Articles
<![CDATA[Artikel Kehormatan: Symphonizing Intellectual Property Laws in the Advancement of Culture ]]>
<![CDATA[Sardjono, Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (433.575 KB)
<![CDATA[The Indonesian Government has enacted the Law on Advancement of Culture. This Law is themanifestation of the trust bestowed by the Indonesian Constitution, entrusting the state to advance theIndonesian culture. This Law is the guideline and ideals for the Indonesian Government and the societyat large in conducting efforts to advance culture. The purpose is so that there is a clear direction in theefforts to develop, utilize, promote, and preserve and protect Indonesian culture in the face ofglobalization and digitalization of world culture. At the very least, this law facilitates individuals who arepart of the society, to be more creative in their art and to be rewarded through rights protection. Theexistence of these two types of laws must create a favorable environment in the efforts of advancingculture. Like an orchestra displaying a beautiful symphony, intellectual property laws and the law ofcultural advancement are also a beautiful symphony in the framework of advancing Indonesian culturein hopes for it to provide an important contribution in human civilization. This paper tries to expresshow the efforts to symphonize the two laws must be done in an assessment that is prescriptivedoctrinal.Simfonisasi Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Pemajuan KebudayaanAbstrakPemerintah Indonesia telah menetapkan Undang-Undang Pemajuan Kebudayaan sebagai bentuk penjelmaan kepercayaan yang diberikan oleh Konstitusi Indonesia kepada negara untuk menjadi pelaksanaan pemajuan kebudayaan Indonesia. UU tersebut merupakan pedoman serta cita-cita Pemerintah Indonesia dan masyarakat dalam upaya pelaksanaan pemajuan kebudayaan, dengan tujuan sebagai petunjuk dalam mengembangkan, menggunakan, mempromosikan, menjaga, dan melestarikan kebudayaan Indonesia di hadapan globalisasi dan digitalisasi dunia kebudayaan. UU ini juga sekiranya telah memfasilitasi anggota masyarakat untuk menjadi lebih kreatif dalam sisi seni dan turut diberikan perlindungan hak kepadanya. Keberadaan UU ini harus mampu menyediakan lingkungan yang memadai guna mendorong pemajuan kebudayaan. Layaknya suatu orkestra menghasilkan simfoni yang indah, hukum kekayaan intelektual dan hukum pemajuan kebudayaan juga merupakan simfoni peraturan dalam mewujudkan pemajuan kebudayaan Indonesia guna memberikan kontribusi penting dalam kehidupan manusia. Artikel ini akan membahas bagaimana cara simfonisasi hukum kekayaan intelektual dilaksanakan dalam perspektif doktrin hukum.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n3.a1]]>
<![CDATA[BORDER TRANSACTION: ANTARA NORMA DAN FAKTA ]]>
<![CDATA[Sardjono, Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 8 No. 5 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[jurnalhukumbisnis.com ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Border Transaction: Antara Norma Dan Fakta]]>
<![CDATA[CULTURE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT IN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Sardjono, Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1907.907 KB)
<![CDATA[Essentially, viewed from the perspective of culture, IPR appears to be a highly embellished and colorful concept. That may be one of the reasons why the implementation of IPR protection in a plural society with diverse interests such as Indonesia invites debate and heated discussion so frequently. Given such circumstances, it would be naïve for anyone to hold on to their own perceptions on IPR without taking into account the existence of other views which are based on subjectivity. Speaking of IPR development, either from the legal, technological or from the economic aspect, IPR cannot be viewed from one single perspective. And this is exactly where the main issue arises. It is often difficult for sectors that are dealing with IPR to take an inclusive standpoint. It is in such context that the cultural study of IPR development becomes significant, both from the economic as well as from the technological point of view. IPR should not be taken out of its context, namely the society in which culture lives and develops.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN FOLKLORE: APAKAH REZIM HAK CIPTA MEMADAI? ]]>
<![CDATA[Sardjono, Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1113.933 KB)
<![CDATA[The government of Indonesia has given a protection for folklore in article 10 Undang-Undang Hak Cipta No. 19 Tahun 2002. It means the protection for forlklore is placed under Intellectual Property’s Regime. The protection is about the regulations of permission for using Indonesian folklore by foreigner but there are some problems occurs. Is it right or wrong to place folklore, there are no evidences to prove that a folklore belongs to, do not mind when the folklore is used by foreigner. This article is trying to give a possibility to solve those problems by seeing the folklore protection in China.]]>
<![CDATA[AUTHOR'S RIGHT IS NOT ONLY COPYRIGHT ]]>
<![CDATA[Sardjono, Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1386.876 KB)
<![CDATA[This article discusses the difference between the concept of Author's Right and Copyright. These two concepts are often mistakenly considered to be inter-changeable. The purpose of this article is to help readers obtain a better insight into the basic concept of Author's Right and Copyright.]]>
<![CDATA[Current Trends and New Approches for IP Education Training and Research: (Indonesian Perspective) ]]>
<![CDATA[Sardjono, Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1353.788 KB)
<![CDATA[Trend in Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) is mainly influenced by certain situation that attracts public attention. In Indonesia, Trend is more oriented on the issues regarding to the recognition and protection of genetic resources and traditional knowledge and folklore. Cases such as maize varieties, avian influenza and genetic resources have brought impact and became trend in public discussion. This article is limited to share information about Trend in IPR Education, Training and Research based on the experience in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Upaya Perlindungan HKI yang Terkait dengan GRTKF di Tingkat Nasional dan Internasional: Upaya yang Belum Sebanding ]]>
<![CDATA[Sardjono, Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1039.705 KB)
<![CDATA[Indonesia is often referred as the fifth largest country that having Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) infringements, it does however not necessarily make Indonesia as a state that does not protect IPR, since Indonesia does have several major laws on IPR protections. The fact has shown on the other hands that the developed nations are not sterile from misappropriation of those IPRs that are primarily corresnponded to the interest of developing countries such as “Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore”. The conventional concept of IPR is considered unable to deliver the protection for Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge, and Folklore (GRTKF) because of its individualist nature. Therefore, it is highly expected there could be a better protection toward GRFTK. This paper will extract the IPR concept related to GRTKF, especially the condition in Indonesia as one of the developing country that has many interests in having protection on GRTKF.]]>
<![CDATA[HaKI dan Masyarakat Lokal Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Sardjono, Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of International Law ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (2857.105 KB)
<![CDATA[There are several substansial problems remain on intellectual property rights in the local society of Indonesia. The needed for protection of intellectual property did not come from the civil society itself but from the pressure of external factor. Intellectual Property Regime is also known as capitalistic regime and that is the problem. The protection is given to the one who own the right, not for the real author. The characteristic of intellectual property is to protect individually. In the other hand, the background of local society of Indonesia, which consists of many tribes, lived based on communalistic. The opposite of concept did not avoid Indonesia for taking a step into ratification of international instruments of intellectual property rights protection. The reason behind is the position of Indonesia as a developing country which has powerless bargaining position put side by side with developed countries. This article attempts to offer another point of view to find out what is the real matter, the root of the problems, why intellectual property regime can not be implemented well in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Artikel Kehormatan: Symphonizing Intellectual Property Laws in the Advancement of Culture ]]>
<![CDATA[Agus Sardjono]]>
<![CDATA[ PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 3 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (433.575 KB)
<![CDATA[The Indonesian Government has enacted the Law on Advancement of Culture. This Law is themanifestation of the trust bestowed by the Indonesian Constitution, entrusting the state to advance theIndonesian culture. This Law is the guideline and ideals for the Indonesian Government and the societyat large in conducting efforts to advance culture. The purpose is so that there is a clear direction in theefforts to develop, utilize, promote, and preserve and protect Indonesian culture in the face ofglobalization and digitalization of world culture. At the very least, this law facilitates individuals who arepart of the society, to be more creative in their art and to be rewarded through rights protection. Theexistence of these two types of laws must create a favorable environment in the efforts of advancingculture. Like an orchestra displaying a beautiful symphony, intellectual property laws and the law ofcultural advancement are also a beautiful symphony in the framework of advancing Indonesian culturein hopes for it to provide an important contribution in human civilization. This paper tries to expresshow the efforts to symphonize the two laws must be done in an assessment that is prescriptivedoctrinal.Simfonisasi Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Pemajuan KebudayaanAbstrakPemerintah Indonesia telah menetapkan Undang-Undang Pemajuan Kebudayaan sebagai bentuk penjelmaan kepercayaan yang diberikan oleh Konstitusi Indonesia kepada negara untuk menjadi pelaksanaan pemajuan kebudayaan Indonesia. UU tersebut merupakan pedoman serta cita-cita Pemerintah Indonesia dan masyarakat dalam upaya pelaksanaan pemajuan kebudayaan, dengan tujuan sebagai petunjuk dalam mengembangkan, menggunakan, mempromosikan, menjaga, dan melestarikan kebudayaan Indonesia di hadapan globalisasi dan digitalisasi dunia kebudayaan. UU ini juga sekiranya telah memfasilitasi anggota masyarakat untuk menjadi lebih kreatif dalam sisi seni dan turut diberikan perlindungan hak kepadanya. Keberadaan UU ini harus mampu menyediakan lingkungan yang memadai guna mendorong pemajuan kebudayaan. Layaknya suatu orkestra menghasilkan simfoni yang indah, hukum kekayaan intelektual dan hukum pemajuan kebudayaan juga merupakan simfoni peraturan dalam mewujudkan pemajuan kebudayaan Indonesia guna memberikan kontribusi penting dalam kehidupan manusia. Artikel ini akan membahas bagaimana cara simfonisasi hukum kekayaan intelektual dilaksanakan dalam perspektif doktrin hukum.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n3.a1]]>
<![CDATA[The Patent System During Global Pandemic and the Access to Medications and Vaccines ]]>
<![CDATA[Fatou Diagne Mbaye]]>;
<![CDATA[Agus Sardjono]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1233.pp55-69
<![CDATA[The Declaration on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and Public Health Agreements want to promote the balanced interpretation and implementation of its provisions and promote universal access by assisting WTO members to protect public health rights. Two years will soon pass, and the emergence of new variants of COVID-19 shows that the virus will not stop at national borders. However, vaccines are gradually entering and almost monopolised by industrialised countries. If Jonas Salk thought in the 1950s that patenting his polio vaccine was like patenting the sun, the problem appearing is that today's patent holders do not think so. The COVID-19 vaccine is owned by biotech companies, universities, research institutes or pharmaceutical companies. The purpose of this research is to analyse, through a normative juridical approach, the requirement for patent holders to protect their intellectual property rights if they are to remain competitive in the marketplace. Not to forget that they must pay patent fees as a percentage of the final price of the vaccine, which is a significant benefit to the economies of the countries where they are located. While for developing countries, the best solution would be to produce their vaccines. With industrial property rights, it seems impossible to transfer the vaccine technology on COVID-19. That is why some developing countries (South Africa and India have the support of many other developing countries) have filed a complaint with the WTO, requesting a waiver of property rights under Article 31 of TRIPS in order to produce a COVID-19 vaccine on a large scale and at an affordable price. ]]>
