Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

E NERGIZING BUREAUCRACY SEBAGAI MODEL PENGEMBANGAN KARIER APARATUR BERBASIS MERITOKRASI DI ERA UU ASN Wasisto Raharjo Jati
Jurnal Manajemen Kepegawaian Vol 8 No 1 Juni (2014): Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS
Publisher : Badan Kepegawaian Negara | The National Civil Service Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1156.981 KB)

Abstract

Tulisan akan mengelaborasi lebih lanjut mengenai perspektif energizing bureaucracy sebagai model alternatif dalam pengembangan kompetensi birokrasi. Adapun pengembangan kompetensi birokrat tidaklah hanya berdasarkan pada merit system yang berdasarkan pada profesionalitas dan berorientasi pada hasil. Namun juga mengarah pada pembentukan sikap afeksi dan afirmasi dalam pelayanan publik. Perspektif ini mensinergiskan nilai-nilai profesionalisme dan voluntarisme dalam pengembangan kompetensi birokrat agar bisa menghasilkan kinerja maksimal baik pada publik maupun organisasi. Kata kunci: birokrasi, kompetensi, merit system, energizing bureaucracy
KUASA DAN KEKERASAN : KELEMBAGAAN PREMANISME YOGYAKARTA PASKA REFORMASI Raharjo Jati, Wasisto
The Sociology of Islam Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012): June
Publisher : Prodi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/jsi.2012.2.1.%p

Abstract

After “Reformasi”, the state lost his governability that implicate frozen democracy. Frozen democracy represent the terms which snugly to depict the resignment of state in social politics arena in society so that creater vacuum of power nowadays. This opportunity later then generate to attend the non state actors to exploit that’s for the sake of person and also groups. For the reason later then happen contestation in reaching for the power by using violence as instrument. As for this violence is happened by as existing state deligimation to making prosperity function so that generate the informal power in society especially urban society. “Preman” as informal violence actor realize vacuum of power in society with forming organizational assorted. By defining democratize their own version, “preman” tried to run the prosperity function among them in violence logic with their repressive and intimidation act. Therefore by adopting the seminal concept of structural - violence in the Johan Galtung’ violence theory, this paper endeavors to analyse the violence logic in informal power conducted by “preman” in dynamics of urban society. Kata kunci : Preman, Premanisme, Kekerasan, dan Kekuasaan.
Fake Populism or Real Populism: Pork Barrel Policy as Political Corruption in House of Representative During 2009-2013 Wasisto Raharjo Jati
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan Vol 4, No 2 (2013): August 2013
Publisher : Department of Government Affairs and Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jgp.2013.0015

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the practice of pork barrel politics in the level of Indonesia legislature tiers and its political management campaign. Since 2004, electoral democracy already delegate to the common people to chosen their representation directly through general election in the level executive and legislative. Those conditions oblige politician and political parties to approaching the commons in order to obtain their vote and popularize both actors into public. The paradigm of research is a pork barrel politics. This paradigm supports to understand and analyze the corruption symptoms i.e. politico corruption in legislative tier and electoral-corruption in political-campaign which become chronic problems in this country. Result of research has showed populism is pivotal key which triggered up politician and parties to corruption in order to persist their political tenure and funding their political cost in pursue to re-elect again in second office terms. No matter their corruption practice that implicate to budgeting fraud. Both actors take political favor to disguise within social aids following the governmental policy, so that, they hindered from corruption accusation. Finally, this paper wants to recommend legal improvement into our budgeting cycle wherein there are public participation to watch it and moral improvement to politician and parties to reducing their corruption if they wants to become truly populist politician figure into public.
THE CLASH OF SUFI AND SALAFIST EDUCATION ON INDONESIAN FACEBOOK Ishak Wanto Talibo; Wasisto Raharjo Jati; Almunawar Bin Rusli
Al-A'raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/ajpif.v22i1.11293

Abstract

This article examines the Facebook-based educational debate between Sufi scholar Ulil Abshar Abdalla and Salafi scholar Yazid bin Abdul Qadir Jawas. Our research addresses three main questions: What educational philosophies do Sufis use to defend against Salafi attacks? What educational approach does Salafis use to refute Sufi’s critiques? How does this theological conflict affect the daily religious practices of Indonesian Muslims? Using Facebook Analytics, this study analyzes recordings from the online Ngaji Ihya and Ngaji Rodja groups. The analysis comprises the coding of images and non-text data, a narrative analysis of social media content, and an examination of audience behaviour. Our research indicates Ulil Abshar Abdalla’s Sufism is a culturally-based approach to overcoming Islamic sectarian divisions within Indonesia. Yazid bin Abdul Qadir Jawas’s Salafist ideology, rooted in textual fiqh, is used to undermine Indonesia’s moderate Islamic voices. The conflict between the two groups stems from disagreements about faith, rituals, democracy, and customs. This theological conflict has resulted in both inclusive and exclusive religious practices. Facebook has become a battleground for competing Sufi and Salafi Islamic viewpoints. Sufism’s defensive position is characterized by its inclusivity and multiple perspectives, unlike salafism’s confrontational and singular view.
Persaingan Intra-Islam sebagai Tantangan Utama Kampanye Moderasi Beragama di Indonesia: Kasus Komparatif Ahmadiyah dan Syiah Raharjo Jati, Wasisto; Halimatusa'diah, Halimatusa'diah
At-Tafkir Vol 16 No 2 (2023): At-Tafkir
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LP2M) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/at.v16i2.7364

Abstract

The intra-Islamic rivalry have been a main challenge in nurturing religious moderation in Indonesia. It basically shows the contestation between each Islamic teachings to shape main narration of religious moderation. That current trend of moderation that led by Sunni has boosted majoritarian perspective among some Muslims and restricted and differentiated minority Muslim groups such as Shia and Ahmadiyya. Consequently, while the current religious moderation has been underway, it unable to accommodate those Muslim minorities. This research aims at analysing the consequences of majoritarian moderation that paradoxically disturbed Ahmadiyya and Shia. Both have been a main proselytization target to be Sunni through violence and persecution because accusation of heresy. By employing data from fieldwork and literatures, this research used qualitative research particularly analytical review. It showed that, the religious moderation cannot bridge in the differentiation Islamic teachings between majoritarian Sunni and Shia/Ahmadiyya. As a result, the violence still underway that affected those Muslim minorities. From this research, it advised to stakeholders hold religious moderation firmly accommodating minorities as part of Muslim society in Indonesia.
MASALAH KEBEBASAN BERAGAMA DAN BERKEYAKINAN (KBB) DI INDONESIA KONTEMPORER Wasisto Raharjo Jati; Almunawar Bin Rusli; Rukmina Gonibala
Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Vol. 17 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Program Studi Sosiologi Agama Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jsa.2023.172-04

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji penggunaan politik identitas dalam kontroversi pendirian rumah ibadah di Provinsi DKI Jakarta dan Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Kami menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dengan pendekatan sosiologi pembanguna. Hasil penelitian kami menemukan bahwa kasus penyegelan Gereja Pantekosta di Indonesia (GPDI) Sleman, diakibatkan oleh kebijakan negara dan intimidasi dari Front Jihad Islam (FJI) Yogyakarta. Posisi minoritas belum menjadi perhatian utama penguasa lokal karena belum memberi dampak timbal balik karena itu berpotensi mendisrupsi tatanan sosial dan ekonomi yang telah eksis. Sedangkan di Jakarta Utara, umat Islam yang menolak penggusuran Masjid Mbah Priok memperlihatkan konservatisme Islam. Posisi Islam menjadi agama favorit Gubernur di Provinsi DKI Jakarta agar kekuasaannya tidak dikacaukan oleh fundamentalis Muslim yang memiliki kekuatan ekonomi dan politik. Akhirnya, relasi sosial di sana lebih bercorak transaksional.