Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.022
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Gaussian Media Farmasi : Jurnal Ilmu Farmasi (Journal Of Pharmaceutical Science) Arena Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM International Journal of Nursing and Health Services (IJNHS) Integrated Lab Journal Jurnal PAUD: Kajian Teori dan Praktik Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Persatuan Perawat Nasional Indonesia (JPPNI) Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Budapest International Research in Exact Sciences (BirEx Journal) Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Indonesia Private Law Review Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Jurnal Persaingan Usaha Journal of Social Empowerment
Siti Anisah
Universitas Islam Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 39 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM

 1 
The Protection of Creditor’s Right and Actio Pauliana Siti Anisah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009): English Version
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

In general, the proving of actio pauliana is not simple, and the procces itself is not organized well. For the reasons, in order to make the protection of creditors’ right through actio pauliana is applicable, then we need implementative procedure provision concerning to actio pauliana.Keywords: Creditors’ Right; Actio Pauliana.
Perlindungan Terhadap Kepentingan Kreditor Melalui Actio Pauliana Siti Anisah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 16 No. 2 (2009)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss2.art3

Abstract

Generally, the procedure to prove the application of actio pauliana is not simple. In addition to this, the application for the settlement of actio pauliana is lack or coordination among the relevant authorities. It is considered therefore that the protection on creditor’s interest through actio pauliana is possible to be enforced. More than this, further regulation on the implementation of the procedure to prove actio pauliana which is implementable is highly demanded.Keywords: Act Of Bankruptcy, Creditor, Actio Pauliana
Studi Komparasi terhadap Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan Siti Anisah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol 16, Edisi Khusus 2009
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Initially, the goal of bankruptcy law is the liquidation of debitor’s assets. Later, it becomes the means for reorganization of the company’s debitor, and protects the honest individual debitor by executing discharge. The goal is manifested in Acts Number 37 of 2004 which protects the debtor more as the condition of bankruptcy, however it is not easy to get the bankrupt status in reality. That fact was exploited by using the theory of creditor’s bargain and value-based account. This research used normative juridical method and law comparison. The research found that Indonesian Bankruptcy Acts have not so far protected the creditor, debitor and stakeholders; not based on the philosophy of protecting debitor solve; not differentiating the bankruptcy between individual and company though each goal is different. And the last, it has not introduced the discharge for individual bankruptcy.Key word : Bankruptcy law, creditor, debitor
Studi Perbandingan Pengaturan tentang Pengecualian Industri Pertanian Terhadap Berlakunya Hukum Persaingan Usaha Siti Anisah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 19 No. 4: Oktober 2012
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol19.iss4.art7

Abstract

The research is aimed at finding out whether the exemption for agricultural industries in the competition laws in Unites States of America and European Union is fully or partially granted. In addition, the study examines whether the competition law in Indonesia also regulates exemption for agricultural industries. The research method is normative juridical with a legal comparison approach. The result shows that the exemption for agricultural industries in the United States of America mentioned in the antitrust law was regulated by the Congress through Clayton Act 1916 and confirmed in Capper-Volstead Act 1922. In European Union, the exemption is regulated in the Treaty Establishing the European Community. The regulations in the United States and European Union are the same, in which farmers are allowed to establish agricultural cooperatives that aim to meet the needs of its members, such as collective processing, preparation for markets, merchants, and marketing. Although Indonesia does not have a specific law for exemption, several stipulations in Article 50 and 51 of Law No. 5 Year 1999 can be interpreted as exemption for agricultural industries in the competition law.
Benturan Kepentingan Transaksi Tertentu di Pasar Modal Siti Anisah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 11 No. 25: Januari 2004
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss25.art3

Abstract

To avoid the interest conflict on certain transaction, the major agreement of independent share hoider must be put into in action. The reaiity, many kinds of disobeying on the agreement are found. The law enforcement by Money Market Supervisor as the highest authority in the Money Market has not been maximal and it tends to be unjust to the parties on certain transactional conflict.
Personal Guarantee dan Corporate Guarantee dalalam Putusan Peradilan Niaga Siti Anisah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss19.art4

Abstract

The appeal of statement for bankcrupt towards a trade court for the guarantors have been proposed bymany creditors when the debitor do not pay their debt on be due of debt payment and it- can be claimed. The decision of proposal for bahkcrupt of the guarantor can be fulfilled bythe.judge as long as the prerequirement of appeal for statement on bankcrupt are fulfilled, namely that the debitor have more than one creditor and one oftheir debts is due and it could be claimed, as well as guarantor have escaped his privileges.
Personal Guarantee dan Corporate Guarantee dalalam Putusan Peradilan Niaga Siti Anisah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 9 No. 19: Februari 2002
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss19.art5

Abstract

The appeal of statement for bankcrupt towards a trade court for the guarantors have been proposed bymany creditors when the debitor do not pay their debt on be due of debt payment and it- can be claimed. The decision of proposal for bahkcrupt of the guarantor can be fulfilled bythe.judge as long as the prerequirement of appeal for statement on bankcrupt are fulfilled, namely that the debitor have more than one creditor and one oftheir debts is due and it could be claimed, as well as guarantor have escaped his privileges.
Klausula Pembatasan dan Pengalihan Tanggung Jawab Pialang Berjangka dalam Kontrak Baku Pemberian Amanat secara Elektronik On-Line Siti Anisah; Catur Septiana Rakhmawati
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 24 No. 1: JANUARI 2017
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss1.art7

Abstract

The core problems in this study include first, why the clause of liability limitation is regulated in the Regulation of Bappeti Head No. 107/BAPPEBTI/PER/11/2013 which should provide protection to the parties as the futures trading actors? Second, is the standard contract in the attachment of Regulation of Bappebti Chief No. 107/BAPPEBTI/PER/11/2013 is a binding contract for the traders in the Commodity Futures Trading? This is a normative legal research and its results showed first, the attachment of Regulation of Bappeti Head No. 172/BAPPEBTI/PER/11/2013 is a form of government intervention into the contractual relationship, containing the clause  of the liability limitation of one of the parties namely Broker. This regulation gives injustice for investors. Second, this contract should be null and the mechanism of its cancelation is through judicial review to the Supreme Court.
Batasan Melawan Hukum dalam Perdata dan Pidana Pada Kasus Persekongkolan Tender Siti Anisah; Trisno Raharjo
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 25 No. 1: JANUARI 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art2

Abstract

Resolution of alleged tender conspiracy based on Law no. 5 of 1999 and Law no. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law no. 20 of 2001 has resulted in different decisions. This can be seen in the case of the conspiracies of the tender of the sales of two VLCC tankers Hull 1540 and 1541, Indomobil tender on May 30, 2002, procurement of legislative election ink in 2004, and electronic ID card in 2011 until 2012. This normative research analyzed the intercept between violating the existing laws in terms of criminal law and civil law, and the violation of laws both civil and criminal law in the case of tender conspiracy. The study concluded that, first, the shift in understanding about the unlawful nature (wederrechtelijk) occurs in criminal law, not only based on the criminal law (onwetmatige) but also involves the criteria of violating civil law (onrechmatige), which includes the violation of propriety in community. This is used in criminal law to interpret law violation in a material sense. Nevertheless, there are still different opinions among criminal law experts whether the nature of material law violation only has negative function or has positive function as well. Second, the violation of law that is generally defined in civil law and known in criminal law as a crime in material sense, can be limited by interpretation to determine forbidden acts known as schutznormtheorie or doctrine of relativity. Along with the understanding of law enforcement personnel and jurisprudence, it can be said that the barriers of law violation in criminal law and civil law have gone when the tender conspiracy case already violates the sense of justice in society.
Jabatan Rangkap Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat Siti Anisah
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 30 No. 1: JANUARI 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art3

Abstract

Under the Indonesian Competition Law, interlocking directorate in companies is not absolutely prohibited. This is in contrast to the US Competition Law which prohibits it per se. Nevertheless, the enforcement of competition law for cases relating to interlocking directorate held in the two countries have similarities, namely that it is necessary to prove should there be any impacts on competition. For this reason, this research was conducted by proposing two questions, namely, first, how is the regulation of interlocking directorate in Indonesian and the US Competition Law? Second, how is the enforcement of competition law in regards to interlocking directorate in Indonesia and the US? This normative legal research uses statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative law approaches to answer the question. This study concludes that the US applies the per se illegal approach, whereas Indonesian Competition Law applies the rule of reason approach. However, in the application of the rule of reason approach in Indonesia, it was identified that there was a non-uniformity in the considerations of the Commission Council and KPPU's Decisions for cases of interlocking directorate. The non-uniformity referred to is related to whether or not there has been a violation of the prohibition of interlocking directorate and its impact on unfair competition. Even though the US uses the per se illegal approach, its application still causes controversy because there is a court opinion stating that proof of impact or contrary to all provisions of competition law is required for a violation of interlocking directorate.Key Words: Business competition law; dual positions; Indonesia; United States of America AbstrakJabatan rangkap di perusahaan tidak dilarang mutlak dalam konteks hukum persaingan usaha Indonesia. Hal ini berbeda dengan hukum persaingan usaha Amerika Serikat yang melarangnya secara per se. Meskipun demikian dalam penegakan hukum persaingan usaha untuk kasus-kasus jabatan rangkap di kedua negara tersebut memiliki persamaan, yaitu perlu dibuktikan adanya dampak terhadap persaingan. Untuk itu, penelitian ini dilakukan dengan dua pertanyaan yaitu, pertama, bagaimana pengaturan jabatan rangkap dalam hukum persaingan usaha Indonesia dan Amerika? Kedua, bagaimana penegakan hukum persaingan usaha terkait jabatan rangkap di Indonesia dan Amerika? Penelitian normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, kasus, dan perbandingan hukum untuk menjawab pertanyaan ini. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan Amerika Serikat memilih pendekatan per se illegal, sebaliknya hukum persiangan usaha Indonesia memilih pendekatan rule of reason. Namun dalam penerapan pendekatan rule of reason di Indonesia, teridentifikasi ada ketidakseragaman pertimbangan Majelis Komisi dan Putusan KPPU untuk kasus-kasus jabatan rangkap. Ketidakseragaman dimaksud sehubungan dengan terbukti atau ada tidaknya pelanggaran terhadap larangan jabatan rangkap dan dampaknya pada persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Meski di Amerika Serikat menggunakan pendekatan per se illegal, namun penerapannya masih menimbulkan kontroversi, karena terdapat pendapat pengadilan yang menyatakan pembuktian adanya dampak atau bertentangan dengan segala ketentuan dari hukum persaingan usaha diperlukan untuk pelanggaran jabatan rangkap.Kata-kata Kunci: Hukum persaingan usaha; jabatan rangkap; Indonesia; Amerika Serikat
Co-Authors Adi Sastra P Tarigan Arif Setiawan Bela Pertiwi Catur Septiana Rakhmawati Eko Rial Nugroho, Eko Rial Elfan Fanhas Fatwa Khomaeny Fadhli Fadhli Fadhli, Fadhli Hajizah, Mimi Nur Hamdani . Harya Damar Panuluh Jury Yanto Tarigan Lina Erviana Lucky Suryo Wicaksono Mega Isvandiana Purnamasari Muh, Wendi Muhammad Alim Kurniawan Muhammad Fadlan Syahputra Muhammad Zaky Ridho Subakti Nunung Komalawati Nurdiana Nurdiana Pinta Deniyanti Sampoerno Prido Singarimbun Princessa Deanera Putri Ariqah Putri Nilasari Rahmadhani Fitri Rahmaniar Rahmaniar Rr Tutik Sri Hariyati Sugito Sugito Sulastuti Sulastuti Suparti Suparti Syarah Meiriska Dewi Triana Rahmatika Putri Trisno Raharjo Vit Ardhyantama Wendi Muh Wisnu Dwi Prabowo Yus Chandrawati Zuraidah Tharo Zutaidah Tharo