Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.452
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM)
Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Constitution Reposition of the 1945 Constitution in Justice Collaborators Based on Human Rights Joko Cahyono; Herman Suryokumoro; Nurini Aprilianda; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Budapest International Research and Critics Institute May
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/birci.v5i2.5702

Abstract

Arrangements for the implementation and granting of the status of collaborating witnesses or known as Justice Collaborator Which invites the issue of pros and cons about the benefits and consequences that can be used as legal commodities, as well as subjectivity in the provision of its determination. To answer the question that has become public unrest, a comprehensive interpretation of the law is needed both grammatically, historically and juridically in order to obtain an understanding of whether the legal politics in the LPSK Law which regulates the Justice Collaborator has been in accordance with the objectives in terms of uncovering the main actors and restoring state losses related to the economy and development. Furthermore, to examine why the determination of Justice Collaborator on corruption crimes does not immediately realize a social justice as in paragraph IV of the Preamble to the Republic of Indonesia Constitution Th. 1945. It is very possible that the existing norms are incomplete, so they must be reconstructed by accommodating the principles of expediency and justice while still having a progressive nature of law enforcement in order to create ideal norms.
UNSUR SUBSOSIALITAS KRIMINALISASI PERBUATAN PADA PASAL 55 DAN 56 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG AKUNTAN PUBLIK Nurini Aprilianda; Faizin Sulistio; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Arena Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2013)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (830.296 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00601.4

Abstract

Abstract This research was conducted to explore the basic idea behind the use of criminal provision in Article 55 and 56 of Act Number 5 of 2011 on Public Accountants. This search was conducted to locate and find the justification used for means of criminal law in the regulation of public accounting actions that are considered dangerous and harmful to society. This study tried to construct a theory of the use ”subsocialiteit” who was instrumental in the idea of the use of criminal law as a means of crime prevention in Act Number 5 of 2011. The results can be concluded is the basic idea of the use of criminal law in Article 55 and 56 of Act Number 5 of 2011 is based on some legislators ratio, namely: (1) Philosophically a safeguard against the profession as well as protection, (2) Provide legal certainty the public accountants and law enforcement, (3) Transparency and professionalism in making the financial statement audit, (4) Provide a deterrent effect, (5) Moral panic. The construction of the idea was based on the concept of ”subsocialiteit” and fears of harmful acts against the interests of the public accountant is realized by providing a model of criminalization that is expected to provide a balance in penal policy formulation, using a modeling and the legal principle approach (criminal). Key words: criminalization, subsociality AbstrakPenelitian ini dilakukan untuk menelusuri ide dasar yang melatarbelakangi penggunaan ketentuan pidana dalam Pasal 55 dan 56  Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011 tentang Akuntan Publik. Penelusuran ini dilakukan untuk mencari dan menemukan dasar pembenaran yang digunakan untuk menggunakan sarana hukum pidana dalam pengaturan perbuatan akuntan publik yang dianggap berbahaya dan merugikan masyarakat. Penelitian ini mencoba mengkonstruksi penggunaan “teori subsosialitas” yang sangat berperan dalam ide pengunaan hukum pidana sebagai sarana penanggulangan kejahatan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011. Hasil  yang dapat disimpulkan adalah ide dasar penggunaan hukum pidana dalam Pasal 55 dan 56 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2011 didasarkan pada beberapa rasio legis, yaitu: (1)Secara filosofis merupakan upaya perlindungan terhadap masyarakat sekaligus perlindungan profesi; (2)Memberikan kepastian hukum kepada akuntan publik dan penegak hukum; (3)Transparansi dan profesionalitas dalam pembuatan audit laporan keuangan; (4)Memberikan efek jera; (5)Kepanikan moral. Kontruksi terhadap ide yang disandarkan kepada konsep subsosialitas dan kekhawatiran akan berbahaya perbuatan akuntan publik terhadap kepentingan masyarakat diwujudkan dengan memberikan model kriminalisasi yang diharapkan memberikan keseimbangan dalam formulasi kebijakan penal, yaitu dengan menggunakan model pendekatan keseimbangan dan asas hukum (pidana).Kata kunci: kriminalisasi, subsosialitas
ASET SEBAGAI SUBJEK HUKUM DALAM UPAYA PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 3 No 6 (2024): IJHESS JUNE 2024
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v3i6.1007

Abstract

Corruption is a problem that results in high financial and economic losses in Indonesia. UNCAC has launched recommendations for countries to make arrangements regarding Non-Conviction Based asset Forfeiture (NCB) since 2003 which aims to recover maximum state financial losses. This is based on the fact that the state losses recovered are not proportional to the state financial losses incurred due to corruption crimes. The research used is normative juridical with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and comparison with other countries. The conception of assets as legal subjects in the NCB is based on the theory of legal fiction where assets in their position as legal subjects make them seem "guilty" when the way of use or the process of obtaining them is against the law. Assets in this case are considered to be able to perform a legal act that can be accounted for as happened in several cases in the United States, the Philippines, Thailand, not to mention Indonesia. Thus, because it focuses on the "fault" of the object, asset forfeiture can still be carried out even though the object or asset has changed hands. Legislation in Indonesia has actually adopted the concept of NCB, but it does not fulfill the basic essence of the concept where the goal is to recover state losses arising from corruption maximally and quickly. Therefore, laws governing asset forfeiture must be made specifically to accommodate this, one of which is through the bill on asset forfeiture.
Prospects for the Application of Unexplained Wealth Order in the Forfeiture of Assets Proceeds of Corruption in Indonesia hakim, Ikhwanulhakim; Setiawan Noerdajasakti; Yuliati Yuliati
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 4 No 2 (2024): IJHESS OCTOBER 2024
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v4i2.1090

Abstract

This research focuses on discussing two things, namely (1) how the legal politics of regulating asset forfeiture for corruption crimes in Indonesia and (2) what are the prospects for applying the unexplained wealth order in asset forfeiture for corruption crimes in Indonesia. in this study it was found that: first, the legal politics of asset forfeiture for corruption crimes in Indonesia is still mainly oriented towards the process of asset forfeiture based on conviction, asset forfeiture can only be carried out if there is a judge's decision that is legally binding. However, if in the course of a criminal case there are difficulties in proof, the defendant dies in the judicial process, and after a court decision with permanent legal force it is known that there are assets or assets owned by the perpetrator that are the proceeds of crime, a civil lawsuit can be filed. however, it is different from the concept of unexplained wealth contained in the Criminal Asset Forfeiture Bill which has a broader dimension of civil filing.  And the filing of a civil lawsuit is not an alternative to the criminal justice process. Asset forfeiture lawsuits through the criminal process can be filed before, during and after criminal judgements, in order to avoid obfuscation and the disappearance and conversion of assets resulting from corruption crimes. Secondly, the prospect of implementing unexplained wealth in Indonesia has existed through the establishment and drafting of the Criminal Asset Forfeiture Bill. However, this bill is not equipped with the obligation to reverse the burden of proof, which is identical to the proof of ownership of assets contained in the Anti-Corruption Law. In the future, it is necessary to equalise the reversal of the burden of proof that should be carried out by the owner of the asset to facilitate the proof process and assist the legal apparatus.
THE URGENCY OF CRIMINALIZING SURROGATE MOTHER PRACTICES REVIEWED FROM INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW Putri Carera Santi Romauli Simamora; Prija Djatmika; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2868

Abstract

The advancement of science goes hand in hand with the development of increasingly varied community needs, requiring the law to continue to be dynamic in order to keep pace with these developments. So that with the advancement of technology and the development of science in the health sector, it is hoped that it can help support the welfare and health of mankind. But in this case, the question arises whether Indonesian law has accommodated technological advances in the health sector, especially in terms of the implementation of surrogate mothers. In Indonesia, the regulation regarding the inability of surrogate mothers is still not explicitly regulated in the law so that it still seems vague, both in terms of its regulation and in terms of its sanctions. Using a normative legal research method, this study analyzes whether according to Indonesian positive law, the practice of surrogate mother can be criminalized.
The Weak Role of Prosecutors in Designating Justice Collaborators in Indonesia Nugraha Ardi Setiawan; Setiawan Noerdajasakti; Faizin Sulistio
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 5 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v5i3.285

Abstract

Crime is a phenomenon that has infiltrated into communal life. One type of crime resulting from this development is criminal activities carried out in collusion or groups, meticulously planned, and referred to as organized crime. This type of crime can be categorized as an extraordinary or extraordinary crime because it is considered more extreme than ordinary crimes. In organized crime, perpetrators form a group that employs various detailed and synchronized methods to obtain money, power, or other objectives. Examples of organized crime include corrupt groups, robbery conspiracies, and even groups of murderers. This should prompt law enforcement agencies to undertake new efforts to address and combat this type of crime, and one of the means employed can be through the Criminal Justice System network.
COMPARISON OF THE JUDICIAL FORGIVENESS (RECHTERLIJK PARDON) BETWEEN CIVIL LAW SYSTEM AND ISLAMIC LAW SYSTEM (FINDING THE FORMULATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF RECHTERLIJK PARDON IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW) Budimansyah; Prija Djatmika; Rachmad Safa’at; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): July
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i4.946

Abstract

This study falls under the category of normative legal research or doctrinal legal research. Primary legal resources, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials are all used library research techniques for gathering legal materials (library research). In contrast, the descriptive analysis approach is used for data processing. According to the conclusions of this study, various civil law system nations, like the Netherlands, Greece, and Portugal, use the principle of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon). However, long before these nations implemented the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in their criminal law, Islamic criminal law used principle of forgiveness first in jarimah qadzaf (accusing adultery), jarimah qishas-diyat, and jarimah Ta'zir. Compared to the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in the civil law system, the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in Islamic criminal law offers benefits. The formulation of the principle of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in Indonesian criminal law in the future is to prescribe the principle of judicial forgiveness in Islamic criminal law since it is seen to have advantages. Furthermore, incorporating the notion of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) from Islamic criminal law into Indonesian criminal law is sociologically consistent with the legal knowledge of the Indonesian people, the majority of whom are Muslims.
Legal and Criminological Analysis of Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Supreme Court Cassation Decision Aria Perkasa Utama; Setiawan Noerdajasakti; Fachrizal Afandi
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.345

Abstract

The development of financial technology through blockchain-based crypto assets has given rise to new patterns of economic crime, particularly money laundering offenses. The decentralized, anonymous, and cross-jurisdictional characteristics of crypto assets make them an effective means of concealing the illicit origin of criminal proceeds. Within the national legal framework, the regulation of money laundering under Law Number 8 of 2010 has not explicitly accommodated crypto asset transactions, resulting in normative gaps and legal uncertainty. These issues are reflected in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Cassation Decision Number 2029 K/Pid.Sus/2023 concerning Indra Kesuma, also known as Indra Kenz. This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning underlying judicial decisions in money laundering cases involving crypto asset-based schemes and to formulate regulatory reform of money laundering laws based on a cyber criminology approach. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that judges adopted a progressive interpretation of Article 1 paragraph (1), Article 3, and Article 4 of the Anti-Money Laundering Law by qualifying crypto assets as proceeds of crime. The cyber criminology approach underscores the necessity of digital evidentiary systems and a comprehensive understanding of blockchain technology. Furthermore, existing regulations remain inadequate, necessitating normative reform that includes the definition of crypto assets, obligations for reporting suspicious transactions, and the integration of on-chain Know Your Customer (KYC) mechanisms to ensure legal certainty and effective law enforcement.
Co-Authors Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh Aria Perkasa Utama Budimansyah Fachrizal Afandi Faizin Sulistio hakim, Ikhwanulhakim Herman Suryokumoro Joko Cahyono Nugraha Ardi Setiawan Nurini Aprilianda Prija Djatmika Putri Carera Santi Romauli Simamora Rachmad Safa’at Yuliati Yuliati