Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Jurnal YIN YANG Al-Mawarid Jurnal Hukum Islam Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam El-Mashlahah SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR) Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (IJIIS) Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law (IJIL) Studia Islamika
Muhammad Iqbal Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Astronomy Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
رأي أبي حنيفة في وجود والي الزواج Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
Al-Mawarid Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 15, No 1 (2015): Islamic Family Law Reform in Contemporary Indonesia
Publisher : Islamic University of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper discusses about the position of guardian in marriage. A marriage certainly has the goal to establish a harmonious family which in the language of religion called by sakinah, mawadah and rahmah. In order to realize the noble purpose of marriage, the majority of scholars consider it important for the guardianship in a marriage as one of the form to preserve the rights of women who are under guardianship. Although most of scholars argued that the guardian as pillars of marriage as adopted in Indonesia by existing any legislation, however there is one who different from the other scholars, he is Imam Abu Hanifah. According to him, the guardian is not included pillars of a marriage. The arguments is used by Abu Hanifa is analogy (qiyas) that mature girl is actually same as the widow. A woman who has grown up in this case as one who would marry is a person of the most understanding of himself. Imam Abu Hanifa’s frameworks more reasonable caused by the social conditions surrounding that metropolitan. Thus, the socio-civic of someone will affect the thinking constructs. Keywords : Guardian, Imam Abu Hanifah, Social-Civic.
Otoritarianisme Pemahaman Keagamaan: Melacak Akar Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan dalam Rumah Tangga Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam Gender dan Anak Vol 16 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Studi Gender dan Anak (PSGA) IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/yinyang.v16i1.3999

Abstract

The phenomenon of violence against women in Indonesia is always increasing and leaves a devastating impact on various fronts. Every woman with various backgrounds has the same vulnerability to become a victim. The causes of violence against women are as diverse as patriarchal culture, labeling of women with weak physical conditions, to gender-biased interpretation of religious texts. The practice of religious interpretation which tends to position the text as a rigid and final entity is certainly not relevant to the spirit of Islam in realizing general prosperity, especially between men and wives. The text is also seen as justification for personal interests and even groups. This imbalance then gives birth to what is called authoritarianism. The practice of religious authoritarianism eventually raises the problem of injustice and even violence that often makes women or wives victims. In religious discourse, historically the root of violence in originated from the paradigm of human creation. Women are considered as complementary or subordinate creatures of men. This understanding is based on religious texts such as QS An-Nisa [4]: ​​34 which is commonly understood as a form of giving the mandate of male authority over women. Therefore, insight into authoritative interpretation is needed. Religious texts are not final entities, but always intersect with social and cultural realities.Equality, authority, Religious authoritarianism
Sharia, Gender, and Science in the Construction of ‘Iddah: The Response of Banyumas' Ulamas Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal; Fadhilah, Eva; Syufaat, Syufaat; Zahro, Anisatuz
El-Mashlahah Vol 14 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/el-mashlahah.v14i1.7917

Abstract

The development of science necessitates changes in various issues of human life, including matters of family law. One of the family law issues that often sparks debate is the issue of 'iddah. One of the reasons (reason) often found in the discussions of scholars is to ensure the cleanliness of the uterus from the fetus. If this argument is used as the main basis, it is refuted by the development of medical technology, which can ensure the cleanliness of the uterus in a relatively short time. Likewise, from a gender perspective, because the owner of the womb is only a woman, it cannot be exchanged. This study aims to analyze the extent to which Banyumas’ Ulama views respond to the development of science and gender discourse in the context of family law. This research is empirical legal research, analyzing the responses of Banyumas scholars. Researchers collected data from scholars who came from different religious organization backgrounds, namely Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, and al-Irsyad. These three are the organizations with the most followers in Banyumas. Banyumas became the locus of this research because there is a view that egalitarian principles are living values in society, as described in the chronicle historical texts (babad). The study concluded that the responses of the Banyumas Ulama were divided into two groups, namely textualists and semi-textualists. However, the semi-textualist group is more dominant among them. This research at the same time proves that the relationship between religion and science has not yet reached an integrative or even transdisciplinary level but is still at a dialogic level, and there is even a dualistic view.
The Phenomena of Hijrah and the Rise of Middle-Class Muslims in Banyumas: Agency, Articulation, and Domination Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR) 2024: Volume 5 Issue 2
Publisher : Indonesian Academy of Social and Religious Research (IASRR)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53639/ijssr.v5i2.263

Abstract

This study examines the religious phenomenon practised by middle-class Muslim communities in Banyumas. Middle-class Muslim society plays an essential role in social changes. Educational and economic levels and broader social networks identify these community groups. The critical question is how this community group is in its religious context. This research is a field research with a sociological approach. The researcher uses Anthony Giddens' theory to see the dynamics of religion comprehensively. The primary data comes from understanding and practising the diversity of the Muslim community itself, as well as observing three urban mosques: the MBJS Mosque, the FZ Mosque, and the MGI. The secondary data comes from bulletins, journals, books, media, etc. The research concludes that middle-class Muslims make efforts to contextualize the fundamental conception of hijrah with the reality of modern urban Muslim society. However, it is still general and symbolic. The articulation of understanding is manifested in the life of religious issues and issues such as staying away from usury, music, and so on. Understanding that tends to be textual is inseparable from the structure and agents surrounding it.
GOOD GOVERNANCE PERSPEKTIF MAQAASID ASY-SYAARI’AH KONTEMPORER Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
AKADEMIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 23 No 1 (2018): Good Coorporate Governance dan Manajemen Lembaga Pendidikan Islam
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/akademika.v23i1.1195

Abstract

AbstractGood governance is a concept for governance that should be run. Theoretically, the discourse of good governance reaps its pros and cons since it had been firstly introduced. However, as a concept and a strategic offer it deserves to be appreciated and re-examined. There are principles in good governance that are compatible with Islam such as accountability, transparency, deliberation, and others. Good governance will be achieved when it involves a good communication among the government, civil society, and the business sector. The author uses the perspective of contemporary maqaasid asy-shari'ah to view the discourse with more emphasis on development and right. The perspective is different from the old maqasid which emphasizes more on the protection and preservation. The result of the study shows that good governace needs harmonious relationship among the followers of religion, social justice, organized and equitable education, human rights protection, and the development of civilized law.Keywords : Good Governance, Maqâsid asy-Syaari’ah, DevelopmentAbstrakGood governance merupakan sebuah konsep tata kelola pemerintahan yang seharusnya dijalankan. Secara teoritis, diskursus good governace menuai pro-kontra sejak awal kemunculannya. Meskipun demikian, sebagai sebuah konsep dan tawaran strategis patut untuk diapresiasi dan dikaji kembali. Terdapat prinsip-prinsip dalam good governance yang berkesesuaian dengan Islam diantaranya akuntabilitas, transparansi, musyawarah, dan lainnya. Upaya mewujudkannya tidak hanya dilakukan oleh satu pihak saja, tetapi komunikasi antara pemerintah (goverment), masyarakat sipil, dan sektor dunia usaha. Dalam melihat diskursus ini, penulis menggunakan perspektif maqaasid asy-Syaari’ah kontemporer dengan lebih menekankan pada development (pembangunan; pengembangan) dan right (hak-hak). Berbeda dengan maqasid lama lebih pada protection (perlindungan) dan preservation (penjagaan; pelestarian). Berdasarkan hasil kajian tersebut bahwa dalam mewujudkan good governace diperlukan pembangunan dalam berbagai aspek seperti membangun hubungan harmonis antar pemeluk agama, mewujudkan keadilan sosial, penyelenggaran dan pemerataan pendidikan, perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia, pembangunan hukum berkeadaban.. Kata kunci: Good Governance, Maqaasid asy-Syaari’ah, dan Pembangunan
REKONSTRUKSI NALAR ARAB KONTEMPORER MUHAMMAD ‘ABED AL-JABIRI Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law
Publisher : Postgraduate Programme of UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/ijil.v1i2.365

Abstract

Kondisi nalar Arab mengalami stagnasi yang cukup akut. Akibatnya, dunia Arab mengalami ketertinggalan dibanding dengan nalar modern yang semakin berkembang. Problem mendasar tersebut menjadi tantangan tersendiri bagi M. Abed al-Jabiri untuk membangkitkan nalar Arab dari tidur panjang. Jabiri berpendapat bahwa dunia Arab dan Islam tidak harus menutup mata dari perkembangan dunia Barat, justru harus terjadi dialog kirits dan dialog peradaban. Apa yang dilakukan Jabiri dalam pencariannya tentang otentisitas merupakan usaha besarnya untuk memajukan dunia Arab Islam dan menghindari proses klaim kebuyaan lain, baik berasal dari tradisi Islam masa lampau maupun modernitas Barat. Jabiri sangat menekankan epistemologi pemikiran Arab kontemporer sebagai jalan untuk menghadapi modernitas. Dalam upaya merekostruksi nalar Arab kontemporer, Jabiri membagi tiga nalar epistemologi yaitu bayani, burhani dan irfani. Pembagian tersebut tidak lepas dari banyak kritik. Misalnya, dengan adanya pembagian tersebut, Jabiri telah membuat pragmentasi pada diri seorang.
The Contestation of the Family Law Discourse in the Digital Age: Islam, State, and Gender Ansori, Ansori; Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Vol 6, No 1 (2022): Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/sjhk.v6i1.9128

Abstract

This study examines the contestation of gender discourse in family law on social media and its relationship to religion and state law. This study seeks to answer three questions: how gender relations in the family are constructed on social media, how the struggle for the meaning of gender equality in family law occurs on social media, and why some digital activists in Indonesia have a dualistic understanding of religious law and state law in the context of family law. This is a qualitative study employing approaches from discourse analysis. Utilizing Bourdieu's theory, the researcher examines the contestation of gender relations discourse on social media. There are two groups with opposing viewpoints: those who oppose equality and those who support it. This study demonstrates that each gender narrative agent develops the discourse about the relationships between men and women using a variety of media, including YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, and an official website. Each has a large number of social media followers. There are numerous ways to disseminate discourse, including lectures, short videos, quotations, images, and scholarly articles. In the context of its relationship to state law, the first group tends to place the state in an overbearing role. This is understood due to the attitude of the state, which governs a number of matters not covered by the Shari'a. In contrast, the second group views religion and state law as mutually beneficial and therefore inseparable. There are a number of conclusions based on a variety of evidence, one of which is that religious authority in the media is fractured based on religious group affiliation, particularly in the family law debate. The problem of authority in the media is no longer defined by a character's scientific aptitude but by who has the most control over the media and the largest number of followers. In addition, sources of religious discourse, particularly family law, have shifted to a variety of media. In order to determine an authority's perspective in the media, it is vital to consider the fundamental values of Islam and perspectives that do not conflict with religion and the state.
REKONSTRUKSI NALAR HUKUM ISLAM KONTEMPORER MUHAMMAD SHAHRUR DAN KONTEKSTUALISASINYA Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/mawarid.vol4.iss1.art4

Abstract

Artikel ini mendiskusikan pemikiran tokoh Muslim kontemporer yang menuai pro-kontra terhadap konstruksi metodologi hukum Islam yaitu Muhammad Shahrur. Ia digolongkan oleh sarjana Muslim ke dalam kelompok pembaharu dengan spirit liberalism keagamaan yang cenderung mendobrak tradisi keilmuan klasik. Menurutnya, pemikiran Islam secara umum memiliki beberapa problem akademik yang serius, baik secara metodologis, historis maupun substansi. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, Shahrur membangun sejumlah prinsip penafsiran dan konstruksi fiqh baru. Di antara prinsip tersebut, Shahrur menawarkan nalar berfikir dalam memahami kedudukan Al-Qur’an. Salah satu kontribusi penting Shahrur dalam konteks pembacaan teks keagamaan adalah konsep batas (theory of limits). Menurutnya, Al-Qur’an selalu menyebutkan bahwa syariat hanya menentukan batas-batas tertentu, karena sifat dari Al-Qur’an adalah universal bagi setiap generasi. Oleh karena itu, proses ijtihad menjadi sikap gerak dalam menafsirkan Al-Qur’an sesuai dengan realitas kondisi zaman. Dalam artikel ini juga dibahas mengenai aplikasi dan kontekstualisasi teori Shahrur terhadap persoalan hukum Islam yaitu poligami, jilbab, dan milk al-yamin. Dalam merespons persoalan tersebut, Shahrur menekankan pembacaan yang komprehensif dengan mengupas relasi antar ayat baik secara kebahasaan dan analisis mendalam dengan terhadap struktur ayat, maupun membaca realitas kontemporer serta menekankan pola “pembacaan kedua” untuk mendapatkan pemahaman yang lebih segar dan kontekstual. This article discusses the thoughts of contemporary Muslim figures who reap the pros and cons of the construction of Islamic law methodology, namely Muhammad Shahrur. He is classified by Muslim scholars into a group of reformers with the spirit of religious liberalism which tends to break the classical scientific tradition. According to him, Islamic thought, in general, has several serious academic problems, both methodologically, historically, and substantively. Based on this, Shahrur developed a number of principles of interpretation and construction of new fiqh. Among these principles, Shahrur constructs reason in understanding the position of the Qur'an. One of Shahrur's important contributions in the context of reading religious texts is the concept of limits (theory of limits). According to him, the Qur'an always mentions that the Shari'a only determines certain limits, because the nature of the Qur'an is universal for every generation. Therefore, the process of ijtihad becomes an attitude of movement in interpreting the Qur'an in accordance with the reality of the conditions of the times. This article also discusses the application and contextualization of Shahrur's theory to issues of Islamic law, namely polygamy, hijab, and milk al-yamin. In responding to this problem, Shahrur emphasized a comprehensive reading by exploring the relationship between verses both linguistically and in-depth analysis with the structure of the verse, as well as reading the contemporary reality.
KHALED M. ABOU El-FADL’S AUTHORITATIVE HERMENEUTICS: AGAINST AUTHORITARIANISM IN ISLAMIC LAW Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal
Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (IJIIS) Vol. 2, No. 2, March 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/ijiis.vol2.iss2.art1

Abstract

Authoritarianism stems from an imbalance between text, author, and reader. The relationship between those three elements must occur dialectically-dynamically. Khaled M. Abou El Fadl scrutinized religious fatwas of fatwa institutions in Saudi Arabia that tend to discriminate against women to prove the existence of authoritarianism in Islamic legal thought. Abou El Fadl stressed the importance of referring to authoritative sources as an embodiment of authoritative law. For him, the Qur’an is the main authoritative source that is no doubt. In contrast, the traditions (Hadith) need further proof, considering the codification of the hadith took place two centuries after the death of the Prophet. Abou El Fadl built his concept of authority based on Friedman’s thinking which distinguishes coercive authority from persuasive authority. He also distinguished between holding authority and assuming authority. The difference between the two will lead to different legal consequences. Based on this, Abou El Fadl offered authoritative hermeneutics as a methodological framework.
Eco-Fatwas and the Challenges for Local ‘Ulamā’ in Addressing Environmental Issues in Indonesia: Evidence from the Riau Province Ansori, Ansori; Juliansyahzen, Muhammad Iqbal; Prihantoro, Hijrian Angga
Studia Islamika Vol. 32 No. 2 (2025): Studia Islamika
Publisher : Center for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36712/sdi.v32i2.38706

Abstract

Despite its abundant natural resources, Riau Province confronts significant challenges, notably forest fires attributed to agricultural practices and land conversion for palm oil cultivation. This article seeks to examine the difficulties encountered by local ‘ulamā’ in addressing environmental issues within Riau Province. The study employs a socio-legal framework to elucidate the responses of local ‘ulamā’ to these challenges, particularly through the application of religious teachings, referred to as eco-fatwas, to comprehend and address the environmental problems prevalent within the region. Utilizing a methodological approach that incorporates in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis, the study concludes that the eco-fatwas disseminated by local ‘ulamā’ confront complex challenges, including economic competition, political interests, sectoral egos, and power hegemony. Consequently, this research emphasizes the necessity for the concurrent implementation of cross-community and cross-policy da’wah strategies to effectively mitigate environmental degradation in Riau Province.
Co-Authors ansori ansori Euis Nurlaelawati Fadhilah, Eva Noor Hamid, Noor Ocktoberrinsyah Ocktoberrinsyah, Ocktoberrinsyah Prihantoro, Hijrian Angga Solly Aryza Syufaat, Syufaat Zahro, Anisatuz