Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Untuk Masyarakat Di Wilayah Sempadan Pantai Kelurahan Untia Kecamatan Biringkanaya Kota Makassar M. Alif Usman; Syahruddin Nawi; Abdul Qahar
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v3i3.3187

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui status hak atas tanah di atas sempadan pantai Kelurahan Untia Kecamatan Biringkanaya Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini bersifat empiris yuridis, yakni menganalisis ketentuan-ketentuan hukum dan kebijakan-kebijakan pemerintah yang berhubungan dengan status hak atas tanah di atas sempadan pantai Kelurahan Untia Kecamatan Biringkanaya Kota Makassar. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan pengumpulan data primer dan data sekunder. Selanjutnya data yang diperoleh dianalisis secara kualitatif kemudian dipaparkan secara dekskriptif.Hasil Penelitian Potensi pemanfaatan lahan sebagai pusat aktivitas kemaritiman ditunjang oleh adanya landmark institusi pendidikan berbasis ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi maritim yang berskala global yakni Politeknik Ilmu Pelayaran (PIP) dan perkampungan masyarakat nelayan. Implikasi status hak atas tanah pada kawasan sempadan pantai adalah tidak diperbolehkan mendirikan bangunan pada kawasan sempadan pantai yang disebutkan dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 26 Tahun 2008 Tentang Rencan Tata Ruang Wilayah Nasional. Jika dikaitkan, hal ini tidak sesuai dengan peraturan yang ada pada Peraturan Daerah No. 4 Tahun 2015 Tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Kota Makassar Tahun 2015-2034.
The Failure of State Oversight of Umrah Pilgrimage Organizers: An Analysis of Ministerial Accountability and Reformulation of the Regulatory Oversight Model Adam Hidayat; Z. Zainuddin; Abdul Qahar
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): July - December
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v6i1.2385

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the failure of state oversight of Umrah pilgrimage organizers, emphasizing the accountability of the Ministry of Religious Affairs and the need for a more effective and equitable reformulation of the regulatory oversight model. The study focuses on how the existing supervisory structure has failed to prevent violations, and how these weaknesses impact the protection of pilgrims as users of religious services. This study uses a normative legal method with a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, analyzed descriptively and prescriptively to identify legal problems and formulate normative solutions. The results indicate that the existing supervisory system is still administrative and formalistic, thus unable to reach the substantive aspects of Umrah implementation. This failure of supervision is characterized by a weak preventive function, delays in detecting violations, and suboptimal law enforcement. Furthermore, the ministry's accountability has not been optimal, as reflected in a lack of transparency, responsiveness, and limited public participation in the supervisory process. This condition indicates an imbalance between state authority and the effectiveness of its implementation. The findings of this study emphasize the need for a reformulation of the risk- and accountability-based oversight model, which integrates transparency, public participation, and the use of technology into the oversight system. This would ensure that oversight is not merely reactive but also capable of preventive and adaptive functions. This reform is expected to create a more effective oversight system, enhance ministry accountability, and provide optimal protection for the public.
Fragmentation of Investment Regulations in Indonesia: An Analysis of Normative Disharmony and the Reform Agenda from an Investment Certainty Perspective Irwan Hasan; La Ode Husen; Abdul Qahar
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): July - December
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v6i1.2389

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the fragmentation of investment regulations in Indonesia, emphasizing the identification of forms of normative disharmony and formulating a regulatory reform agenda from an investment certainty perspective. The main focus of the study is to examine the extent to which the lack of synchronization between laws and regulations, both vertically and horizontally, impacts the effectiveness of the national investment legal system. The research method used is normative legal research with a library research approach and a systematic literature review, supported by a regulatory approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach. Data analysis techniques are descriptive-prescriptive to outline legal issues and provide normative recommendations. The results show that regulatory fragmentation occurs due to the complexity of the multi-layered legal system, weak institutional coordination, and inconsistencies in norms across sectors and levels of government. This disharmony gives rise to normative conflicts, overlapping authorities, and unclear legal terminology, which have resulted in increased legal uncertainty, transaction costs, and investment risks. Furthermore, the regulatory reforms that have been implemented have not been fully effective due to obstacles in harmonization and implementation. The research findings confirm the need for comprehensive and integrated regulatory reform through legal harmonization, institutional strengthening, and optimization of technology-based licensing systems to create legal certainty and increase national investment competitiveness.