Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.99
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM)
Setiawan Noerdajasakti
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
COMPARISON OF THE JUDICIAL FORGIVENESS (RECHTERLIJK PARDON) BETWEEN CIVIL LAW SYSTEM AND ISLAMIC LAW SYSTEM (FINDING THE FORMULATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF RECHTERLIJK PARDON IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL LAW) Budimansyah; Prija Djatmika; Rachmad Safa’at; Setiawan Noerdajasakti
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): July
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i4.946

Abstract

This study falls under the category of normative legal research or doctrinal legal research. Primary legal resources, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials are all used library research techniques for gathering legal materials (library research). In contrast, the descriptive analysis approach is used for data processing. According to the conclusions of this study, various civil law system nations, like the Netherlands, Greece, and Portugal, use the principle of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon). However, long before these nations implemented the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in their criminal law, Islamic criminal law used principle of forgiveness first in jarimah qadzaf (accusing adultery), jarimah qishas-diyat, and jarimah Ta'zir. Compared to the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in the civil law system, the principle of forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in Islamic criminal law offers benefits. The formulation of the principle of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) in Indonesian criminal law in the future is to prescribe the principle of judicial forgiveness in Islamic criminal law since it is seen to have advantages. Furthermore, incorporating the notion of judicial forgiveness (rechterlijk pardon) from Islamic criminal law into Indonesian criminal law is sociologically consistent with the legal knowledge of the Indonesian people, the majority of whom are Muslims.
SENTENCING OF CHILD OFFENDERS UNDER 14 YEARS OLD IN CASES OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE VICTIM Geraldo Gracelo Mario Situmeang; Setiawan Noerdajasakti; Abdul Madjid
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i3.2823

Abstract

The imposition of sanctions on child offenders under 14 years old in cases of sexual violence against children presents a legal dilemma between protecting the child offender and upholding the rights of the victim. Law No. 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Justice System (Law on Juvenile Justice System) stipulates that children under 14 years old may only be subjected to measures, while Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes (Law on Sexual Violence Crimes) emphasizes victim protection and recovery. This article examines the imbalance between these two regulations and analyzes the most appropriate sanctions based on the principle of the best interests of the victim. Using a normative juridical approach and case studies, it is found that while the Law on Juvenile Justice System aims to protect child offenders from the adverse effects of criminal sanctions, in cases of sexual violence against children, this approach risks neglecting victims’ rights. Therefore, a more flexible legal interpretation is needed to ensure that sanctions not only focus on the offender but also consider justice for the victim.
Legal and Criminological Analysis of Cryptocurrency Money Laundering in Supreme Court Cassation Decision Aria Perkasa Utama; Setiawan Noerdajasakti; Fachrizal Afandi
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 4 (2026): March In Progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i4.345

Abstract

The development of financial technology through blockchain-based crypto assets has given rise to new patterns of economic crime, particularly money laundering offenses. The decentralized, anonymous, and cross-jurisdictional characteristics of crypto assets make them an effective means of concealing the illicit origin of criminal proceeds. Within the national legal framework, the regulation of money laundering under Law Number 8 of 2010 has not explicitly accommodated crypto asset transactions, resulting in normative gaps and legal uncertainty. These issues are reflected in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Cassation Decision Number 2029 K/Pid.Sus/2023 concerning Indra Kesuma, also known as Indra Kenz. This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning underlying judicial decisions in money laundering cases involving crypto asset-based schemes and to formulate regulatory reform of money laundering laws based on a cyber criminology approach. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that judges adopted a progressive interpretation of Article 1 paragraph (1), Article 3, and Article 4 of the Anti-Money Laundering Law by qualifying crypto assets as proceeds of crime. The cyber criminology approach underscores the necessity of digital evidentiary systems and a comprehensive understanding of blockchain technology. Furthermore, existing regulations remain inadequate, necessitating normative reform that includes the definition of crypto assets, obligations for reporting suspicious transactions, and the integration of on-chain Know Your Customer (KYC) mechanisms to ensure legal certainty and effective law enforcement.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Abdul Madjid Achmad Rilyadi Sholeh Aria Perkasa Utama Budimansyah David Mangaraja Lumban Batu Fachrizal Afandi Faizin Sulistio Geraldo Gracelo Mario Situmeang hakim, Ikhwanulhakim Herman Suryokumoro Jessyca Fatmawaty Hutagalung Joko Cahyono Muhammad Hanif Ramadhan Negoro, Bodro Aji Nugraha Ardi Setiawan Nurini Aprilianda Prija Djatmika Rachmad Safa’at Simamora, Putri Carera Santi Romauli Yuliati Yuliati