Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kedokteran Brawijaya Jurnal Kebidanan Midwiferia Sari Pediatri Majalah Kesehatan FKUB Pediatric Sciences Journal
Saptadi Yuliarto
Lab/SMF Ilmu Kesehatan Anak Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Brawihaya, RS dr. Saiful Anwar Malang
Health Professions Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Pediatric Sciences Journal

 1 
The Effectiveness of Analgesics in Pain Treatment in Critically Ill Children: a Literature Review Taufiq Kadafi, Kurniawan; Yuliarto, Saptadi; Jihan Ruhi Said, Astika; Khalasha, Takhta
Pediatric Sciences Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): (Available online: 1 December 2023)
Publisher : Medical Faculty of Brawijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51559/pedscij.v4i2.71

Abstract

Adequate pain management is an important and common requirement in health care in pediatric intensive care units. There are many pain assessment scales in children based on the literature, but the guidelines for using pain scales as a guide in pain management have not been widely discussed. One of the most common pain interventions is to provide opioid or non-opioid analgesics. Analgesic drugs given to critically ill children can provide different anti-pain outcomes when measured by a pain scale. Therefore, this literature review will compare the effectiveness of analgesics in pain management in critically ill children.
The effect of breastfeeding compared with formula milk on the growth of infants with congenital heart disease: Evidence-based case report Melinda; Permadi, Prasetya Ismail; Yuliarto, Saptadi; Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq; Koentartiwi, Dyahris; Rahmadany, Aulya Farra; Fauzi, Muhammad Rizki; Muharrom, Muhammad Aji
Pediatric Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Available online : 1 June 2025
Publisher : Medical Faculty of Brawijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51559/pedscij.v6i1.123

Abstract

Introduction: Children with Congenital Heart Disease are at high risk of feeding and growth problems. Nutrition practices for children with CHD still vary widely across institutions, including breastfeeding. This study aims to conduct a critical review to compare the effects of breastfeeding versus formula on the growth of infants with congenital heart disease. Methods: The article search was conducted online using the PubMed, EBSCO, and ProQuest databases with the keywords “Congenital Heart Disease,” “Human Milk,” “Formula,” and “Growth.” Result: Two articles were obtained in the form of systematic review studies. Results of the study stated that in infants with CHD with breastfeeding compared to formula milk Weight for age score is better with breastfeeding because breast milk is easier to digest Conclusion. Breast milk has been shown to have significant benefits on the growth of infants with CHD compared to formula, especially in terms of weight-for-age z-score.
Comparison of tolerance of peptide-based formula versus standard formula on outcome of critically ill children: an evidence-based case report Permadi, Prasetya I.; Melinda; Yuliarto, Saptadi; Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq; Koentartiwi, Dyahris; Putra, Galing C.
Pediatric Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): In Press Online : December 2025
Publisher : Medical Faculty of Brawijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51559/pedscij.v6i2.122

Abstract

Introduction. The clinical benefit of peptide-based formulas remains controversial in critically ill children. Objective. To conduct a critical review to compare the effects of peptide-based versus standard polymeric formulas on feeding tolerance and whether this would affect outcomes in critically ill children. Methods. An online search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) databases using the keywords “Peptide-based Formula,” “Standard Formula,” “Critically ill Children,” and “Enteral Feeding.” Results. Three articles were found: a case-control study and two prospective cohort studies. The results of the case-control study suggested that critically ill patients receiving peptide-based formulas showed significant reductions in feeding disturbances and abdominal distension and achieved full enteral feedings sooner compared with patients receiving standard formulas. The results of the first prospective cohort study showed that the peptide-based formula was better tolerated than the standard formula in children after bowel surgery, and the second study stated that choosing the peptide-based formula as the first prescription for enteral nutrition was associated with higher severity of clinical conditions in patients. Conclusion. The peptide-based formula was better tolerated than the standard polymeric formula in critically ill pediatric patients.
Co-Authors Agustin Iskandar Edi Widjajanto Ery Olivianto Fauzi, Muhammad Rizki Hapsari, Pradita Tri Harjoedi Adji Tjahjono, Harjoedi Adji HMS Chandra Kusuma Husnul Asariati Iin Tri Listiyanti Nugrahani Jihan Ruhi Said, Astika Khalasha, Takhta Koentartiwi, Dyahris Krisjentha Iffah Agustasari Kurniawan Taufiq Kadafi Melinda Muharrom, Muhammad Aji Permadi, Prasetya I. Permadi, Prasetya Ismail Putra, Galing C. Rahmadany, Aulya Farra Rahmawati Aminingrum Rosari, M Angelina de Sayyaf Haydar, Farel Muhammad