Articles
<![CDATA[STIMULUS EKSPOR TERHADAP KINERJA PERUSAHAAN-PERUSAHAAN BATIK ]]>
<![CDATA[Darmansyah, Darmansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Soebagyo, Daryono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 11, No 2 (2010): JEP Desember 2010 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This study analyzes batik export performance in ex Karesidenan Surakarta. The Researcher links the export stimulus and toward export strategy and also to the impact of ex- port stimulus, and export strategy on export performance. The purpose of this study is to explain the relationship between export stimulus and toward the export strategy. This study is also aiming at explaining about the relation of the export stimulus, and export strategy toward export performance of Batik Company. The location of this study was in Ex Karesidenan of Surakarta. The total samples of this research were 108 companies but only 104 companies which could be investigated. The significant finding of this study is that the aid of market information from domestic/local government and importer and their political stability (environmental aspect) will improve the export performance. The strong willingness of the company managers to explore the existing resources owned by the companies will support the export performance (impulse factor).]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KOMPETENSI PRODUK UNGGULAN DAERAH PADA BATIK TULIS DAN CAP SOLO DI DATI II KOTA SURAKARTA ]]>
<![CDATA[Soebagiyo, Daryono]]>;
<![CDATA[Wahyudi, M.]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 9, No 2 (2008): JEP Desember 2008 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This research concerning local prominent product competency of âbatik tulisâ and âbatik capâ in Surakarta. Two kinds of these batik are production of small and middle scale industry (IKM Batik) where IKM Batik has became one of economy prime acti-vator in Surakarta. In this research, writers apply research methods as follows: Bayes approach technique for getting priority prominent product rank, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) by using Expert Choice Software, with aim to know prominent competency of IKM in Surakarta, and Value Chain Economic Analysis started with chain mapping to priority prominent product which appertained as main rank. Research result indicates that competency approach in local industrial devel-opment relevant enough for increasing local competitiveness and finally increasing national competitiveness. It can be happened considering that competency approach try to exploit local excess and excellence uniquely.]]>
<![CDATA[ISU STRATEGI PEMBIAYAAN DEFISIT ANGGARAN DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Soebagiyo, Daryono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 13, No 2 (2012): JEP Desember 2012 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The issue of budget deficit financing strategy has been broad enough to gain attention in macroeconomic policy. This study is focused on Analysis of Budget Deficit Financing in Indonesia. How is the deficit financing management implemented such as what are the best sources and its contribution to the Indonesian economy. The study explains that the model used to estimate the impact indicators is capable to manage budget deficit financing, in which the variable domestic financing and external debt encourages the economic growth. Another research goal is to identify the amount of deficit financing sources and their effects on the economy. Under normal conditions in simulation 2. by increasing foreign financing about 15 percent, economic growth will increase about 1.40 percent, and inflation will fall about 0.11. In the crisis where the interest rate increased 15 percent and domestic financing increased with the same rate, economic growth will fall 0.08 and inflation 0.01 percent.]]>
<![CDATA[KAUSALITAS GRANGER PDRB TERHADAP KESEMPATAN KERJA DI PROVINSI DATI I JAWA TENGAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Soebagiyo, Daryono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 8, No 2 (2007): JEP Desember 2007 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This research conducted to know the relation of causality between Regional Gross Domestic Products (PDRB) and level of employment. Research method which applied is Granger causality test. Then to get estimation result, done testing stationerity, integration degree testing by using ADF (Augmented Dickey Fuller), and testing cointegration by using ADF. Data in the research is time series data from year 1979 up to 2004. Analysis result gives conclusion that found unidirectional causality relation from Regional Gross Domestic Product (PDRB) to employment level.]]>
<![CDATA[Implications and Competitiveness of Regions on Regional Development of Central Java ]]>
<![CDATA[Soebagiyo, Daryono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 15, No 2 (2014): JEP Desember 2014 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Regional Competitiveness be one of the issues in regional development policy since the enactment of regional autonomy. Based on the results of the efficiency analysis found 11 areas of the city and district have the efficiency and 4 districts do not have the efficiency. Regional Competitiveness in Central Java based Comparative Advantage and Competitive known regions that have a high comparative and competitive advantages consist of 4 areas. Regional Mapping Based on Efficiency and Productivity Local known areas that have high efficiency and productivity which consists of 4 areas. Based Competitive Advantage Regional Productivity is high and not found. Under the Regional Competitiveness and Regional Productivity high was not found. Based on Comparative Advantage and Regional Development area there are 4 high. Based Competitive Advantage and Regional Development of high there are 2 areas. Based on Regional Productivity and Regional Development of high there are 2 counties and cities]]>
<![CDATA[Regional Competitiveness and Its Implications for Development ]]>
<![CDATA[Soebagyo, Daryono]]>;
<![CDATA[Triyono, Triyono]]>;
<![CDATA[Cahyono, Yuli Tri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 14, No 2 (2013): JEP Desember 2013 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This study was conducted to identify regional competitiveness in some areas of Central Java. Regional competitiveness became one of the issues in regional development policy since the enactment of local autonomy.Measurement of regional competitiveness has been mostly done through ranking as a benchmark the competitiveness of the region. Mapping regional competitiveness in Indonesia has been made to all counties and cities, which shows the competitiveness ranking of each region. Competitiveness ranking is based on the characteristics of the area assessed the competitiveness of the input and output competitiveness. Even though the mapping of regional competitiveness in Central Java in particular has never been done, but the result of the national and regional competitiveness can be used as a reference to determine the ranking of each district / town in Central Java. Distribution competitiveness ranking the 15 districts / cities in Central Java can be grouped based on input competitiveness and the competitiveness of output.]]>
<![CDATA[Leading Sectors 15 Countries-District in Central Java ]]>
<![CDATA[Soebagyo, Daryono]]>;
<![CDATA[Hascaryo, Arifin Sri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 17, No 1 (2016): JEP June 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Sectors of the economy are vital to the economic growth of a region. A sector can be said to be high productivity levels and if the sector is able to absorb a large workforce and the use of human resources as efficiently as possible. Each area has advantages in certain sectors which could be a contributor to economic growth. This study was conducted to determine and explain the influence of the areas that have a particular advantage to economic growth. Measurements using the Location Quotient leading sectors, whereas the determinant analysis using panel data. This research is expected to know the areas that have the basic sector and determine its impact on economic growth in Central Java. An area is said to have a dominant sector if it has a score of more than 1 and is said not to have if less than 1. The sample used in this study are 15 city / county for the years from 2007 to 2011. The results of the analysis using the LQ shows that in 2007-2011 there were about eight areas that excel in the agricultural sector, 9 in the industrial and commercial sector.]]>
<![CDATA[DISPARITAS PEMBANGUNAN DAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHINYA (STUDI KASUS DI DAERAH SUMBAGSEL) ]]>
<![CDATA[Soebagiyo, Daryono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 1, No 1 (2000) : JEP Juni 2000 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23917/jep.v1i1.3890
<![CDATA[This is well illustrated by recent research into inter-regional development growth disparities. Some researchers have followed the Neoclassical route, emphasizing the role of the Williamson Index, and then can be expressed relationship in general form that in regression and correlation coefficient analysis involving time series data. The objectives of this research was to preview the classification development of disparities and influence factors in the late five years during 1992-1996, case study in SUMBAGSEL. The Analysis can be calculated to measure the government revenue, income regional and contributed tax sectors.]]>
<![CDATA[MODEL PERENCANAAN EKONOMI MELALUI METODE PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN DENGAN AHP (ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS) ]]>
<![CDATA[Soebagiyo, Daryono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 2, No 1 (2001) : JEP Juni 2001 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23917/jep.v2i1.3904
<![CDATA[The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a decision and planning which has received a great deal of attention in the past few years from both prettiness of the art/science of planning, and from theoreticians interested in this innovative approach in planning.This paper it is shown that to demonstrated used a simulation analysis measurement involved in the AHPs theory the one of how to derive priority vectors from matrix ofpairwise comparisons has found an especially large interest. Following the concept, AHP server as framework for people to structure their own problem and provide judgements based on knowledge, season on felling, to derive a set of priorities considered as an optimal solution to decision problem.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS UJI KAUSALITAS PENERIMAAN PAJAK DAN PENGELUARAN PEMERINTAH DI KOTA SURAKARTA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE GRANGER TAHUN 1978-2003 ]]>
<![CDATA[Indrawati, Sarastika]]>;
<![CDATA[Soebagiyo, Daryono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 7, No 2 (2006) : JEP Desember 2006 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23917/jep.v7i2.3982
<![CDATA[This research aim is to analyse relation pattern between tax income (Tx) with government expenditure (G) in Surakarta. Referring to that made hypothesis that tax income have causality with government expenditure.This research uses time series data with period of year 1978 - 2003. Analysis result mention that there is causality unidirectional/one way pattern of tax income to government expenditure in Surakarta. It is mean that the increasing of tax income push government expenditure. But, the increasing of government expenditure will not push tax income in Surakarta.]]>
