Articles
<![CDATA[Hubungan Hukum Antara Pemerintah Dengan Badan Usaha Swasta Dalam Berbagai Pola Kontrak Kerjasama Pengusahaan Pertambangan ]]>
<![CDATA[Abrar Saleng]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 7 No. 13: April 2000 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol7.iss13.art2
<![CDATA[In a welfare state, the administration of non-governing functions requires that there have been an equal relation between the legal subjects. The relations probably arise from various legal civil actions taken by the government bodies, particularly those bodies withstatus of legal entity. The civil legal between the govemment with civil of legal entity are directed at achieving the highest welfare of the community. The pattern of cooperation contract based on the mining exploitation in juncture of foreign investment according tothe meaning and substance of the rights of the state control shall be production sharing contract.]]>
<![CDATA[Penegakan Hukum dalam Era Reformasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Abrar Saleng]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 11 No. 25: Januari 2004 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss25.art12
<![CDATA[The law enforcement in the reform era has not been achievable even the trust of the public on law and the law enforcement tend to lower and lower. In the reform era public directly witness how poor the law and the judicature are going on. The up holder law still use the out of date paradigm but they use the new fashion.]]>
<![CDATA[Pembukaan Tambak Pada Kawasan Konservasi Hutan Mangrove di Kabupaten Pohuwato ]]>
<![CDATA[Irwan Prasetia]]>;
<![CDATA[Abrar Saleng]]>;
<![CDATA[Sri Susyanti Nur]]>
<![CDATA[ Unizar Law Review (ULR) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Unizar Law Review ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Al-Azhar Mataram ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.53726/ulr.v5i1.487
<![CDATA[Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui penegakan hukum terhadap pembukaan tambak pada kawasan konservasi hutan mangrove di Kabupaten Pohuwato. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian empiris yang menggunakan fakta-fakta empiris yang diperoleh dari perilaku manusia, baik perilaku verbal yang didapat dari wawancara maupun perilaku nyata yang dilakukan melalui pengamatan langsung. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa penegakan hukum administrasi terhadap usaha tambak dikawasan hutan mangrove di Kabupaten Pohuwato belum optimal karena semua usaha yang ada dikawasan budidaya tidak memiliki izin lingkungan. Masalah perizinan pemanfaatan kawasan hutan mangrove belum menjadi perhatian utama pemerintah karena dalam Perda Pengelolaan Ekosistem Mangrove yang dibuat dalam rangka mencegah dan menghentikan kerusakan hutan mangrove tidak mengatur secara jelas perizinan pemanfaatan kawasan hutan untuk dijadikan tambak. Upaya pemerintah dalam penegakan hukum terhadap pembukaan tambak pada kawasan konservasi hutan mangrove di Kabupaten Pohuwato yaitu: dengan meningkatkan pemahaman masyarakat pelaku usaha terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang lingkungan hidup. Meningkatkan anggaran yang akan digunakan dalam rangka pengawasan dan pengamanan kawasan hutan mangrove serta dalam melakukan kegiatan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat tentang pentingya ekosistem mangrove dan menjaga kelestarian lingkungan. Peningkatan kualitas sumber daya manusia yang terampil dan memiliki pengetahuan dalam bidang lingkungan hidup baik Pejabat Pengawas Lingkungan Hidup maupun Pejabat Pegawai Negeri Sipil, sehingga Pemerintah wajib membentuk peraturan daerah yang baru yang lebih khusus dan lebih jelas untuk mengatur mengenai ketentuan perizinan tentang pembukaan tambak di kawasan hutan mangrove.]]>
<![CDATA[THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ON MINERAL MINING ]]>
<![CDATA[Usman Usman]]>;
<![CDATA[Abrar Saleng]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal Philosophy of Law Vol 3, No 1 (2022) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56444/jpl.v3i1.2366
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine (1) the Implementation of Oversight of Regional Environmental Services to Mineral Mining and (2) the Effectiveness of Oversight of the Kolaka Regency Regional Environmental Service to Mineral Mining Post Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning the Regional Government. This research uses empirical research methods. The study’s chosen location was in Southeast Sulawesi, Kolaka District, and Pomalaa District. The basis for consideration of site selection because that the Kolaka Regency is one of the largest nickel mine producers in Southeast Sulawesi Province. The results showed the Implementation of Regional Environmental Services Supervision Against Mineral Mining. It focuses on Environmental Permits issued to conduct Environmental Monitoring of compliance with mineral mining business responsibility. In comparison, the Effectiveness of Supervision of Regional Environmental Services on Mineral Mining Post Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government has not been effectively implemented by the Regional Environmental Agency through the supervision of RKL-RPL and PPLH Permits due to the facilities and facilities provided by the Environment Office to carry out supervision in the field of nickel mineral mining, not available, so it requires facilities from the parties company to carry out supervision. Supervision that must be carried out in applying environmental law requires facilities to carry out supervision effectively without affecting environmental law enforcement activities.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan BKPM dalam Mencabut Izin Usaha Pertambangan ]]>
<![CDATA[Hasti, Armin]]>;
<![CDATA[Saleng, Abrar]]>;
<![CDATA[Sumarji, Juajir]]>
<![CDATA[ AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol 5 No 2 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3218
<![CDATA[The government's consideration in granting mining business permits is based on economic factors and state revenue and to maximize the utilization of mining potential to be processed and produced. The granting of mining business permits (IUP) by the Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) provides benefits to the state and aims to present efficient and just mining management to the community. But in reality, as many as 1,118 mineral and coal mining company permits were revoked by BKPPM because they did not submit a work plan and budget (RKAB) and were not carried out. This research is a normative legal research by examining library materials or secondary data. This study uses a statutory approach, and a theoretical approach. Legally, IUP revocation has 3 (three) classifications, namely IUP revocation because the IUP holder does not carry out his obligations, commits a criminal act, and goes bankrupt. However, in reality many IUPs were revoked by the Head of BKPM because they were deemed not to comply with legal provisions, even though the authority possessed by the Head of BKPM did not yet have sufficient legal instruments to revoke the IUP because the basis of authority possessed by the Head of BKPM was only based on the Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, even though legally based on the provisions of the law the delegation of authority received must be based on government regulations and or presidential regulations]]>
<![CDATA[Perizinan Sempadan Sungai Terhadap Usaha Rumah Makan Terapung ]]>
<![CDATA[Khalik, Widya Dwi Erika Idham]]>;
<![CDATA[Saleng, Abrar]]>;
<![CDATA[A.Sapiddin, Andi Syahwiah]]>
<![CDATA[ Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Widya Gama Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i3.4609
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the arrangements related to the utilization of the river riparian which is used as a restaurant business in the Tello Baru Sub-District, Makassar City and to analyze the form of government supervision of the implementation of river riparian utilization permits in the Tello Baru Sub-District, Makassar City. This research is an empirical research, where the data is qualified as primary and secondary data. Primary data was obtained through interviews, and secondary data was obtained through literature studies. The data collected is then processed using a qualitative analysis approach.The results of the study show that the utilization of river banks which are used as a restaurant business in Tello Baru Village, Makassar City is not in accordance with the Decree of the Minister of PUPR Number 1559/KPTS/M/2020 which states that river banks can only be used for certain activities and certain buildings, which include: Buildings natural resources infrastructure, bridge and wharf facilities, gas and drinking water pipelines, electrical and telecommunication cable stretches, other activities as long as they do not interfere with the function of the river, including activities to plant vegetables, and electricity buildings. So that the use of the Tello River opportunity for floating restaurant activities can be said to not realize orderly spatial planning. And then the form of government supervision of the implementation of river riparian utilization permits in Tello Baru Village, Makassar City is felt to be lacking, in this case the Pompengan Jeneberang River Basin Center (BBWS) as the vanguard of the Ministry of PUPR as the guardian of Law No. 17 of 2019 concerning Water Resources is considered to be still not active in monitoring the abuse of the Tello River border area resulting in violations of the use of the river border. as it is now. The Pompengan Jeneberang River Basin Center (BBWS) is considered to be lacking in coordination and cooperation with the City Government and Village Governments through which the Tello River passes.]]>
<![CDATA[Ketidaksesuaian Penyampaian Harga Tanah: Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah ]]>
<![CDATA[Afifah, Salwah Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Saleng, Abrar]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Widya Gama Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i3.4589
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the PPAT's responsibility for the land sale and purchase deed he made in the event that the parties do not convey the actual land price and analyze the validity and consequences that will arise if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual land price. This research is normative research, where in this research the subject matter of the study is in the form of the application of normative law in action to any particular legal event that occurs in society. The results of the study show that if the PPAT knows that the price entered by the parties is included in the sale and purchase agreement, the PPAT must refuse to make the sale and purchase deed. In addition, it is mandatory for PPAT as an extension of the government to play an active role in providing counseling or guidance to prospective buyers and sellers not to reduce the actual price of the land sale and purchase price between them. Then regarding the validity and consequences that will arise in the future if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual price of the land and without the PPAT knowing as the maker, it can result in the land sale and purchase deed (authentic deed) degrading its evidentiary power to a private deed because it has been made with ways that deviate or are not in accordance with procedures both materially and formally. And it is possible that in the future it will be discovered that the price stated in the land sale and purchase deed is incorrect, so there is a possibility that the parties (seller and buyer) may be entangled in Article 266 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.]]>
<![CDATA[Kewenangan BKPM dalam Mencabut Izin Usaha Pertambangan ]]>
<![CDATA[Hasti, Armin]]>;
<![CDATA[Saleng, Abrar]]>;
<![CDATA[Sumarji, Juajir]]>
<![CDATA[ AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3218
<![CDATA[The government's consideration in granting mining business permits is based on economic factors and state revenue and to maximize the utilization of mining potential to be processed and produced. The granting of mining business permits (IUP) by the Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) provides benefits to the state and aims to present efficient and just mining management to the community. But in reality, as many as 1,118 mineral and coal mining company permits were revoked by BKPPM because they did not submit a work plan and budget (RKAB) and were not carried out. This research is a normative legal research by examining library materials or secondary data. This study uses a statutory approach, and a theoretical approach. Legally, IUP revocation has 3 (three) classifications, namely IUP revocation because the IUP holder does not carry out his obligations, commits a criminal act, and goes bankrupt. However, in reality many IUPs were revoked by the Head of BKPM because they were deemed not to comply with legal provisions, even though the authority possessed by the Head of BKPM did not yet have sufficient legal instruments to revoke the IUP because the basis of authority possessed by the Head of BKPM was only based on the Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, even though legally based on the provisions of the law the delegation of authority received must be based on government regulations and or presidential regulations]]>
<![CDATA[Senjata Api sebagai Mas Kawin Pada Masyarakat Adat di Pegunungan Arfak Papua Barat ]]>
<![CDATA[Caprina, Decyana]]>;
<![CDATA[Saleng, Abrar]]>;
<![CDATA[Azisa, Nur]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): Al-Mizan (e-Journal) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30603/am.v20i1.4125
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the validity of firearms as dowry and the legal consequences arising from the existence of Papuan customary law in the Arfak Mountains of West Papua. This research is a normative-empirical research with a statutory approach and a legal sociology approach. The types and sources of law used in this research are primary data sourced from observation, interviews, and documentation, as well as secondary data derived from literature. Furthermore, the collected data is analyzed with qualitative description. The results showed that: (1) the validity or legality of firearms as a dowry does not apply to the marriage of the mountain people of the Arfak tribe. This is because firearms can only be owned by law enforcement officers and security forces who have permission to use firearms; (2) the legal consequences of the enactment of Arfak tribal customs regarding the provision of firearms as dowry are considered valid because firearms are only a symbol in the customs of indigenous tribes and are considered to have historical values that have been passed down from generation to generation, and are not an aspect that cancels a marriage.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Penguasaan Tanah Ornamen yang Dialihkan oleh Pihak Lain di Kabupaten Gowa ]]>
<![CDATA[Ayustini, Megawati Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Saleng, Abrar]]>;
<![CDATA[Arisaputra, Ilham]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.824
<![CDATA[This study discusses the legal protection of ornamental land tenure rights transferred by other parties in Gowa Regency. The type of research in this research is normative juridical which means the approach is carried out by examining the approaches of theories, concepts, reviewing the laws and regulations concerned with this research or the statutory approach. The type of approach used in this research is the statute approach. The statutory approach is an approach carried out by examining all laws and regulations that are related to the problems (legal issues) that are being faced. The results of this study are: 1) The transfer of rights to ornamental land in Gowa Regency can only be carried out by the Government as the holder of the land rights. Based on Perbup Number 13 of 2018, the Government, in this case the Regent, has the authority to issue permits for land leases. Instead, tenants are required to pay rent fees in the form of levies every year. The lessee is expressly prohibited from transferring the land to another party, whether a person or a business entity, without the permission of the government; 2) Legal protection for holders of lease permits for ornamental land is provided by the Government in the form of an Approval Letter. Tenure rights end at the end of the period the agreement is given. If the lessee transfers the land to another party (third party), then without the government's knowledge, the Letter of Approval must be null and void. Because the subject of the letter has changed]]>
