Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Kejanggalan Beberapa Putusan Korupsi Pengadaan dan Kaitannya dengan Konstitusi Wibowo, Richo Andi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

This paper aims at highlighting some odd court decisions on corruption typed “state financial loss” in public procurement sector. It is odd because of the following reasons: (i) the nature of the case is more about administrative or private law instead of criminal law; (ii) some consider that it will be unjust to sentence guilty the accused; (iii) the cases ensnare persons who are perceived as reformist and clean. The first point will be the focus of elaboration. It will be argued that the encroachment of criminal law towards the area of administrative and private laws are caused by the lower standard of proof for the corruption typed “state financial loss”. Currently, the applied standard is “more likely than not” instead of “beyond reasonable doubt”. The situation which some people are jailed while their faults are more about administrative and private is a justice issue. As the upright of justice is the mandate of the constitution, therefore, articles that create this injustice (Article 2 section (1) and Article 3 of the Eradication Corruption Act) should be re-reviewed by the Constitutional Court. Although the court has previously reviewed the Articles and, therefore, this should be seen as a final and binding; this paper will give some arguments which explain the needs for the court to re-settle this matter.

Mencegah Korupsi Pengadaan Barang Jasa (Apa yang Sudah dan yang Masih Harus Dilakukan?) Wibowo, Richo Andi
Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 1 No. 1 (2015): INTEGRITAS Volume 01 Nomor 1 Tahun 2015
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan sekaligus mengapresiasi aneka upaya yang telah dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Indonesia untuk mendesain pencegahan korupsi di sektor pengadaan barang/jasa, seperti (i) mendesain organisasi pengadaan yang berstruktur lebih horisontal, sehingga sesama petugas bisa saling kontrol satu sama lain; serta (ii) mendesain pengadaan barang dan jasa secara elektronik, khususnya electronic purchasing yang memungkinkan pembelian barang dengan cara efektif dan mengurangi potensi manipulasi dalam proses tender. Namun demikian, tulisan ini juga ingin memberikan catatan kritis yang perlu diperhatikan dari kedua keberhasilan ini. Selanjutnya, berdasarkan analisa perbandingan hukum administrasi negara, tulisan ini juga ingin menekankan bahwa masih terdapat berbagai hal yang dapat dipertimbangkan untuk meningkatkan efektifitas pencegahan korupsi di sektor pengadaan, seperti memperluas cakupan mekanisme sanggah lelang di Indonesia dengan mempertimbangkan mengadopsi regulasi yang diterapkan di Belanda. Di Indonesia, mekanisme sanggah hanya efektif untuk melindungi peserta tender yang merasa dirugikan dengan memberikan kesempatan untuk menyanggah keputusan pemenang lalang. Mekanisme sanggah di Indonesia tidak melindungi (tidak memberikan kesempatan sanggah) kepada calon peserta tender yang merasa dirugikan akibat dokumen pengadaan, misalnya karena desain spesifikasi dan/atau persyaratan pengadaan yang dianggap tidak adil. Mengingat pemerintah masih mempersiapkan Rancangan Undang-undang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa, maka tulisan ini juga dapat diposisikan sebagai sumbangsih saran.

Pelayanan Publik dan Kajian Putusan Korupsi Pengadaan Jasa Konstruksi dalam Perspektif Kontrak Jasa Konstruksi: Civil Engineering Perspective Kombong, Eka Priska; Nugroho, Arief Setiawan Budi; Wibowo, Richo Andi
Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v6i2.665

Infrastructure Availability such as government buildings, schools, hospitals are pivotal to underpin public services. The existence of infrastructure like irrigations, ports, roads, bridges, are also important to support social and economic activities of the people. However, the process of procurement in acquiring contractor may be tainted by corruption. This article examines various court decisions which have been final and binding. Three of the selected decisions are appealing to be discussed further, because it is doubted that the legal enforcers have been appropriately enforcing the law and understanding the context. On the first case, the legal enforcers have enforced the anti-corruption law to cases which are detrimental to the state finance. However, the substance of the cases is more suitably categorized as bribery or at least as gratification. On the last two cases, the legal enforcers have applied anti-corruption law for cases that cause the state financial loss. Nevertheless, from the perspective of civil engineering, whether the defendants were guilty are still debatable.

Kejanggalan Beberapa Putusan Korupsi Pengadaan dan Kaitannya dengan Konstitusi Wibowo, Richo Andi
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

This paper aims at highlighting some odd court decisions on corruption typed â€œstate financial lossâ€ in public procurement sector. It is odd because of the following reasons: (i) the nature of the case is more about administrative or private law instead of criminal law; (ii) some consider that it will be unjust to sentence guilty the accused; (iii) the cases ensnare persons who are perceived as reformist and clean. The first point will be the focus of elaboration. It will be argued that the encroachment of criminal law towards the area of administrative and private laws are caused by the lower standard of proof for the corruption typed â€œstate financial lossâ€. Currently, the applied standard is â€œmore likely than notâ€ instead of â€œbeyond reasonable doubtâ€. The situation which some people are jailed while their faults are more about administrative and private is a justice issue. As the upright of justice is the mandate of the constitution, therefore, articles that create this injustice (Article 2 section (1) and Article 3 of the Eradication Corruption Act) should be re-reviewed by the Constitutional Court. Although the court has previously reviewed the Articles and, therefore, this should be seen as a final and binding; this paper will give some arguments which explain the needs for the court to re-settle this matter.

Kajian Implikasi Undang-undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Peraturan Daerah Tentang Bangunan Gedung di Kabupaten Wonogiri Nurokhman, Nurokhman; Wibowo, Richo Andi; Saputra, Ashar; Hariyanto, Gatot
Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Lembaga Dakwah dan Pembangunan Masyarakat Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta (LDPM UCY)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47200/jnajpm.v9i4.2092

This research aims to identify the readiness of the Wonogiri Regency in 2021 regarding regional policies in building planning that support the Job Creation Law (No. 11/2020). Several analytical approaches are used with data taken directly through interviews and focus group discussions and other supporting data. As a result, Wonogiri Regency has two options, namely first, the Wonogiri Regency Building Regulations are revoked in their entirety on the grounds that the "spirit" has been amended by Law Number 11/2020 and PP Number 16/2021 concerning Building Implementation Regulations whose regulatory concept has changed from IMB to PBG . The second option is partial revision. In its implementation, it is necessary to increase the effectiveness of law enforcement, SIMBG tools and increase the capacity and competence of human resources as well as ensuring the Regional Regulations on RTRW and RDTR, and the Regional Regulation on Retributions.

National Strategic Projects and Compensation Issues in Land Acquisition in Indonesia: A Justice Theory Perspective Pattra, Lerri; Ismail, Nurhasan; Wibowo, Richo Andi
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.14.1.2025.1-28

The compensation issue is still one of the factors inhibiting development in Indonesia. The government must develop to establish a flourishing society, as required by Pancasila and the Constitution. The government implements National Strategic Projects and initiatives designed to foster growth and equitable development, increase employment opportunities, and enhance community welfare. Limited land control by the government means that the government also needs land owned by the community. When it comes to inland procurement for development, the community whose land rights are impacted by the national strategic project is nearly always unhappy, especially regarding loss compensation. The most complicated and contentious part of taking land for public use is usually the compensation for losses that arise when the government purchases a piece of land. The limited government budget for building infrastructure and restrictions on regulations for using other state finances have caused the government to look for forms and amounts of compensation that can provide a sense of fairness and worth to the community without burdening state finances. Upholding respect for human rights is acknowledged as a form of protection offered by the state to its citizens in Indonesia, a country that upholds the rule of law. This protection extends to situations where the state takes over community land to be used for development in the public interest. The strategies put out to resolve the land acquisition dispute are grounded in the idea of social justice, which is still relevant and evolving in the Indonesian culture of society.

Civil Servant Disobedience: An Alternative Legal Strategy to Prevent Bureaucratic Pathology Wibowo, Richo Andi
The Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies Vol. 5, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This paper seeks to provide conceptual and empirical justifications for civil servants to engage in disobedience to curb bureaucratic pathology. Various civil servants have long complained that they face illegal instructions from their superiors. The cases discussed here are from public procurement, which has a dimension of political corruption, a recurring problem in many places in Indonesia. Thus, the problem shall be seen as a bureaucratic pathology rather than as maladministration. As the reporting of superiors to legal enforcers may be too risky, the disobedience can be accomplished by refusing to cooperate with superiors who give illegal instructions. The term 'superiors' here focuses on positions in government held by politicians, temporary positions obtained through elections, such as president, governor, mayor or regent, and temporary political positions given by appointment to a particular person, such as that of minister. There are four arguments in favour of civil servant disobedience. First, civil servant disobedience is rooted in the concept of civil disobedience, which has certain virtues and has been globally accepted. Second, legal justification dictates that civil servants' loyalty is not to their superiors but primarily to society and the law. Third, a cost–benefit analysis based on several court decisions, interviews and risk factor mapping reveals that the benefits to bureaucrats of following illegal instructions from politicians are less than the risks and sanctions. Fourth, from a religious sociological perspective, religion requires obedience only to God, not servitude to man or worldly interests. The justifications offered here for civil servant disobedience may be applicable to the Indonesian context and serve as food for thought for any country facing similar situations.

Analisis Terhadap Sengketa Informasi Publik Dokumen Perjanjian Kerja Sama (PKS) Pada Program Kartu Prakerja Nusanto, Irfan Ardyan; Wibowo, Richo Andi
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 31 No. 1: JANUARI 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss1.art1

This paper analyzes the public information dispute regarding the Memorandum of Agreement (PKS) document for the Pre-Employment Card program in the Central Information Commission Decision No. 013/VI/KIP-PS-A/2020 and Jakarta Administrative Court Decision No. 233/G/KI/2020/PTUN.JKT to see whether public bodies have implemented the principle of transparency in PKS documents. The methods used are the statutory, case study, and conceptual approaches with deductive analysis. The results of the research conclude that firstly, the Information Commission's decision deserves to be appreciated for it has the substance of strengthening the public's right to access information on cooperation agreement documents belonging to public bodies, although there is a minor note that the Commission cannot annul the internal decree of a public body when deciding on a dispute which is subsequently revised by the court which strengthens the Commission's stance. Public bodies do not have a strong foundation when arguing for rejection of a request for information on a cooperation agreement on the grounds that there is an internal decree prohibiting it or because there is a confidentiality clause based on the principle of pacta sunt servanda. Likewise, the public body argued that PKS documents will interfere with the interests of protecting intellectual property rights and protecting against unfair business competition which had not been a solid argument. Second, the attitude of public bodies in rejecting applications with various arguments indicates that public bodies have not implemented transparency in cooperation agreement documents.Keywords: Cooperation Agreement Documents; Pre-Employment Card Program; Transparency. AbstrakTulisan ini menganalisis sengketa informasi publik terhadap dokumen perjanjian Kerjasama (PKS) program Kartu Prakerja pada Putusan Komisi Informasi Pusat No. 013/VI/KIP-PS-A/2020 dan Putusan PTUN Jakarta No. 233/G/KI/2020/PTUN.JKT untuk melihat apakah badan publik telah menerapkan prinsip transparansi terhadap dokumen PKS. Metode yang digunakan ialah pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual dengan analisis secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan, pertama, Putusan Komisi Informasi layak diapresiasi karena bersubstansi memperkuat hak publik dalam mengakses informasi dokumen perjanjian kerjasama badan publik, meskipun terdapat catatan minor bahwa Komisi tidak dapat membatalkan SK internal badan publik ketika memutus sengketa yang kemudian direvisi oleh pengadilan dengan substansi yang menguatkan sikap Komisi. Badan publik tidak memiliki fondasi kuat ketika mendalilkan penolakan permohonan informasi perjanjian kerjasama dengan alasan telah ada SK internal yang melarang ataupun karena adanya klausul kerahasiaan berdasarkan asas pacta sunt servanda. Begitu pula argumentasi badan publik bahwa membuka dokumen PKS akan mengganggu kepentingan perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual dan perlindungan dari persaingan usaha tidak sehat bukanlah argumentasi yang solid. Kedua, adapun sikap badan publik yang menolak permohonan dengan berbagai argumen tersebut menunjukkan bahwa badan publik belum menerapkan transparansi terhadap dokumen perjanjian kerja sama.Kata Kunci: Dokumen Perjanjian Kerja Sama (PKS); Program Kartu Prakerja; Transparansi.

Kajian Putusan Pengadilan yang Membatalkan Putusan Arbitrase BANI pada Sengketa Kontrak Jasa Konstruksi Pertiwi, Putri Cahya; Nugroho, Arief Setiawan Budi; Wibowo, Richo Andi
Teras Jurnal : Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol. 14 No. 2 (2024): Volume 14 Nomor 2, September 2024
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS MALIKUSSALEH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29103/tj.v14i2.1148

Abstrak Penyelesaian sengketa kontrak konstruksi melalui arbitrase BANI pada kenyataannya tidak selalu memberikan putusan yang dapat diterima oleh para pihak yang berselisih. Dalam beberapa kasus, putusan BANI bahkan dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan. Penelitian ini mengkaji 35 putusan BANI yang diajukan permohonan pembatalan ke Pengadilan Negeri selama periode 2010 hingga 2022. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 14 putusan BANI dibatalkan oleh Pengadilan sehubungan dengan penilaian hakim yang menyatakan bahwa Arbiter kurang cermat dalam mendeteksi keberadaan unsur tipuan dalam perkara. Sementara itu kajian mendalam terhadap dua kasus pembatalan putusan BANI oleh Pengadilan menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan Hakim Pengadilan dalam menilai keabsahan dokumen yang menjadi sengketa dalam kontrak konstruksi dan mendeteksi adanya kecurangan lebih cermat dibandingkan Arbiter BANI. Namun demikian, Arbiter BANI relatif lebih baik dibanding Hakim Pengadilan dalam menilai substansi permasalahan kontrak konstruksi dan memahami permasalahan sengketanya. Kata kunci: Arbitrase, BANI, Keadilan, Kelembagaan yang Tangguh, Pembatalan Putusan, Pengadilan Abstract The resolution of construction contract disputes through BANI does not always result in decisions that are acceptable to the conflicting parties. In some cases, BANI decisions have even been overturned by the courts. This study examined 35 BANI decisions that were challenged in District Courts during the period from 2010 to 2022. The research findings indicate that 14 BANI decisions were overturned by the courts due to the judges' assessment, which stated that the Arbitrators were insufficiently diligent in detecting elements of fraud in the case. Furthermore, an in-depth review of two cases in which BANI decisions were overturned by the courts indicated that the ability of the court judges to assess the validity of the documents in construction contract disputes and detect fraud was more accurate than that of the BANI Arbitrators. Nevertheless, the BANI Arbitrators were relatively better than the Court Judges in evaluating the substance of construction contract issues and understanding the dispute issues. Keywords: Arbitration, BANI, Justice, Strong Institutions, Cancellation of Judgment, Courts

PINJAMAN MENGIKAT DAN BENTURAN KEBIJAKAN TINGKAT KOMPONEN DALAM NEGERI PADA PENGADAAN PEMERINTAH INDONESIA Hardenta, Alif Duta; Wibowo, Richo Andi
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 52, No 2 (2023): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.52.2.2023.107-118

Pinjaman luar negeri merupakan alternatif pembiayaan pengadaan pemerintah. Salah satu isu pengadaan yang didanai pinjaman adalah pinjaman mengikat (tied aid) yang berbenturan dengan kebijakan Tingkat Komponen Dalam Negeri. Penelitian normatif-empiris ini menemukan bahwa tied aid perlu dipilah menjadi dua karakteristik yaitu yang kental (concentrated tied aid) dan yang cair (diluted tied aid). Concentrated tied aid kerap terjadi di bilateral loan, sedangkan diluted tied aid lebih banyak terjadi di multilateral loan. Pinjaman dari Asian Development Bank dapat diklasifikasikan sebagai diluted tied aid karena karakter Asian Development Bank sebagai multilateral donor, dan kelonggarannya dalam isu Tingkat Komponen Dalam Negeri. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwasanya kecenderungan pemberi pinjaman berkarakteristik tied aid bukan berarti pinjaman tersebut dapat digolongkan demikian. Selain itu, pemerintah Indonesia juga telah memiliki strategi menghadapi tied aid.

Title

Found 11 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 11 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 11 Documents
Search