supported by empirical studies. The results show that despite limitations in providing excellent health services to patients, hospitals must still maintain the rights of patient’s medical record security and safety while undergoing hospitalization. Legal umbrella is neeeded to guarantee the rights of health workers and hospitals in providing services to patients during this pandemic, especially the protection of Occupational Health and labor social security norms.