Articles
<![CDATA[POLA PENGUASAAN DAN PEMANFAATAN WILAYAH PERAIRAN PESISIR SECARA TURUN-TEMURUN OLEH SUKU BAJO ]]>
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Proceeding SENDI_U 2015: SEMINAR NASIONAL MULTI DISIPLIN DAN CALL FOR PAPERS ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Proceeding SENDI_U ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (116.998 KB)
<![CDATA[Pola Penguasaan dan Pemanfaatan Perairan Pesisir secara turun-temurun oleh suku Bajo,dimaksudkan adalah bagaimana suku Bajo yang tinggal bermukim di atas air menguasai wilayahperairan sebagai lahan pencariannya (nelayan penangkap ikan), sebagai tempat tinggal(permukiman), dan bagaimana nilai-nilai local yang diterapkan secara turun-temurun dalampemanfaatan wilayah perairan.Suku Bajo mendiami wilayah perairan pesisir di beberapa desa diKabupaten Muna Sulawesi Tenggara, dan di wilayah Bone Sulawesi Selatan menjadi lokasipenelitian, menggunakan metode survey dengan pendekatan analisis deskriptif kualitatif. Hasilpenelitian menunjukan bahwa: Pola Penguasaan dan Pemanfaatan Perairan Pesisir oleh suku Bajosecara turun-temurun mempunyai kesamaan, yakni: 1) memandang laut sebagai milik leluhur yangmemberikan kehidupan (konsep common proverty); 2) dalam pemanfaatannya ditandai denganupacara rirual, izin Kepala Adat, dan berlakunya aturan-aturan tidak tertulis terkait denganpenggunaan alat tangkap ikan yang sederhana dan ramah lingkungan.]]>
<![CDATA[THE LEGAL PROTECTION FOR REAL LAND RIGHT HOLDER IN CASE OF FORGED RINCIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Nirwana, Nirwana]]>;
<![CDATA[Patittingi, Farida]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Law Review Vol 2, No 2 (2017) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Tadulako University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The legal Protection For Real Land Right Holder in Case of Forged Rincik. The research aimed to investigate (1) the legal protection for the land owner whose possession was based on rincik evidence, and (2) the legal protection on the good-will buyer based on the forged rincik document used in the land sale transaction. This was the normative legal research, also called the library research or documentary study because the research was only conducted on the written regulations or other legal materials or secondary data consisting of the primary and secondary legal materials. The interview was performed to strengthen the theories and opinions in the research. The research also used the Secondary data. the data were analysed and presented using the qualitative descriptive method. The research result indicate that: (1) the real land owner with rincik possession issued after the year 1960 based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court No. 560K / PID / 2008 has not been fully protected due to the fact that the seller is funished for forging the rincik., returning the right to the land owner can not be carried out due to the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482 / PK / Pdt / 2014 which make the buyer win, while the real land owner is the directed to sue the land seller to give the compensation: and (2) the legal protection on the good faith buyer based on forget rincik in the land sale transaction has been fully protected and has the ringt to possess the land based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482/PK/Pdt/2014 because the buyer has bought the land in the presence of Temporary Land Title Registar.]]>
<![CDATA[Aspek Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah Bekas Milik Asing sebagai Aset Pemerintah Daerah ]]>
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 1 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2015 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (780.676 KB)
|
DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v1i1.42
<![CDATA[Tanah sebagai aset pemerintah dapat berasal dari tanah-tanah bekas milik asing yang berasal dari tanah-tanah milik Cina dan perusahaan-perusahaan Belanda. Tanah sebagai aset pemerintah daerah diakui setelah dilakukan pendaftaran tanah/bersertifikat. Dalam penguasaan, pemanfaatan, dan pengelolaannya oleh instansi pemerintah haruslah berdasarkan pada Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 17 Tahun 2007 tentang Petunjuk teknis Pengelolaan Barang Milik Daerah (BMD) agar memberikan manfaat. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa status hukum tanah aset daerah di kota Makassar yang berasal dari kepemilikan asing (Cina dan Belanda) ada yang telah berstatus Tanah Hak namun masih ada pula yang berstatus Tanah Negara/belum bersertifikat, disebabkan kendala pensertifikatan tanah aset daerah bekas milik asing Cina dan Belanda dari aspek peraturan perundang-undangan dan aspek administrasi.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Hak atas Tanah Sesungguhnya dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Menggunakan Rincik Palsu ]]>
<![CDATA[Nirwana, Nirwana]]>;
<![CDATA[Patittingi, Farida]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Pagaruyuang Law Journal VOLUME 1 NOMOR 2, JANUARI 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The legal Protection For Real Land Right Holder in Case of Forged Rincik. The research aimed to investigate (1) the legal protection for the land owner whose possession was based on rincik evidence, and (2) the legal protection on the good-will buyer based on the forged rincik document used in the land sale transaction. This was the normative legal research, also called the library research or documentary study because the research was only conducted on the written regulations or other legal materials or secondary data consisting of the primary and secondary legal materials. The research also used the Secondary data. the data were analysed and presented using the qualitative descriptive method. The research result indicate that: (1) the real land owner with rincik possession issued after the year 1960 based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court No. 560K / PID / 2008 has not been fully protected due to the fact that the seller is funished for forging the rincik., returning the right to the land owner can not be carried out due to the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482 / PK / Pdt / 2014 which make the buyer win, while the real land owner is the directed to sue the land seller to give the compensation: and (2) the legal protection on the good- willing buyer based on forget rincik in the land sale transaction has been fully protected and has the ringt to possess the land based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482/PK/Pdt/2014 because the buyer has bought the land in the presence of Temporary Land Title Registar.]]>
<![CDATA[Pembebanan Pajak Penghasilan pada Pendaftaran Tanah untuk Pertama Kali ]]>
<![CDATA[Erviana, Irma]]>;
<![CDATA[Aspan, Zulkifli]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 1: Mei 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i1.88
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine the imposition of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings on land registration for the first time. This research was conducted using empirical legal research methods with data collection techniques through observation, interviews, and literature. In addition, this research uses the descriptive analysis method. The results of this study indicate that the imposition of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings on land registration for the first time is not a requirement for applicants for rights related to land registration for the first time. However, the Bone Regency Land Office requires proof of payment of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings to the applicant during the land registration application for the first time. Thus, the imposition of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings to the applicant regarding land registration for the first time at the Bone Regency Land Office is considered contrary to Article 4 section (1) of Law No. 36 of 2008 jo. Article 4 section (1) Government Regulations No. 34 of 2016. Therefore, it is hoped that the Head of the Bone Regency Land Office will abolish the requirement for the imposition of income tax on the transfer of rights to land and/or buildings to applicants for rights related to land registration for the first time. Apart from that, eliminating these requirements also avoids the imposition of inappropriate or on target taxes to uphold aspects of justice and legal certainty (the principle of certainty).]]>
<![CDATA[Jual Beli di Bawah Tangan yang dilakukan oleh Kepala Adat Atas Tanah Petuanan ]]>
<![CDATA[Saputan, Robert Lowell]]>;
<![CDATA[Pide, A. Suryaman Mustari]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 24 No 1: Mei 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33096/aijih.v24i1.89
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine legal certainty and protection against buying and selling that is not under state regulations carried out by Customary Heads on customary land. This research was conducted using empirical legal research methods with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. They are collecting data in this study using field research techniques and literature research techniques. The data obtained, both primary and secondary data, were analyzed qualitatively. The results showed that customary land could only be managed, owned, and in principle can be handed over or sold to fellow indigenous and tribal peoples’. As for buying and selling of customary land, it must be proven by a letter of relinquishment of rights and a certificate issued by the Customary Head. In addition, for those who are not indigenous and tribal peoples’, if the material requirements of the legal relationship of buying and selling of land have been fulfilled, the buying and selling of customary land carried out by the Customary Head as based on customary law procedures is considered valid. This letter is the proof of ownership recognized by indigenous and tribal peoples’ in Ambon City, even though the letter is an inauthentic deed. On the other hand, a letter of relinquishment of rights and a certificate issued by the Customary Head are among the documents required by the Ambon City National Land Agency to register land title certificates. Therefore, the National Land Agency needs to raise legal awareness for customary land buyers. As for the party who buys customary land, it is necessary to follow up at the Land Office to immediately register the title of title to land to reduce the risk of overlapping ownership and even disputes over customary land.]]>
<![CDATA[Ketidaksesuaian Penyampaian Harga Tanah: Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah ]]>
<![CDATA[Afifah, Salwah Nur]]>;
<![CDATA[Saleng, Abrar]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Widya Gama Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i3.4589
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the PPAT's responsibility for the land sale and purchase deed he made in the event that the parties do not convey the actual land price and analyze the validity and consequences that will arise if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual land price. This research is normative research, where in this research the subject matter of the study is in the form of the application of normative law in action to any particular legal event that occurs in society. The results of the study show that if the PPAT knows that the price entered by the parties is included in the sale and purchase agreement, the PPAT must refuse to make the sale and purchase deed. In addition, it is mandatory for PPAT as an extension of the government to play an active role in providing counseling or guidance to prospective buyers and sellers not to reduce the actual price of the land sale and purchase price between them. Then regarding the validity and consequences that will arise in the future if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual price of the land and without the PPAT knowing as the maker, it can result in the land sale and purchase deed (authentic deed) degrading its evidentiary power to a private deed because it has been made with ways that deviate or are not in accordance with procedures both materially and formally. And it is possible that in the future it will be discovered that the price stated in the land sale and purchase deed is incorrect, so there is a possibility that the parties (seller and buyer) may be entangled in Article 266 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Hukum Pengendalian Dampak Lingkungan dalam Pembangunan Perumahan di Kabupaten Gowa ]]>
<![CDATA[Khatimah, Andi Husnul]]>;
<![CDATA[Wahid, M. Yunus]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Pagaruyuang Law Journal Volume 2 Nomor 1, Juli 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31869/plj.v2i1.914
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis ketentuan hukum tentang pembangunan perumahan dalam mencegah terjadinya dampak lingkungan hidup dan pengendalian dampak lingkungan hidup akibat pembangunan perumahan di Kabupaten Gowa. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode penelitian normatif empiris dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan studi dokumen. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan hukum tentang pembangunan perumahan dalam mencegah terjadinya dampak lingkungan hidup di kabupaten Gowa. Izin merupakan tindakan pemerintah untuk mengendalikan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup. Pengendalian yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah adalah bersifat preemitif, maksudnya adalah langkah atau tindakan yang dilakukan pada tingkat pengendalian keputusan dan perencanaan. Upaya preventif dalam rangka pengendalian dampak lingkungan hidup perlu dilaksanakan dengan mendayagunakan secara maksimal instrumen pengawasan dan perizinan.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Hak atas Tanah Sesungguhnya dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Menggunakan Rincik Palsu ]]>
<![CDATA[Nirwana, Nirwana]]>;
<![CDATA[Patittingi, Farida]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Pagaruyuang Law Journal Volume 1 Nomor 2, Januari 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31869/plj.v1i2.564
<![CDATA[The legal Protection For Real Land Right Holder in Case of Forged Rincik. The research aimed to investigate (1) the legal protection for the land owner whose possession was based on rincik evidence, and (2) the legal protection on the good-will buyer based on the forged rincik document used in the land sale transaction. This was the normative legal research, also called the library research or documentary study because the research was only conducted on the written regulations or other legal materials or secondary data consisting of the primary and secondary legal materials. The research also used the Secondary data. the data were analysed and presented using the qualitative descriptive method. The research result indicate that: (1) the real land owner with rincik possession issued after the year 1960 based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court No. 560K / PID / 2008 has not been fully protected due to the fact that the seller is funished for forging the rincik., returning the right to the land owner can not be carried out due to the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482 / PK / Pdt / 2014 which make the buyer win, while the real land owner is the directed to sue the land seller to give the compensation: and (2) the legal protection on the good- willing buyer based on forget rincik in the land sale transaction has been fully protected and has the ringt to possess the land based on the decision of Indonesian Supreme Court Number. 482/PK/Pdt/2014 because the buyer has bought the land in the presence of Temporary Land Title Registar.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Hukum Hak Guna Bangunan di Atas Hak Pengelolaan yang Telah Berakhir Perjanjian Pemanfaatannya ]]>
<![CDATA[Suhail, Ahmad]]>;
<![CDATA[Patitingi, Farida]]>;
<![CDATA[Nur, Sri Susyanti]]>
<![CDATA[ Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 5 No 3 (2023): ALDEV ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v5i3.37076
<![CDATA[Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB) di atas Hak Pakai Lahan (HPL) yang telah berakhir dan implikasi hukumnya terhadap pemilik hak yang terlibat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan deskriptif menggunakan pendekatan kasuistik (Case Approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertama, berdasarkan peraturan terbaru, berakhirnya perjanjian pemanfaatan tanah akan mengakibatkan pencabutan HGB di atas HPL, sesuai dengan Pasal 46 huruf (b) PP Nomor 18 Tahun 2021. Kedua, studi kasus menunjukkan kesepakatan pemegang HPL (Pemerintah Kota Makassar) dan pemegang HGB untuk mengakhiri perjanjian pemanfaatan tanah di Terminal Regional Daya. Ini berimplikasi pada pengembalian aset kepada pemilik HPL dan berakhirnya Hak Guna Bangunan di Terminal Regional Daya, termasuk kios milik pihak ketiga. Ketiga, perlindungan hukum bagi pemilik kios dapat dilakukan melalui negosiasi, mediasi, atau melalui Badan Peradilan. Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016.]]>
