Untung Sri Hardjanto*), Anni Kurniawati Ratna Herawati
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Published : 48 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : LAW REFORM

Supervision of Bawaslu Pemalang Regency in the 2020 Regional Head Election Ntika Nur Mutiarasari; Ratna Herawati
LAW REFORM Vol 16, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (107.584 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v16i2.33777

Abstract

One of the ongoing democratic activities in 2020 is the Election for the Governor and Deputy Governor, the Regent and Deputy Regent, as well as the Mayor and Deputy Mayor simultaneously in 2020. The success of holding regional elections in Indonesia is largely determined by the performance of the election organizers, one of which is the Election Supervisors a supervisory agency that oversees the process of implementing the Pilkada stages. Pilkada supervision during a pandemic is a big challenge for the ranks of Election Supervisors in Indonesia so it is interesting to study this topic. This research focuses on the supervisory policies issued by the Bawaslu RI during the Covid-19 pandemic and is then linked to the supervision carried out by the Pemalang Regency Bawaslu during the 2020 Pilkada. This legal research used a normative juridical approach and was descriptive analytical in nature which was analysed qualitatively. The results of the study show that there are obstacles and strategies in the supervision of election during the pandemic, but Bawaslu RI and its staff including Bawaslu Pemalang in the supervision of the 2020 Pilkada also carry out with more prevention, socialization to the public through online, maximizing social media owned by the District Bawaslu, coordination between agencies / stakeholders. The Election supervision is also carried out by health protocols in handling Covid-19 in their daily activities in carrying out their duties and authorities.
Juridical Overview on the Inconsistency of Prohibition to be the Member of Political Parties for the Members of Public Institutions Fajar Prima Julian; Ratna Herawati
LAW REFORM Vol 17, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (106.925 KB) | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v17i2.41747

Abstract

The creation of a justice in the life of the nation and state must be supported by regulations that do not conflict with other regulations. The prohibition to join a political party for administrators of public institutions   is in conflict with higher regulations. The article is considered contrary to the principle of "Equality before the Law" when viewed from the aspect of equal concern put forward by Ronald Dworkin. The purpose of this research was to analyze the inconsistency of the prohibition article for members of public institutions   to join political parties and to explain the legal implications for the public institutions when they do not comply with these regulations. The method used was normative juridical with descriptive analytical research specifications, and the type of the data were secondary data. The data analysis was conducted qualitatively. Political rights are part of the human rights owned by a person who should not be limited by discriminatory treatments. In fact, there are still restrictions on these political rights which are detrimental to a person from contributing to become the administrator of a public institution. The contents of conflicting articles cause the public institutions to have a crisis of law compliance, is actually a hierarchical harmony between laws and regulations in Indonesia.