Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.976
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unram Law Review Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia Journal Presumption of Law Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Jurnal Al-Hakim : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Edunity: Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Benny Djaja
Universitas Tarumanagara
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Hak Konstitusional Anak Luar Kawin: Implikasi Putusan MA Terhadap Praktik Kenotariatan Yoanfica Risfayeza; Benny Djaja
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i3.2215

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implikasi konstitusional Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1055 K/PDT/2023 terhadap praktik pembuatan Keterangan Hak Waris (KHW) bagi anak di luar perkawinan. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengakuan hubungan keperdataan antara anak di luar perkawinan dan ayah biologisnya melalui putusan pengadilan merupakan bentuk perlindungan hak konstitusional anak, khususnya hak atas status hukum dan perlindungan dari diskriminasi sebagaimana dijamin UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Putusan tersebut berimplikasi pada kewajiban notaris untuk menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam menentukan ahli waris berdasarkan putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis keterkaitan antara perlindungan hak konstitusional anak di luar perkawinan dan tanggung jawab notaris dalam praktik kewarisan. Penelitian ini berkontribusi terhadap penguatan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak keperdataan anak dalam praktik kenotariatan di Indonesia.
Legal Protection of Digital Painting Works as Intellectual Property Right Jessica Calista; Maman Sudirman; Benny Djaja
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 5 No. 2 November 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v5i2.7656

Abstract

Currently, there is evidence of plagiarism or use of digital painting works that were taken secretly without permission from the owner of the digital painting artwork, because this very free digital space makes intellectual property works vulnerable to theft. The aim and focus of the research is more on analyzing legal protection arrangements for digital painting work. The research method used is normative juridical analysis using legal data in an open source manner with digital painting objects. Based on the research results, the legal protection of digital painting is protected by Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and an international agreement in the form of the Trips Agreement. In accordance with Article 4 of the Copyright Law which states that copyright, including digital painting, is an exclusive right which consists of moral rights and economic rights. As for legal remedies for digital painting creators whose creations are misused by other people, they can report them via the E-Commerce Platform and can take legal action outside of court and also take legal action by filing a lawsuit in the commercial court. This research contributes a new regulatory discipline to digital painting.
Validity of the Deed of Relaas at the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) via Teleconference Nurul Izzah; Maman Sudirman; Benny Djaja
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 5 No. 2 November 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v5i2.7657

Abstract

The existence of GMS relaas activities via teleconference which previously only took the form of paper has become an electronic document, in its implementation it is difficult to confirm its validity, however, ratification in the form of a deed is one of the roles of a notary to create evidence in the form of an authentic deed of the General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS). The research method uses normative juridical analysis using legal data in an open source. Based on the research results, ratification of the GMS deed through teleconference media can be implemented because it is based on the law in Article 77 of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, which must be followed by ratification from a notary, also supported in terms of implementation by the Services Authority Regulation Finance Number 16/POJK.04/2020. Apart from that, the validity of the notary's signature in the GMS deed allows participants in the GMS forum. The creation of a GMS relaas deed with electronic signing has also been regulated in the Information and Electronic Transactions Law. The contribution of this research material related GMS deeds of release in the company scope.
The Regulation of Personal Income Tax and Its Enforcement For Foreign Workers Kurniawan Kurniawan; Maman Sudirman; Benny Djaja
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 5 No. 2 November 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v5i2.7658

Abstract

Foreign workers who work in Indonesia are required to pay taxes, especially taxes on the salaries they receive. However, tax collectors are often considered to be detrimental to foreign workers, because they reduce the income from their salaries. The aim of this research is to analyze the regulations for imposing salary tax on foreign nationals who work in Indonesian territory and the sanctions that can be given to foreign nationals who do not pay tax from their salaries. The research method in this scientific journal uses a normative juridical approach using data available through Open Source. The results is based on the Tax Harmonization Law, which states that foreign citizens who have obtained work permits can automatically be said to be taxpayers. As for the imposition of PPH 21 income tax for salaries for foreign workers on fixed income, the amount of income subject to tax is in the Minister of Finance Regulation number 101/PMK.010/2016. The legal sanctions for foreign citizens do not pay their salary taxes include fines, interest sanctions and increased tax sanctions. The research contribution is to raise new scientific discipline for more comprehensive regulation of foreign taxpayers.
Perlindungan Hukum Pembeli dalam Akta PPJB Lunas Tanpa Tenggat Waktu: Risiko dan Peran Notaris Steven Galileo Haryanto; M. Sudirman; Benny Djaja
Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v6i1.365

Abstract

Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) lunas merupakan perjanjian pendahuluan yang dibuat oleh notaris saat pembeli telah melunasi seluruh harga objek jual beli, namun belum terjadi peralihan hak karena penjual belum memenuhi kewajibannya. Permasalahan muncul ketika PPJB tersebut tidak mencantumkan tenggat waktu pemenuhan kewajiban oleh penjual, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan ketimpangan hak dan kewajiban serta menyulitkan pembeli dalam membuktikan wanprestasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis keabsahan dan kekuatan mengikat PPJB tanpa tenggat waktu, mengidentifikasi risiko hukum yang timbul bagi pembeli, serta merumuskan peran notaris dalam menjamin proporsionalitas dan kepastian hukum dalam isi akta. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan data primer berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan data sekunder berupa literatur hukum. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa PPJB tanpa tenggat waktu tetap sah secara formil, namun berisiko secara substantif. Oleh karena itu, klausul tenggat waktu penting dimasukkan dalam PPJB sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum preventif terhadap risiko wanprestasi oleh penjual.
Perbandingan Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Rumah Susun di Indonesia dan Singapura Stella Stella; Benny Djaja
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i3.14342

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing apartment ownership in Indonesia and Singapore and to compare the degree of legal certainty provided by both systems in protecting owners’ rights. Legal certainty of apartment ownership in Indonesia still faces several issues, including the dependence of Ownership Rights to Apartment Units (HMSRS) on land rights, a non-integrated registration system, and the evidentiary weakness of Apartment Ownership Certificates (SHMSRS) which remain challengeable. This research is important due to the limited comparative studies examining legal certainty of apartment ownership through indicators of ownership structure, registration systems, relationship with land rights, and evidentiary strength of ownership certificates. This research employs normative legal methods through statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that Indonesia still experiences regulatory fragmentation, dependence of HMSRS on land rights status, and a non-integrated registration system, while Singapore applies a centralized electronic registration system based on the principle of indefeasibility of title which provides stronger legal certainty. The study concludes that the integration of legal and registration systems constitutes the primary factor in determining legal certainty of apartment ownership. The novelty of this research lies in its comparative analysis that positions ownership structure, registration systems, relationship with land rights, and evidentiary strength of ownership certificates as the principal indicators of legal certainty in apartment ownership.     Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan hukum kepemilikan rumah susun di Indonesia dan Singapura serta membandingkan tingkat kepastian hukumnya dalam menjamin perlindungan hak pemilik. Kepastian hukum kepemilikan rumah susun di Indonesia masih menghadapi berbagai persoalan, seperti ketergantungan Hak Milik atas Satuan Rumah Susun (HMSRS) terhadap hak atas tanah, sistem registrasi yang belum terintegrasi, dan kekuatan pembuktian Sertifikat Hak Milik atas Satuan Rumah Susun (SHMSRS) yang masih dapat digugat. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan karena kajian komparatif mengenai kepastian hukum kepemilikan rumah susun melalui indikator struktur hak, sistem registrasi, hubungan dengan hak atas tanah, dan kekuatan bukti kepemilikan masih terbatas. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia masih menghadapi fragmentasi regulasi, ketergantungan HMSRS terhadap status hak atas tanah, dan sistem registrasi yang belum terintegrasi, sedangkan Singapura menerapkan registrasi elektronik terpusat dengan prinsip indefeasibility of title yang memberikan kepastian hukum lebih kuat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa integrasi sistem hukum dan registrasi menjadi faktor utama dalam membangun kepastian hukum kepemilikan rumah susun. Kebaruan penelitian terletak pada analisis komparatif yang menempatkan struktur hak, sistem registrasi, hubungan hak atas tanah, dan kekuatan bukti kepemilikan sebagai indikator utama kepastian hukum rumah susun.
Konflik Norma Pemanggilan Notaris dalam Perkara Pidana Perpajakan Ko Susy Tanzil; Benny Djaja
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i3.14343

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the disharmony of norms concerning the summoning of notaries by law enforcement officials in tax crime cases between Article 66 of the Law on Notary Position and Article 7 paragraph (5) letter e of Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2025. The urgency of this study arises from the absence of clear procedural synchronization, which creates legal uncertainty, overlapping authority, and potential violations of notarial confidentiality and due process of law. Previous studies have generally focused on the position of notaries as witnesses or on notarial ethics, but have not specifically examined the vertical normative conflict between the Law on Notary Position and Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2025 in tax crime proceedings. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches with qualitative legal analysis. The findings reveal that the summoning of notaries in tax crime cases must still obtain prior approval from the Notary Honorary Council as mandated by Article 66 of the Law on Notary Position. The novelty of this study lies in the formulation of a vertical harmonization framework that positions the Law on Notary Position as the primary procedural norm and Supreme Court Regulation Number 3 of 2025 as a technical evidentiary norm, thereby strengthening legal certainty, ensuring due process of law, and protecting the dignity of the notarial office.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis disharmonisasi norma mengenai pemanggilan notaris oleh aparat penegak hukum dalam perkara pidana perpajakan antara Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan Pasal 7 ayat (5) huruf e Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2025. Urgensi penelitian ini muncul karena belum adanya sinkronisasi prosedural yang jelas sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, tumpang tindih kewenangan, serta potensi pelanggaran terhadap kerahasiaan jabatan notaris dan due process of law. Penelitian sebelumnya umumnya hanya membahas kedudukan notaris sebagai saksi atau etika profesi notaris, namun belum secara khusus mengkaji konflik norma vertikal antara UUJN dan Perma 3/2025 dalam perkara pidana perpajakan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual serta analisis hukum kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemanggilan notaris dalam perkara pidana perpajakan tetap wajib memperoleh persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 66 UUJN. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada perumusan kerangka harmonisasi vertikal yang menempatkan UUJN sebagai norma prosedural utama dan Perma 3/2025 sebagai norma teknis pembuktian, sehingga mampu memperkuat kepastian hukum, menjamin due process of law, dan melindungi martabat jabatan notaris.
Co-Authors Altina Intan N Dixon Sanjaya Jesica Jesica Jessica Calista Ko Susy Tanzil Kurniawan Kurniawan Livia Kusumadiani Putri M. Sudirman Maman Sudirman Michelle Hibono Nada Salsabila Nurul Izzah Sanny Estera Stella Stella Stevanny Stevanny Steven Galileo Haryanto Tasya Nabilla Wulan Agustini Yoanfica Risfayeza