Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.81
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, dan Entrepreneurship eCo-Buss Ilomata International Journal of Tax and Accounting Ilomata International Journal of Management Ilomata International Journal of Social Science International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Accounting and Finance Studies Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi IJLSH Ipso Jure
Bustani, Bustani
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Nasional Banjarmasin
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Ipso Jure

 1 
Reconstruction of Notary examination mechanism as a witness in the investigation phase after the Constitutional Court decision Number 49 / PUU-X/2012 Bustani, Bustani
Ipso Jure Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Ipso Jure - March
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/x8k1ef88

Abstract

The position of the Notary as a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds places him in a strategic position in the civil law proof system as well as in the criminal law enforcement process. In practice, it is not uncommon for a notary to be called and checked at the stage of the investigation regarding the deed drawn up by him. This study aims to analyze the concept of notary position in the investigation process as well as the mechanism of summoning and examination of notaries as witnesses after the decision of the Constitutional Court decision Number 49/PUU-X/2012. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach, especially to the Notary Office Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The results showed that notaries can be called as witnesses, experts, or related parties, but still bound by the obligation to maintain the confidentiality of the position. After the Constitutional Court decision, the mechanism for calling notaries must still pay attention to the principle of protecting positions through special procedures as stipulated in Article 66 of the UUJN. Therefore, a balance is needed between the authority of investigators in uncovering criminal acts and the protection of the dignity and independence of the notary profession in order to ensure certainty, justice, and legal expediency.
Co-Authors Abdul Kadir MS Ahmad Yunani Asrid Juniar Burhannudin Burhannudin Dian Primadara Fifi Swandari Firdaus Firdaus Hayati, Diana Hazimi Abdullah Cut Agam Jumangin, Jumangin Khuzaini Khuzaini Kurniaty Kurniaty Mailiana, Mailiana Mohdari Mohdari, Mohdari Muammar Khaddafi Muhammad Chairullah Nasrullah Nasrullah Rahmi Widyanti Rico Nur Ilham Rina Fitri Sartika, Riska