Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Khazanah Hukum Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Society Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law
Pitriani Pitriani
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Pendekatan Preventif dan Represif terhadap Perlindungan Hak-hak Konsumen dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Pitriani Pitriani; Zufriani; Darlius
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1673

Abstract

This research aims to analyse the protection of consumer rights in the context of E-commerce transactions, with a focus on preventive and refressive aspects. The subject matter raised is how the protection of consumer rights can be realised in e-commerce transactions. To answer the problem, a normative juridical research approach is used with two main approaches, namely conceptual approach and statutory approach. The research findings reveal that the protection of consumer rights in E-commerce transactions can be realised through preventive approaches such as guidance, supervision, and protection by the government to consumers. In addition, a repressive approach can also be taken to resolve E-commerce transaction disputes involving international and national aspects that include non-litigation and litigation mechanisms.
Re-Reading Al-Uqud Al-Murakkabah: Types and Models of Hybrid Contracts Concept in Fatwa DSN-MUI Pitriani Pitriani; Doli Witro; Muhamad Izazi Nurjaman; Iib Hibaturohman; Imaro Sidqi
Khazanah Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 2 August (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v6i2.34717

Abstract

The aims of this research is to clarify the type of multi-contract used by National Sharia Council-Indonesian Ulama Council (DSN-MUI) in its product innovation, so that the multi-contract concept used is a multi-contract concept that is in accordance with sharia rules and principles. This research is sharia economic law research that uses descriptive literature research methods. This research uses a normative juridical approach. The primary data used in this research is the DSN-MUI Fatwa which is related to the concept of hybrid contracts in the innovation of sharia banking products. Meanwhile, Secondary data sources include various sources of literature such as laws, scientific articles, books, and others. The data analysis technique used was the cumulative data analysis technique of Miles et al., namely data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. This study found that so far, the DSN-MUI has used the type of multi-contract for similar contracts (a combination of muawadhat contracts) and also non-similar contracts (a combination of muawadhat contracts and tabarru’ contracts) provided that there is a separation of agreement documents to avoid usury schemes for the use of these contract combinations and income (both margins, ujrah, and profit sharing) is obtained from the use of muawadhat contracts. This non-similar contract combination scheme is confirmed in the Fatwa on the Income of Islamic Financial Institutions (LKS) During the Construction Period (Fatwa No. 142 of 2021), namely Al- Uqud al-Murakkabah al-Muta’addidah. Meanwhile, the hybrid contracts scheme for similar contracts uses the Al-Uqud al-Murakkabah al-Mutajanisah hybrid contracts scheme
Upaya perlindungan hukum pidana bagi korban bullying di indonesia Hawra Fadila Srianti; Pitriani Pitriani
Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Society Vol 4, No 1 (2024): Asian Journal of Islamic Studies and Society
Publisher : RedWhite Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32698/017419

Abstract

Bullying merupakan tindakan agresif yang dilakukan secara sengaja dan berulang oleh pihak yang lebih kuat terhadap korban yang lebih lemah, baik secara verbal, fisik, seksual, maupun melalui media digital (cyberbullying). Tingginya angka kasus 2.057 pengaduan yang diterima Komisi Perlindungan Anak Indonesia (KPAI) sepanjang 2024 menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan terhadap korban belum berjalan optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis efektivitas perlindungan hukum pidana bagi korban bullying di Indonesia dan mengidentifikasi hambatan penegakannya, termasuk pada kasus cyberbullying. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Bahan hukum primer berupa Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak, Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, dan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, dilengkapi bahan sekunder serta data KPAI, dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif dan preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kerangka normatif perlindungan korban khususnya Pasal 76C dan Pasal 80 UU Perlindungan Anak serta hak restitusi pada Pasal 71D telah memadai pada tataran norma, tetapi lemah pada tataran implementasi. Mekanisme diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak berpotensi menggeser kepentingan korban, sementara penegakan terhadap cyberbullying terhambat persoalan pembuktian digital. Penelitian ini menegaskan perlunya harmonisasi regulasi, penguatan pelaksanaan restitusi, dan mekanisme pelaporan berbasis sekolah yang melibatkan guru bimbingan dan konseling.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mediation as an Alternative for Civil Dispute Resolution: Quantitative Research in District Courts Morse Kathryn; Taufiq Amini; Kalijunjung Kalijunjung; Pitriani Pitriani; Arief Fahmi Lubis
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55849/rjl.v2i2.919

Abstract

Background. Background This research is based on the need for an effective alternative for the resolution of civil disputes in the District Court due to the problems that often arise in the conventional justice system. Mediation has been considered as one of the promising alternatives, but there has been no thorough evaluation of how effective this method is in the context of the District Court. Purpose. This study aims to quantitatively evaluate how effective mediation is as an alternative to civil dispute resolution in the District Court. Method. The quantitative method collects data through surveys and interviews with mediation participants. The aim was to determine how effective mediation is as an alternative to civil dispute resolution in the district courts. The data collected was then analyzed to identify factors that influence the success of mediation. Results. This study shows the success rate of mediation as a civil dispute resolution option in the District Court and the factors that influence the outcome. Conclusion. This study found that mediation can serve as an effective alternative to civil dispute resolution in the District Court. However, the study also emphasizes that further attention is needed to the factors that determine the success of mediation. The research also provides a basis for policy and practice recommendations that can improve the success of mediation in civil dispute resolution in the District Courts.
Co-Authors Arief Fahmi Lubis darlius Doli Witro Hawra Fadila Srianti Iib Hibaturohman Imaro Sidqi Kalijunjung Kalijunjung Morse Kathryn Muhamad Izazi Nurjaman Taufiq Amini Zufriani