Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Novelty Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Al-'Adl Jurnal Yudisial ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Sosio-Didaktika: Social Science Education Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
Fahadil Amin Al Hasan
Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
DISPENSASI KAWIN DALAM SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA: Menjamin Kepentingan Terbaik Anak melalui Putusan Hakim Al Hasan, Fahadil Amin; Yusup, Deni Kamaluddin
Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 14 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ahwal.2021.14107

Abstract

This paper examines the process of examining marriage dispensation cases prior to and following the enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Marriage Dispensation Cases. This paper was written using a qualitative research method, specifically normative and empirical juridical approaches. According to the findings of this study, the provisions of Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 have explicitly regulated several things that are not specifically regulated in the formal and material rules governing marriage dispensation. The adoption of this regulation is anticipation and standardization for judges in making legal decisions so that court decisions pay more attention to the best interests of children when granting a marriage dispensation application. Makalah ini mendiskusikan tentang proses pemeriksaan perkara dispensasi kawin sebelum dan sesudah diberlakukannya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Dispensasi Kawin. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan makalah ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, yaitu pendakatan yuridis normatif dan yuridis empiris. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa ketentuan pada Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 telah mengatur secara tegas beberapa hal yang tidak diatur secara khusus di aturan formil maupun materil mengenai dispensasi kawin. Pemberlakuan Perma ini ialah sebagai atisipasi dan standarisasi bagi hakim dalam membuat putusan hukum agar putusan atau penetapan pengadilan lebih merperhatikan kepentingan terbaik anak ketika hendak mengabulkan permohonan dispensasi nikah
Legal protection of women’s and children's rights after divorce through the E-MOSI CAPER App Suadi, Amran; Candra, Mardi; Al Hasan, Fahadil Amin; Gumilar, Gugun
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v15i1.a27347

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: Women and children are frequently mistreated, particularly when they face legal issues. In divorce situations, for example, they often do not receive the entitlements to which they are entitled, such as mut'ah, iddah, and child support. This situation is due to the existing legal system and policies that do not reflect equality and justice for women and children, particularly in the execution of court orders carrying ex-husbands' obligations to their ex-wives. One of the legal advances in this part is using information and technology (IT) to develop a decision execution system. E-MOSI CAPER is one of the IT-based decision execution instruments that ex-wives can employ to demand that their ex-husbands voluntarily carry out the decision's obligations.Purpose/Objective of the Study: This article attempts to describe and analyze how the E-MOSI CAPER App could assure the preservation of women's and children's rights after divorce.Design/Methodology/Approach: This work adopts a qualitative research technique through normative and empirical juridical approaches, with statutory and conceptual approaches.Findings: According to this study, the E-MOSI CAPER application, one of the IT-based services released by the Bengkulu Religious High Court, is an innovation that could be used as a tool in organizing guarantees for the protection of women's and children's rights. This App can increase the compliance of ex-husbands to perform court decisions, which makes this App part of the legal instrument of the Integrated Execution System.Paper Type: Research Article
Child-Centered Adjudication: Integrating the Best Interests Principle Into Indonesian Marital Property Distribution Muchlis, Muchlis; Yasardin, Yasardin; Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo; Khosyi’ah, Siah; Al Hasan, Fahadil Amin
Nurani Vol 25 No 2 (2025): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v25i2.30371

Abstract

The division of marital property often presents a complex legal dilemma. Greater judicial evaluation usually considers acquisition timing, sources, and separation agreements. Nevertheless, the recent Indonesian jurisprudence, especially the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 1/2022 and Cassation Decision No. 377 K/Ag/2023 (5 April 2023), requires the introduction of the principle of the best interests of a child, as stipulated in the Child Protection Act, to the adjudication of marital property. This study adopts a qualitative documentary analysis that draws upon primary legal sources, including statutes, circular letters, and court decisions, and is supplemented by secondary academic literature. The analysis demonstrates how normative rules and jurisprudence integrate the child’s best interest into post-divorce asset allocation. The results indicate that a child’s welfare has become a necessary pillar in judicial reasoning, influencing courts to postpone the distribution of marital assets until children reach adulthood. This normative and jurisprudential shift highlights not only legal enforcement but also substantive justice, ensuring children’s decent living conditions. This research contributes by elucidating the legal significance of Decision 377 K/Ag/2023, which reinforces the role of the best interests principle in Indonesian family law and advances a progressive approach to the adjudication of marital disputes.
PELAKSANAAN PEMERIKSAAN SETEMPAT (DESCENTE) PADA PERKARA HAK ASUH ANAK Sururie, Ramdani Wahyu; Al Hasan, Fahadil Amin
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): HUKUM PROGRESIF
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v15i2.500

Abstract

ABSTRAK Pemeriksaan setempat biasanya dilakukan terhadap perkara sengketa harta benda. Pemeriksaan tersebut bertujuan untuk menghindari kesulitan dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan di kemudian hari. Namun, pemeriksaan setempat ada juga yang dilakukan pada perkara yang pokok sengketanya tidak berhubungan dengan harta benda. Salah satu contohnya adalah perkara sengketa hak asuh anak dalam Putusan Nomor 585/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Ppg. Pada kasus ini, majelis hakim secara ex officio melaksanakan pemeriksaan setempat. Padahal, eksistensi pemeriksaan setempat pada perkara selain sengketa harta benda masih menjadi perdebatan sebagian ahli hukum. Atas dasar tersebut maka timbul beberapa pertanyaan. Pertama, faktor apa saja yang melatarbelakangi majelis hakim melaksanakan pemeriksaan setempat pada kasus ini. Kedua, bagaimana mekanisme pemeriksaan setempat pada perkara ini. Penelitian yang dilakukan untuk artikel ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dan yuridis empirik. Putusan Nomor 585/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Ppg dihubungkan dengan beberapa norma. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa alasan utama dilaksanakannya pemeriksaan setempat karena para pihak tidak dapat menghadirkan anak yang diperebutkan hak asuhnya tersebut ke persidangan. Hal ini menyebabkan majelis hakim belum mendapatkan informasi yang utuh tentang kondisi objektif anak. Selanjutnya, hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa mekanisme pemeriksaan setempat dalam perkara ini tidak berbeda dengan pemeriksaan setempat pada umumnya. Pemeriksaan setempat pada perkara sengketa hak asuh anak ini dilakukan dengan mekanisme yang sama dengan pelaksanaan pemeriksaan setempat pada perkara sengketa harta benda. Adapun perbedaan utama di antara keduanya adalah objek dan tujuan dilaksanakannya pemeriksaan tersebut. Kata kunci: pemeriksaan setempat; sengketa; hak asuh anak; kepentingan terbaik bagi anak. ABSTRACTA site visit is usually conducted on a property dispute case. Such action aims to avoid difficulties in executing a court decision in the future. However, the site visit is also carried out in cases where the subject matters of the disputes are not related to property. One example is the child custody dispute case in Decision Number 585/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Ppg. In this case, the panel of judges did an ex officio site visit. Meanwhile, some legal experts still debate the site visit in cases other than property disputes. Thus, it arises two issues. First, the judges’ consideration to hold the site visit in this case. Second, the site visit mechanism in this case. This research uses normative juridical and empirical juridical methods. Decision Number 585/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Ppg is analyzed to several norms. The research exhibits that the main reason for the site visit is that the parties cannot bring the child whose custody is being contested to court. It made the panel of judges could not obtain complete information about the objective condition of the child. Furthermore, the research reveals that the mechanism for the site visit, in this case, is similar to other general site visits. The site visit in a child custody dispute is done with the same mechanism as the implementation of the site visit in a property dispute. The main difference between the two is the object and purpose of the visit. Keywords: site visit; dispute; child custody; best interest of the child.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK ANAK DALAM SENGKETA HARTA BERSAMA Yusup, Deni Kamaludin; Al Hasan, Fahadil Amin
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 15 No. 3 (2022): BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v15i3.536

Abstract

ABSTRAK Harta bersama adalah harta yang diperoleh sepanjang perkawinan, dimulai sejak awal perkawinan hingga berakhirnya perkawinan. Proses pembagian harta bersama tersebut dilakukan sejak perkawinan berakhir, apakah disebabkan perceraian ataupun kematian salah satu pasangan. Aspek utama yang dipertimbangkan dalam pemeriksaan sengketa harta bersama hanya terkait waktu perolehan harta tanpa aspek lain di luar harta, seperti aspek kepentingan terbaik untuk anak. Hal ini berbeda dengan pemeriksaan harta bersama dalam Putusan Nomor 159 K/Ag/2018 jo. Putusan Nomor 6 PK/Ag/2019 yang juga mempertimbangkan aspek kepentingan anak. Penelitian ini dilakukan secara kualitatif literer menggunakan pendekatan kepustakaan, dengan merujuk kepada dokumen-dokumen atau literatur lain terkait perkara harta bersama dikonjungsikan dengan putusan yang dibahas. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa majelis hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 159 K/Ag/2018 jo. Putusan Nomor 6 PK/Ag/2019 telah melakukan ijtihad progresif dengan melakukan rechtsvinding perihal waktu pembagian harta bersama, dengan mempertimbangkan kepentingan terbaik untuk anak dan menunda proses pembagian harta bersama hingga mereka beranjak dewasa. Maka, gugatan harta bersama yang diajukannya harus dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima. Putusan ini merupakan salah satu putusan yang memberikan jaminan terhadap hak anak untuk mendapatkan perlindungan atas tempat tinggal layak. Putusan ini melahirkan kaidah hukum bahwa apabila gugatan harta bersama berpotensi menghalangi terwujudnya kepentingan terbaik bagi anak maka gugatan tersebut dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima. Kata kunci: harta bersama; gugatan; hak-hak anak; kepentingan terbaik anak.  ABSTRACT Marital property refers to the property that a couple acquires during the course of marriage. The process of dividing the joint assets is carried out after the marriage is terminated, whether due to divorce or one of the spouses’ death. The main aspects considered in the examination of marital property disputes are only related to the time of acquiring the assets, without external aspects such as the best interests of the child. This is in contrast to the examination of joint assets in Decision Number 159 K/Ag/2018 and Decision Number 6 PK/Ag/2019, which takes into account aspects of the child’s interests. This analysis is a qualitative literary research approach, reviewing and exploring documents relevant to the decision in question. This study concluded that the panel of judges in Decision Number 159 K/Ag/2018 jo. Decision Number 6 PK/Ag/2019 has done a progressive ijtihad by carrying out rechtsvinding regarding the timing of sharing joint assets. The judge considers the best interests of the child by delaying the distribution of joint assets until they reach adulthood. Therefore, the marital property lawsuit has to be declared unacceptable. This was one of the decisions that ensured the child’s right to live in safety. This decision put forward the rule of law that if a marital property lawsuit has the potential to hinder the best interests of the child, it is declared unacceptable. Keywords: marital property; lawsuit; children’s rights; best interest of the child.
Co-Authors A. Zamakhsyari Baharuddin Candra, Mardi Gugun Gumilar, Gugun Kamaludin Yusup, Deni Khosyi’ah, Siah Majid, Saiful Maulana, Muhammad Irfan Muchlis Muchlis Muhammad Irfan Maulana Muhammad Nur Alam Muhajir Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo Ramdani Wahyu Sururie Ramdani Wahyu Sururie Saleh, Arief Isdiman Suadi, Amran Yasardin, Yasardin Yusup, Deni Kamaluddin