Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.853
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB Rechtsidee Jurnal Daulat Hukum DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Law Development Journal Perspektif Hukum POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
Ahmad Sudiro
Universitas Tarumanagara Jakarta
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION LAW IN INDONESIA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES Syailendra, Moody Rizqy; Lie, Gunardi; Sudiro, Ahmad
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research identifies challenges, obstacles and opportunities related to the issuance of Law No. 27 of 2022. Protection of personal data is crucial, especially in the use of information and communication technology in the current modern era. The contents of this article were analyzed using qualitative methods and secondary data in analyzing it. The research results show that: although the PDP Law was only implemented in 2022, regulations regarding PDP can actually be found in various pre-existing regulations, then there are principles and provisions that can be included in the PDP Law to better accommodate the need for protecting people's personal data, Furthermore, there are various challenges, obstacles and protections in implementing the PDP Law. The conclusion is that the passing of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection in Indonesia marks a significant step in strengthening personal data protection for Indonesian citizens. However, implementing this law presents various challenges that the government must overcome.
POSITION OF A NOTARY PUBLIC IN INVESTIGATIONS RELATING TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS Silalahi, Wilma; Sudiro, Ahmad
DE LEGA LATA: JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 10, No 2 (2025): July-December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/dll.v10i2.27787

Abstract

A notarial deed is a perfect form of evidence and must therefore be prepared to serve as a strong evidentiary basis in the event of a breach of contract. Thus, a notary in carrying out his/her duties must act trustworthy, honest, thorough, independent, impartial, and safeguard the interests of the parties involved in legal actions. In fact, the notary's duty is basically to express the wishes or actions explained by various parties which will be included in the deed. Thus, the interesting problem in this study is how the notary's position in the investigation related to alleged violations. This study uses a normative legal approach or doctrinal research. For notaries suspected of committing violations in the investigation, the notary can be positioned as a witness or suspect or co-defendant, depending on the notary's involvement in the alleged violation. In the process of examining a notary, investigators are required to obtain approval from the Notary Honorary Council, both for examination as a witness and for confiscation of documents. Therefore, regarding the approval of the Notary Honorary Council, it is not intended to complicate the investigation process or the need for examination of the notary, because this has been anticipated by the provisions of Article 66 paragraph (3) and paragraph (4) of Law 2/2014. Where investigators can obtain an answer no later than 30 (thirty) days. Therefore, there are no issues related to the request for approval from the Notary Honorary Council. If the 30-day deadline is exceeded, the request is deemed approved
The Digitalization of Indonesia’s Commercial Court System for Bankruptcy And Debt Restructuring Proceedings: Digitalisasi Sistem Peradilan Niaga Indonesia untuk Proses Kepailitan dan Restrukturisasi Utang Lie, Sarah Milenia; Sudiro, Ahmad
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 25 ISSUE 2
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v25i2.458

Abstract

he COVID-19 pandemic triggered a global economic downturn that significantly impacted Indonesia, resulting in widespread financial distress and an increase in corporate insolvencies. Amid these challenges, Indonesia’s judiciary accelerated the adoption of digital judicial mechanisms through the implementation of the electronic court (e-Court) system. Rooted in a series Supreme Court Regulation, including the most recent Supreme Court Regulation No. 7 of 2022, the e-Court framework modernized court administration and enabled remote hearings, ensuring that justice remained accessible despite social restrictions. This study employs a normative legal research method, specifically statutory and case-based approach, to analyze the evolution and application of the e-Court system, particularly in the context of Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang or PKPU) proceedings as governed by Law No. 37 of 2004. Using the Garuda Indonesia case (Decision No. 425/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2021/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.) as a reference, the research highlights how e-Court supported judicial continuity and upheld the principles of simplicity, promptness, and affordability as mandated under Article 2(4) of Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power. The findings underscore e-Court’s crucial role in maintaining economic and judicial resilience, while also identifying challenges regarding procedural legitimacy, technological literacy, and equitable access.
Co-Authors Alifa, Alifa Atmadja, Rossano Tito Butar, Bayu Butar Idrus, Irwandhy Lauren, Audrey Lie, Gunardi Lie, Sarah Milenia Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra Panjiyoga, Indrawienny Rania, Rania Silalahi, Wilma Syah, Nurijlal Hafizh Winda Ariria Eka Prawita