Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.763
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Yustisia Merdeka : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Daya Mas : Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hasil Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Justice Voice Blantika : Multidisciplinary Journal Buletin Pemberdayaan dan Pengembangan Masyarakat Jurnal Jurisprudence Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal
Krista Yitawati
Universitas Merdeka Madiun
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Legal Protection for Journalists Against Cyber Threats from the Perspective of the Press Law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law Gilbran Rahardian; Krista Yitawati; Anik Tri Haryani
YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33319/yume.v12i1.374

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: The development of information and communication technology has brought significant changes to journalistic practices in Indonesia, particularly through the utilization of digital media and cyberspace in press activities. On the other hand, such developments have also given rise to various cyber threats against journalists, including account hacking, digital intimidation, doxing, dissemination of personal data, and criminalization through electronic media. These conditions create legal issues concerning the protection of press freedom and the digital security of journalists in carrying out their journalistic functions. Purpose/Study Objectives: This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection afforded to journalists against cyber threats based on Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press and Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), as well as to examine the legal certainty of journalist protection within the digital sphere. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources obtained through library research, which are subsequently analyzed qualitatively through methods of legal interpretation. Findings: The results of the study indicate that the Press Law and the ITE Law have normatively provided legal protection for journalists, both through guarantees of press freedom and regulations concerning cybercrime. However, such protection has not yet fully ensured legal certainty, as there remain overlapping regulations and the application of multi-interpretative provisions within the ITE Law that have the potential to criminalize journalists. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and the strengthening of digital security protection for journalists are necessary in order to safeguard press freedom and the protection of human rights in the digital era.
Constitutional Court Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021: Analysis of Judges' Considerations Is It Permissible to Take Cassation Against Decisions to Postpone Debt Payment Obligations? Krista Yitawati; Pujiyono; Adi Sulistiyono
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 1, June 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i1.1039

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aims to analyze the impact of the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 regarding the permissibility of cassation in the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU). Methodology: The research method used by the researcher was a normative research method by reviewing statutory regulations and related legal materials. Results: The judge's consideration in the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 is the permit of a cassation legal action against the decision on PKPU submitted by the creditor and the rejection of the offer of reconciliation from the debtor so that the court's decision on the PKPU application submitted by the creditor can be corrected as part of the control mechanism over court decisions at lower levels. However, with this decision, it is necessary to immediately issue implementing regulations regarding the mechanism for submitting PKPU and to control the good faith of creditors, so they do not actually injure. This is because the existence of debtors becomes a part of business actors playing a role in maintaining economic stability, so business continuity is sustained and is not misused. That being said, the legal certainty of the PKPU instrument can definitely be realized in accordance with the spirit of Law 37/2004, which is to provide legal protection for business actors. Applications of the study: It is expected that the legal certainty of the PKPU instrument can definitely be realized in accordance with the spirit of Law Number 37 of 2004, which is to provide balanced legal protection between debtors and creditors. Novelty/Orginalty of this study: This research is conducted due to the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 23/PUU-XIX/2021 that has recently been issued, the author analyzed the impact of the issuance of the decision on creditors and debtors. Keywords: Judges' Considerations, Decisions, Constitutional Court, PKPU
Analysis of Judgement on Cancellation of Bankruptcy of Intidana Saving and Loan Cooperative (Review of the Authority to File for Bankruptcy and PKPU against Cooperatives) Anik Triharyani; Krista Yitawati; Arini Wildaniyati; Retno Iswati; Tanawat Sirichai; Sarjiyati
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 13, No. 1, June 2023
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v13i1.1859

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: This scientific paper aims to analyze the review of the cancellation of the Intidana Cooperative bankruptcy associated with the authority to submit bankruptcy and PKPU to the cooperative. Methodology: Using normative legal research methods, this study examined primary legal materials, including Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU, Law Number 25 of 1992 concerning Cooperatives, and Decision Number 43 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022, as well as secondary journals, books, and scientific publications related to cooperative bankruptcy. Results: Bankruptcy proceedings against cooperatives do not have any special requirements, like those against other institutions such as banks, securities companies, stock exchanges, clearing and guarantee agencies, and other institutions. In this case, a cooperative can be petitioned for bankruptcy in the Commercial Court if it has two or more creditors and against whom a debt that is due and collectible has not been paid. The application can be filed by 2 (two) parties, namely the cooperative itself as the debtor and its creditors. The absence of regulations governing the mechanism for filing for bankruptcy in cooperatives has a negative impact on the sustainability of cooperatives. Currently, many problematic cooperatives are filing for bankruptcy and PKPU. One of the problematic cooperatives that the authors are currently studying is the Intidana Cooperative. To overcome the problems in these troubled cooperatives, the government issued SEMA Number 1 of 2022 on the Special Civil Chamber Law Formulation regarding Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations for Cooperatives, where applications for bankruptcy and PKPU statements against cooperatives can only be submitted by the Minister in charge of government affairs in the field of cooperatives, i.e., the Minister of Cooperatives and SMEs and Cooperatives that run the business of Microfinance Institutions whose licenses are from OJK can only be submitted by OJK. Applications of the study: The government is expected to immediately make changes to the Bankruptcy Law and the Cooperatives Law in terms of the mechanism for filing bankruptcy and PKPU for cooperatives, determining clear and firm boundaries between open loop and close loop cooperatives, and where OJK will supervise cooperatives that carry out financial services business activities. Novelty/Originality of this study: Analyzing the decision of the judge's cancellation of the Intidana Cooperative Bankruptcy in the Decision of Reconsideration is associated with the authority to submit bankruptcy and PKPU in SEMA Number 1 of 2022. Keywords: Decision, Bankruptcy, Cooperative.   ABSTRAK Tujuan: Tulisan ilmiah ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kajian pembatalan pailit Koperasi Intidana terkait dengan kewenangan mengajukan pailit dan PKPU kepada koperasi. Metodologi: Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini mengkaji bahan hukum primer, antara lain Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU, Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian, dan Putusan Nomor 43 PK/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022, serta jurnal sekunder, buku, dan publikasi ilmiah yang berkaitan dengan kepailitan koperasi. Temuan: Perkara pailit terhadap koperasi tidak memiliki persyaratan khusus, seperti terhadap lembaga lain yakni bank, perusahaan sekuritas, bursa efek, lembaga kliring dan penjaminan, dan lembaga lainnya. Dalam hal ini, koperasi dapat dimohonkan pailit di Pengadilan Niaga jika mempunyai dua atau lebih kreditur dan terhadapnya suatu utang yang telah jatuh tempo dan dapat ditagih belum dibayar. Permohonan dapat diajukan oleh 2 (dua) pihak, yaitu koperasi itu sendiri sebagai debitur dan krediturnya. Tidak adanya peraturan yang mengatur tentang mekanisme pengajuan pailit pada koperasi berdampak negatif terhadap keberlangsungan koperasi. Saat ini, banyak koperasi bermasalah yang mengajukan pailit dan PKPU. Salah satu koperasi bermasalah yang sedang dikaji oleh penulis adalah Koperasi Intidana. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan pada koperasi bermasalah tersebut, pemerintah menerbitkan SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 tentang Perumusan Undang-undang Kamar Perdata Khusus tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Koperasi, dimana permohonan pailit dan pernyataan PKPU terhadap koperasi hanya dapat diajukan oleh Menteri yang menyelenggarakan urusan pemerintahan di bidang koperasi, yaitu Menteri Koperasi dan UKM yang menyelenggarakan usaha Lembaga Keuangan Mikro, dimana izin dari OJK hanya dapat diajukan oleh OJK. Kegunaan: Pemerintah diharapkan segera melakukan perubahan terhadap UU Kepailitan dan UU Koperasi dalam hal mekanisme pengajuan pailit dan PKPU bagi koperasi, penetapan batasan yang jelas dan tegas antara koperasi open loop dan close loop, dan keberadaan OJK akan mengawasi koperasi yang melakukan kegiatan usaha jasa keuangan. Kebaruan/Originalitas: Menelaah Putusan Hakim Pembatalan Pailit Koperasi Intidana dalam Putusan Peninjauan Kembali dikaitkan dengan kewenangan mengajukan Pailit dan PKPU dalam SEMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022.  Kata kunci: Putusan, Pailit, Koperasi
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Pengguna Sepeda Listrik di Wilayah Polsek Geneng Annisa Jamila; Krista Yitawati; Angga Pramodya Pradhana
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i4.7634

Abstract

Penggunaan sepeda listrik semakin meningkat sebagai transportasi ramah lingkungan. Namun, di wilayah Polsek Geneng masih banyak pelanggaran seperti tidak memakai helm, tidak sesuai usia, digunakan di jalan umum, dan melebihi kapasitas penumpang, sehingga diperlukan penegakan hukum yang lebih tegas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji implementasi penegakan hukum terhadap pengguna sepeda listrik di wilayah Polsek Geneng dan menganalisis kendala-kendala yang dihadapi oleh Polsek Geneng dalam penertiban penggunaan sepeda listrik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, melalui wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi penegakan hukum terhadap pengguna sepeda listrik di wilayah Polsek Geneng masih belum optimal. Meskipun telah dilakukan upaya sosialisasi kepada beberapa sekolah, masih banyak pelanggaran yang terjadi. Penegakan hukum yang dilakukan lebih banyak berupa teguran dan imbauan, serta terpusat pada Satlantas Polres Ngawi. Kendala yang dihadapi Polsek Geneng antara lain adalah belum adanya sanksi hukum yang tegas, keterbatasan kewenangan Polsek Geneng, terbatasnya jalur khusus sepeda listrik, dan kurangnya literasi serta kesadaran hukum masyarakat.  Penertiban penggunaan sepeda listrik di wilayah Polsek Geneng masih perlu diperkuat. Diperlukan pengaturan regulasi terkait sanksi yang lebih tegas, sosialisasi yang lebih intensif kepada masyarakat, penguatan kewenangan Polsek Geneng, kebijakan angkutan gratis untuk anak sekolah, serta penambahan jam pelajaran tentang lalu lintas di sekolah untuk meningkatkan kesadaran hukum masyarakat.
Implementasi Kebijakan Kota Madiun dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik Digital dalam Bidang Pelayanan Kependudukan Adil Pribadi Lase; Krista Yitawati; Meirza Aulia Chairani
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i4.7635

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi mendorong transformasi pelayanan publik, termasuk pelayanan kependudukan di Kota Madiun melalui SIAK, IKD, dan aplikasi layanan digital. Namun, pelaksanaannya masih menghadapi beberapa kendala yang perlu dianalisis agar lebih efektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi kebijakan pelayanan publik digital di bidang pelayanan kependudukan di Kota Madiun dan mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang mendukung serta menghambat pelaksanaannya. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode empiris, yang dilakukan melalui wawancara dengan pihak terkait dalam implementasi kebijakan pelayanan publik digital di Kota Madiun. Data yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pelaksanaan kebijakan tersebut.  Implementasi pelayanan digital di Kota Madiun berjalan cukup baik dan didukung oleh komitmen pimpinan, kesiapan SDM, serta sarana prasarana. Namun, masih terdapat kendala seperti gangguan jaringan, akses listrik, rendahnya literasi digital masyarakat, dan layanan tertentu yang masih harus tatap muka. Pelaksanaan kebijakan pelayanan publik digital di Kota Madiun telah menunjukkan kemajuan yang baik, namun masih menghadapi beberapa kendala yang menghambat optimalisasi dan pemerataan pelayanan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya berkelanjutan dalam meningkatkan infrastruktur, penguatan kapasitas aparatur, serta peningkatan literasi digital masyarakat agar pelayanan publik digital dapat lebih efektif, inklusif, dan berkelanjutan.
Legal Protection for the Community of Kedungputri Village, Paron Subdistrict, Ngawi Regency Against River Pollution Caused by Tofu Industry Waste Mayang Widianti; Anik Tri Haryani; Krista Yitawati; Sarjiyati
Blantika: Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Special Issue
Publisher : PT. Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/blantika.v4i6.524

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the form of legal protection for communities around river areas affected by pollution caused by the tofu manufacturing industry and the factors that hinder its implementation. This study (Legal Protection For The Community of Kedungputri Village, Paron Subdistrict, Ngawi Regency Against River Pollution Caused By Tofu Industry Waste) uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature study. The analysis of legal materials was conducted qualitatively using a prescriptive analytical method. The results of the study indicate that legal protection for the community can be provided through preventive and repressive measures. Preventive protection is carried out through obligations to manage waste, the provision of Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) facilities, as well as supervision and guidance by the authorized regional government. Repressive protection is carried out through the application of administrative sanctions against perpetrators of pollution and the obligation to restore the environment in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Obstacles in the implementation of legal protection include low levels of compliance by business actors with environmental regulations, limited waste treatment facilities, low public awareness, cultural factors that prioritize deliberation, and suboptimal enforcement of sanctions against environmental violations in the area.
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR DEBTORS IN COLLATERAL EXECUTION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CREDIT AGREEMENTS AT KREDITPLUS FINANCE MADIUN BRANCH Inggit Septiyanto Noer Oemahati; Anik Tri Haryani; Krista Yitawati
Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/solj.v4i3.4094

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively analyze the forms of legal protection for debtors regarding the imposition of late payment penalties in non-performing vehicle financing cases at the Madiun Branch of Kreditplus Finance. Using empirical legal research with a descriptive qualitative approach, the study reveals that legal protection is realized through preventive mechanisms, such as contract clause transparency, due date notifications, and credit restructuring, as well as repressive mechanisms via internal complaints, Financial Services Authority (OJK) mediation, and litigation. However, the implementation of this protection faces significant obstacles in the field. These obstacles include low debtor legal awareness, the dominance of unbalanced standard contracts, vulnerable economic conditions of the community, and technical banking operational constraints. In conclusion, although consumer protection regulations are available, the debtor's bargaining position in practice remains weak due to information asymmetry. Therefore, simplifying contract information and enhancing substantive oversight by the OJK are necessary to achieve justice and a sustainable balance of rights and obligations between creditors and debtors in the financial services sector.
Co-Authors Abednego Aprillino Adi Nur Rahim Tri Wi Joyo Adi Sulistiyono Adil Pribadi Lase Adilla Nila Krusita Aldo Ananda Abidin Angga Pramodya Pradhana Anik Tri Haryani Anik Triharyani Annisa Jamila Arini Wildaniyati Bambang Sukarjono Dwi Ulfatur Rosidah Faisal Ferdiansyah Gilbran Rahardian Hery Sumanto Inggit Septiyanto Noer Oemahati Krisnaldi Yitnugraha Mayang Widianti meirza aulia chairani Mohammad Choirul Anam Nindita Galuh Junika Auria Pramesti Pujiyono Retno Iswati Sarjiyati Sarjiyati Sigit Sapto Nugroho Sirajjudin Subadi Subadi Tanawat Sirichai Yuni Purwati Zainal Arifin