Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JUSTISI Journal of Law Justice Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Jati Emas (Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik dan Pengabdian Masyarakat)
akhmad faqih mursid
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Perjanjian Kredit Yang Mencantumkan Kausula Asuransi Jiwa akhmad faqih mursid
JUSTISI Vol. 4 No. 2 (2018): Juli 2018
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v4i2.536

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, menganalisis dan menjelaskan penerapan hukum terhadap para pihak dengan dicantumkannya klausula asuransi jiwa dalam perjanjian kredit.Berdasarkan penelitian dan Pembahasan, maka penulis menyimpulkan Dalam asuransi jiwa kita mengenal 3 (tiga) pihak yaitu penanggung, tertanggung (debitur yang menanggungkan jiwanya), penikmat (ahli wari atau yang diperjanjikan). Ketiga pihak bila disederhanakan lagi menjadi, debitur, kreditur, dan perusahaan asuransi. Asuransi jiwa yang merupakan salah satu contoh asuransi dengan biaya tertentu yang mana penggantian risiko tidak akan sesuai dengan risiko yang dialaminya.Kematian merupakan evenemen dalam asuransi jiwa, yang menimbulkan hak dan kewajiban bagi para pihak. Pada umumnya ketika tertanggung meninggal dunia maka penanggung mempunyai kewajiban untuk memberikan ganti rugi kepada penikmat (ahli waris) kecuali diperjanjikan lain. Misalnya pihak debitur menyetujui klausula yang diberikan oleh pihak bank, berisikan kerja sama dengan pihak asuransi jiwa untuk menanggulangi risiko yang terjadi. Jadi dalam hal ini pihak bank bertindak sebagai pemegang polis (penerima) ganti kerugian.
Chemical Castration as a Punishment for Child Rapists from a Human Rights Perspective: An Analysis of Judgment No. 859/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Bjm Gratsya Defretes; Akhmad Faqih Mursid
Journal of Law Justice (JLJ) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Law Justice
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jlj.v4i2.5438

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of chemical castration as a punishment for child rapists from a human rights perspective, focusing on Court Decision No. 859/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Bjm as the subject of the study, as well as its compliance with the principle of humanity. The method used in this study is a descriptive-analytical normative legal method employing both a statutory approach and a case-based approach, involving a qualitative analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The novelty of this study lies in its specific examination of the judge’s reasoning in imposing chemical castration on the perpetrator in Judgment No. 859/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Bjm, as well as the relationship between regulations and judicial practice, which has not been extensively studied. The results of the study indicate that the imposition of chemical castration as an additional penalty for the perpetrator of child rape in the aforementioned judgment is normatively intended to protect the victim, in this case the child, and to prevent the recurrence of similar criminal acts. However, this has become controversial from a human rights perspective because it pertains to the perpetrator’s right to bodily integrity, as stipulated in Law No. 39 of 1999 and Articles 28G through 28J of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Furthermore, in this ruling, the imposition of chemical castration on the perpetrator was also based on the judge’s subjective considerations without regard to the cumulative requirements for restricting rights under Law No. 17 of 2016, Article 81, paragraph (7), resulting in inconsistencies that potentially violate the principle of proportionality between statutory regulations and judicial practice. The conclusion of this study is that chemical castration sentences not based on clear legal provisions and human rights standards have the potential to create inconsistencies in the application of the law and violate the principle of proportionality regarding the offender’s right to bodily integrity.
Advocacy Assistance for Patients' Families' Civil Law Rights in Alleged Medical Disputes in Sorong City: Pendampingan Advokasi Hak Keperdataan Keluarga Pasien pada Dugaan Sengketa Medis di Kota Sorong Hasriyanti Hasriyanti; Nurul Fajeriana; Muhammad Arifin Abd. Kadir; Hadi Tuasikal; Akhmad Faqih Mursid; Mulyadi Golap
JATI EMAS (Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik dan Pengabdian Masyarakat) Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Jati Emas (Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik dan Pengabdian Masyarakat)
Publisher : DPD Jatim Perkumpulan Dosen Indonesia Semesta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36339/je.v10i3.568

Abstract

The right to information and access to medical records constitutes a fundamental component of patients' civil law rights as guaranteed under Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health in Indonesia. However, information asymmetry between healthcare providers and patients and their families in alleged medical disputes continues to limit public understanding of legal rights and appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms. This Community Service Program aimed to enhance the legal literacy of patients' families regarding their right to information and access to medical records while strengthening their bargaining position through a non-litigation advocacy approach. The program involved six family members of a patient facing an alleged medical dispute in Sorong City. The implementation consisted of three stages: preparation, advocacy, and evaluation. The preparation stage involved identifying legal facts through in-depth interviews and document analysis. The advocacy stage included legal counseling, communication assistance, and facilitation of requests for information and access to medical records from healthcare providers. The evaluation stage assessed improvements in participants' legal understanding and the progress of the advocacy process. The results showed that the advocacy assistance improved the legal understanding of all six participants regarding patients' civil law rights, strengthened their ability to exercise their rights to information and medical records in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and promoted more constructive communication with healthcare providers. This community service program demonstrates that civil law rights-based advocacy assistance is an effective community empowerment strategy for supporting more transparent, equitable, and patient-centered resolution of alleged medical disputes.
BATAS KEWENANGAN HAKIM DALAM REKONSTRUKSI GUGATAN PERDATA: ANTARA ASAS HAKIM PASIF DAN INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DALAM SENGKETA TANAH Hasriyanti Hasriyanti; Mulyadi Golap; Akhmad Faqih Mursid
Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DaLRev) Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Datuk Sulaiman Law Review (DalRev)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/dalrev.v7i1.12273

Abstract

Land disputes have a distinctive procedural character because the disputed object must be precisely identifiable in terms of location, area, boundaries, and legal status. Problems arise when discrepancies occur between the posita, petitum, land documents, and the factual condition of the land. On the one hand, the passive judge principle and the prohibition of ultra petita under Article 178 paragraph (3) HIR and Article 189 paragraph (3) RBg require judges to remain within the scope of the dispute submitted by the parties. On the other hand, judicial independence, the obligation to explore legal values and justice, and the need to produce an executable judgment require judges not to be mechanically bound by merely technical errors in pleadings. This research examines the limits of judicial authority in reconstructing civil claims in land disputes and formulates parameters distinguishing legitimate reconstruction from ultra petita. This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are analyzed prescriptively by comparing legislation, legal doctrine, and Supreme Court decisions. The research finds that the passive judge principle should not be interpreted absolutely in relation to technical and identificatory aspects of the disputed object. Reconstruction is legitimate when it merely clarifies the identity of the object, does not expand the scope of the dispute, and does not create a new right or form of relief. Conversely, substantive changes to the parties, object, or relief constitute ultra petita. This study proposes a Three-Test Model, consisting of the Identity Test, Scope Test, and Relief Test, as a framework for bounded judicial activism in land disputes. Keywords: Civil Procedure; Judicial Independence; Land Disputes; Judicial Reconstruction; Passive Judge Principle; Ultra Petita.
Co-Authors Golap, Mulyadi Gratsya Defretes Hasriyanti Hasriyanti Muhammad Arifin Abd Kadir Nurul Fajeriana M Tuasikal, Hadi