Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.048
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Pariwisata Pesona Jurnal Natapraja : Kajian Ilmu Administrasi Negara Jurnal Ad'ministrare: Jurnal Pemikiran Ilmiah dan Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran Jurnal Administrasi Publik : Public Administration Journal Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Kemudi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan Alignment: Journal of Administration and Educational Management Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Bhakti Praja JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations) J-3P (Jurnal Pembangunan Pemberdayaan Pemerintahan) Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian GOVERNABILITAS (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Semesta) Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal of Governance and Accountability Studies Khazanah Sosial Lentera Negeri
Teguh Kurniawan
Departemen Ilmu Administrasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Three years of the corruption eradication commission’s institutional reform: A narrative policy analysis Darmawan Pranoto; Teguh Kurniawan
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 8 No 2 (2022): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v8i2.943

Abstract

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) has been in a dramatic institutional transition since the enactment of the Second Amendment of the CEC Law in 2019, followed by a series of subsequent policies. The policy narrative presented by the government and the DPR as the policy-making actors is that the policy was carried out to strengthen the performance of the KPK. Meanwhile, counter-narratives emerged that said the opposite. This discourse took place intensively from 2019 to 2022, judging by the number of media reports. As a result of the narrative debate, based on several surveys, the KPK experienced a significant decline in the level of trust from the public. Using the Narrative Policy Analysis, this study poses the question: how does the government construct the KPK's institutional reform policy narrative? This research finds that the government policy narrative is built on distant belief systems but is not accompanied by adequate positive incentives, resulting in a prolonged polemic. In this study, it is suggested that the government conducts a comprehensive evaluation study of this policy, opens a space for open dialogue by involving counter-narrative actors, and conducts better policy advocacy.
Co-Authors Andy Pasaribu Ardila Muslim Athirah Mazaya Aulia Setyabudi Darmawan Pranoto Denny Gunawan Desi Wahyuningtias Dinda Shafira Dwi Arlan Dwi Indriastuti Felix Aglen Ndaru Hari Haryanto Ikke Febriandhika Irfan Ridwan Maksum Irvan Sebastian Iskandar Kusumajati Kusumajati Richard Angelo Nathaniel Taulu Risky Kurniawan Rosma Rosmala Dewi Roy Valiant Salomo Syaifudin Zakir Teguh Saeful Hamzah Yelli Diani Zaenal Fanani