Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Pemberantasan Dan Pencegahan Oligopoli dan Persekongkolan Oleh KPPU (Studi Kasus PT.Telekomumikasi Indonesia) Hartini, Rahayu; Azzahra, Fatimah
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2024
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jh.v5i1.3970

Abstract

The Indonesian Telecommunications Industry Development The Republic of Indonesian government launched the program has a noble goal of ensuring that telecommunications infrastructure reaches all parts of Indonesia. To achieve this goal, several telecommunications companies joined the Parapa Ring consortium and organized the Parapa Ring project which aims to expand telecommunications networks throughout Indonesia. In handling bid manipulation cases, the Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha Perusahaan (KPPU) applies two main principles, namely the principle of per se illegality and the principle of reasonableness. However, the application of these principles is often challenged and flawed, as evidenced by Decision No. 36/KPPU-L/2010 on alleged discriminatory practices and collusion in the tender for the procurement of the Palapa Ring Mataram-Kupang cable system project. The doctrine of unlawfulness states that a particular agreement or business activity is unlawful if there is no further evidence of its effects. On the other hand, the rule of reason requires further evidence to determine whether an action inhibits or promotes competition. In a tender conspiracy, KPPU applies the rule of reason because it needs to be proven in more depth the effect of the act on business competition. Decision Number 36/KPPU-L/2010 highlights the misapplication of the principle of reason.
The International Arbitration Award as a Simple Proof Requirement in Bankruptcy Hartini, Rahayu; Ali, Hasani Moh.; Multazam, Mochammad Tanzil; Faizin, Moh.; Putra, Ahmad Dzulfiqar Hibatullah
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14056

Abstract

Bankruptcy and Arbitration are forms of mechanisms for resolving disputes among parties. The purpose of this research is to explore the use of international arbitration awards as a simple proof requirement in bankruptcy cases. The research methods employed include the statute approach and conceptual approach. The findings of this research indicate that international arbitration awards can be admissible as simple proof due to the final and binding nature of international arbitration awards when they meet certain requirements established by Indonesian positive law. Specifically, if an international arbitration award has been registered and requested for enforcement at the Central Jakarta District Court, the international arbitration award is considered valid. Meeting these criteria, international arbitration awards, as authentic evidence, fulfill the simple proof requirement. However, if an international arbitration award does not meet these requirements, it cannot be considered authentic evidence in bankruptcy proceedings under Indonesian positive law, as the authenticity of international arbitration awards is only recognized when they have been registered and requested for enforcement.
Perlindungan Perlindungan Hukum Mengenai Hak Istri dan Anak Hasil Perkawinan Siri Deva, Ahmad Dimas Putra; Hartini, Rahayu
Satya Dharma : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Satya Dharma: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : IAHN Tampung Penyang Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33363/sd.v8i2.1566

Abstract

Perkawinan siri dilakukan tanpa adanya pencatatan dari pihak KUA, namun rukun perkawinan terpenuhi sesuai agama seperti adanya wali, saksi, ijab, kabul dan mahar. Penelitian ini bertujuan memahami faktor-faktor terjadinya perkawinan siri, legalitas perkawinan siri, dampak istri dan anak hasl perkawinan siri serta solusi agar semua masalah tersebut dapat dihadapi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam artikel ini yuridis normatif yang mengkaji beberapa aturan yang berlaku / hukum positif. Penelitian ini juga mengkaji faktor sosial-budaya yang terjadi di lingkungan masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perkawinan siri masih banyak terjadi di Indonesia dengan didasari beberapa faktor-faktor seoerti ekonomi, keinginan poligami yang tidak dapat restu dari istri, hamil diluar nikah dan penelitian ini juga menghasilkan bahwa dari perkawinan siri ini menyebabkan / menimbulkan tidak adanya kekuatan hukum untuk menjamin hak istri dan anak serta tidak diakuinya perkawinan siri secara oleh negara. Demikian, diperlukan upaya agar perkawinan siri dapat dicatatkan secara resmi agar hak-hak yang seharusnya didapatkan mendapatkan kepastian hukum, serta perkawinan tersebut memiliki kekuatan hukum.