Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Poetika: Jurnal Ilmu Sastra Suar Betang Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (JBIPA) BUANA GENDER : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran BAHASTRA Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia (JPMI) PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL DAN INTERNASIONAL HIMPUNAN SARJANA-KESUSASTRAAN INDONESIA AL-MAIYYAH: Media Transformasi Gender dalam Paradigma Sosial Keagamaan
Sri Lestari
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : bahastra

 1 
Integration of classroom assessment techniques in authentic assessment for literature learning in higher education: A conceptual literature review Sri Lestari; Ria Kasanova; Roni Sulistiyono
BAHASTRA Vol. 46 No. 2 (2026): BAHASTRA
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Conventional assessment in university literature courses often prioritises theoretical knowledge while providing limited evidence of students’ interpretive, applicative, performative, research, and reflective competencies. This conceptual literature review investigated how classroom assessment techniques (CAT) could be incorporated into an authentic assessment framework for literature education. A structured search across Scopus, ERIC, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Garuda identified 38 publications for theory-informed thematic analysis. The analysis integrated conceptual definitions, assessment principles, task characteristics, student actions, learning evidence, and relationships among authentic assessment, CAT, and literary competence. Five interrelated competency dimensions emerged: interpretation, application, performance, research, and reflection. Based on these dimensions, the review proposes primary but non-exclusive alignments with five CAT techniques: directed paraphrasing, application cards, human tableau, paper or project prospectuses, and student-generated questions. The resulting framework positions authentic assessment as the overarching approach and CAT as a potential mechanism for eliciting varied evidence of literary competence. Rather than prescribing fixed one-to-one correspondences, the framework recognises that each technique may address multiple competencies and may be adapted to literary genre, learning outcomes, classroom conditions, and assessment purposes. The study contributes a conceptually grounded and context-sensitive model for designing participatory, competency-oriented assessment in university literature education. As the framework derives from literature synthesis rather than classroom implementation, its feasibility, effectiveness, and educational value remain to be established through empirical validation across diverse courses and institutional contexts.
Co-Authors Alif Nur Khayati Alifia Nur Aini Arif Nugroho Dea Permata Dewi Faiz Luqman Pradana Fllorenta Fani Diah Aprilia Putri Hafsah Salsabila Az Zahro Hary Sulistyo Hubbi Saufan Hilmi Kasanova, Ria Mu'adz Muhsin Al Thahar Najwa Revalia Salsabila Roni Sulistiyono