Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KETAHANAN BEBERAPA GALUR DAN VARIETAS PADI (Oryza Sativa L.) TERHADAP SERANGAN VIRUS TUNGRO Samsul Huda Asrori; Tutung Hadiastono; Mintarto Martosudiro
Jurnal HPT (Hama Penyakit Tumbuhan) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui ketahanan dari masing-masing 5 galur  (P90, P39, P61, D dan 25A) dan 7 varietas padi (Sembada, Long Ping, Ciherang, Devgen, Hipa8, Inpari13 dan IR64) terhadap serangan virus tungro. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Rumah kaca Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Brawijaya - Malang. Perlakuan percobaan merupakan lima galur padi (P90, P39, P61, D dan 25A) dan tujuh varietas padi (Sembada, Long Ping, Ciherang, Devgen, Hipa8, Inpari13 dan IR64), percobaan diulang tiga kali yang masing-masing diinfeksi virus tungro dengan menggunakan vektor wereng hijau yang sudah membawa virus tungro. Variabel pengamatan meliputi intensitas kerusakan, masa inkubasi, tinggi tanaman dan jumlah daun. Data hasil pengamatan dievaluasi untuk menentukan kriteria ketahanan dengan metode Castillo dkk, 1978 (dalam Heroetadji, 1983). Hasil perhitungan katagori ketahanan menunjukkan bahwa dari lima galur dan tujuh varietas padi terdapat satu varietas yang mempunyai kriteria ketahanan katagori Tahan (R) yaitu varietas Inpari13 dengan intensitas serangan terendah 20,74%, masa inkubasi paling lama 16 hari setelah inokulasi, tinggi tanaman 46,67cm dan jumlah daun 8,67 helai, satu galur yang menunjukkan katagori ketahanan Peka (S) yaitu galur P90 dengan intensitas kerusakan tertinggi 41,73%.   Kata kunci: Tungro, Padi, Uji Ketahanan.
Reconstruction Of “Obstruction Of Justice” As A Criminal Act In The Law On Eradicating Corruption In Indonesia Samsul HUDA; Bambang SUGIRI; Nurini APRILIANDA; Heru R. HADI
International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science (Nov
Publisher : Indonesia Strategic Sustainability

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/ijesss.v3i3.260

Abstract

Corruption is a special criminal act, qualified as an ordinary crime but must be eradicated in extraordinary ways. In Indonesia, it is not only an extraordinary method but also an institution with extraordinary authority formed because corruption has become a systemic and systematic disease of society. Criminalizing the act of "obstructing the judicial process" is one way to eradicate corruption extraordinarily. The positive law has already regulated it, but it needs to be strengthened by ratifying UNCAC 2003 so that the norms governing the offense can be universally recognized. This study aims to synchronize and harmonize the norms that have been regulated in positive law with the new norms regulated in UNCAC 2003 to avoid misperceptions in its implementation. The normative method is used by examining philosophically and juridically through principles and theories that develop and are associated with emerging empirical problems. Several legal cases are used to analyze the philosophical and juridical problems and to find weaknesses in the "obstruction of justice" offense norm. It needs to be reconstructed to ensure legal certainty and justice better. In the end, the goal of eradicating corruption can be achieved, without violating the proper criminal procedural law and placing interested parties, both from the perspective of the perpetrators and victims.
Criminalization of Gratification as a Corruption Offense Samsul Huda; Bambang Sugiri; Nurini Aprilianda; Heru Ratno Hadi
Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani Vol. 2 No. 12 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/mudima.v2i12.2052

Abstract

Gratification or gifts are criminal acts of corruption, if given to state officials or civil servants. The form of corruption is bribery. This corruption crime was only formulated in Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption (hereinafter referred to as the Corruption Law). The birth of the regulation regarding gratification as one of the criminal acts of corruption in the Anti-Corruption Law is a form of state anticipation in dealing with various new modus operandi in acts of corruption. In order to provide a sense of justice, usefulness and legal certainty in its implementation, gratification offenses should be prepared on a philosophical, sociological and juridical basis. The study aims to find out bribe and gratification acts. This study uses normative research methods. Moreover, as part of the element of offense in the criminal act of corruption with the offense itself being the recipient of gratification, the proof in gratification adheres to the principle of the reverse burden of proof. Therefore, in the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, Gratification recipients are required to submit a report to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) within 30 (thirty) days. the gratification report is received by the KPK, within 30 (thirty) days the KPK will determine whether the gratification is a bribe or not. If it is proven that a bribe is proven, the gratuity will become the property of the state and vice versa if it is not related, then the gratification becomes the right of the recipient of the gratification