Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.063
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Bestari Yustisia SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Arena Hukum Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Journal of Community Service and Empowerment Community Empowerment Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Jurnal Hukum Pelita Satya Dharma: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Scientia Law Review AJCD
Rahayu Hartini
Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang, Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The International Arbitration Award as a Simple Proof Requirement in Bankruptcy Hartini, Rahayu; Ali, Hasani Moh.; Multazam, Mochammad Tanzil; Faizin, Moh.; Putra, Ahmad Dzulfiqar Hibatullah
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14056

Abstract

Bankruptcy and Arbitration are forms of mechanisms for resolving disputes among parties. The purpose of this research is to explore the use of international arbitration awards as a simple proof requirement in bankruptcy cases. The research methods employed include the statute approach and conceptual approach. The findings of this research indicate that international arbitration awards can be admissible as simple proof due to the final and binding nature of international arbitration awards when they meet certain requirements established by Indonesian positive law. Specifically, if an international arbitration award has been registered and requested for enforcement at the Central Jakarta District Court, the international arbitration award is considered valid. Meeting these criteria, international arbitration awards, as authentic evidence, fulfill the simple proof requirement. However, if an international arbitration award does not meet these requirements, it cannot be considered authentic evidence in bankruptcy proceedings under Indonesian positive law, as the authenticity of international arbitration awards is only recognized when they have been registered and requested for enforcement.
Perlindungan Perlindungan Hukum Mengenai Hak Istri dan Anak Hasil Perkawinan Siri Deva, Ahmad Dimas Putra; Hartini, Rahayu
Satya Dharma : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Satya Dharma: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : IAHN Tampung Penyang Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33363/sd.v8i2.1566

Abstract

Perkawinan siri dilakukan tanpa adanya pencatatan dari pihak KUA, namun rukun perkawinan terpenuhi sesuai agama seperti adanya wali, saksi, ijab, kabul dan mahar. Penelitian ini bertujuan memahami faktor-faktor terjadinya perkawinan siri, legalitas perkawinan siri, dampak istri dan anak hasl perkawinan siri serta solusi agar semua masalah tersebut dapat dihadapi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam artikel ini yuridis normatif yang mengkaji beberapa aturan yang berlaku / hukum positif. Penelitian ini juga mengkaji faktor sosial-budaya yang terjadi di lingkungan masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perkawinan siri masih banyak terjadi di Indonesia dengan didasari beberapa faktor-faktor seoerti ekonomi, keinginan poligami yang tidak dapat restu dari istri, hamil diluar nikah dan penelitian ini juga menghasilkan bahwa dari perkawinan siri ini menyebabkan / menimbulkan tidak adanya kekuatan hukum untuk menjamin hak istri dan anak serta tidak diakuinya perkawinan siri secara oleh negara. Demikian, diperlukan upaya agar perkawinan siri dapat dicatatkan secara resmi agar hak-hak yang seharusnya didapatkan mendapatkan kepastian hukum, serta perkawinan tersebut memiliki kekuatan hukum.
UNDANG-UNDANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG NO 37 TH 2004 MENGESAMPINGKAN BERLAKUNYA ASAS PACTA SUNT SERVANDA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPAILITAN Hartini, Rahayu
Yustisia Vol 4, No 2: August 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8648

Abstract

AbstractThis study was to formulate a concept of return policies / principles of the law of "pacta sunt servanda" in Law No. 37 Year 2004 regarding Bankruptcy in bankruptcy to resolve disputes arbitration clause. By promoting legal issue: Why the provisions of Article 303 of Law No. 37 Year 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU basic rule "pacta sunt servanda" in a bankruptcy dispute resolution by arbitration clause. Research is normative juridical approach the statutory (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Basingon: doctrine, theory and principles of law and reasoning/logic of the law as a legal argument. From the discussion of the research results obtained conclusions; that Article 303 of Law No. 37 In 2004 the basic rule pacta sunt servanda occurrence in bankruptcy solutions that are its arbitration clause. The principle is metanorma should be legal guidelines for each product that has never been out of the occurrence of any legal basis. (1).Pasal 303,UUK afflicted materil law, when it is left actually dangerous because it can cause legal uncertainty which may result in less used existing legal rules(Article 303 UUK, an article that "kebablasan wrong/confused".(2).Position agreement with the law is the same, meaning that the agreement in this case in particular the provisions of the Arbitration clause made by the party should be the same as in the case of the Law on Bankruptcy. AbstrakPenelitian ini untuk merumuskan kembali suatu konsep dasar/prinsip hukum “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa pailit dengan klausula arbitrase. Dengan mengedepankan legal issue;Mengapa ketentuan Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU mengesampingkan asas “Pacta Sunt Servanda” dalam penyelesaian sengketa pailit dengan klausul arbitrase. Merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangan-undangan (statute approach), histrorical approach, conceptual approach dan case approach. Mendasarkan pada: doktrin, teori dan prinsip hukum dengan penalaran/logika hukum sebagai argumentasi hukum. Dari pembahasan hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan;bahwa Pasal 303 UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 mengesampingkan berlakunya asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam penyelesaian masalah kepailitanyang ada klausul arbitrase-nya. Azas merupakan metanorma yang harus dijadikan pedoman bagi setiap produk hukum agar tidak pernah keluar dari berlakunya asas hukum. (1).Pasal 303 UUK mengalami cacat hokummateril, apabila hal ini dibiarkan justru berbahaya karena dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum yang dapat berdampak pada kurang bermanfaatnya aturan hukum yang ada (Pasal 303 UUK, merupakan Pasal yang “kebablasan/salah/keliru”.(2).Posisi perjanjian dengan undang-undang adalah sama/sederajad, artinya perjanjian dalam hal ini khususnya ketentuan mengenai Klausul Arbitrase yang dibuat oleh para pihak seharusnya sama berlakunyaseperti halnya UU Kepailitan.
LEGAL STATUS OF BANK GUARANTEE ON BEHALF OF THIRD PARTIES IN BANKRUPTCY PERSPECTIVE Hartini, Rahayu
Yustisia Vol 6, No 1: April 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v6i1.11530

Abstract

 This study aimed to observe the legal status of the immovable that became a bank guarantee on behalf of third parties in the bankruptcy and whether the curator has the authority to insert objects that have been done Collateral guarantees which Foreclosed (hereinafter referred AYDA) prior to the bankruptcy decision boedel into bankruptcy.The method used is a normative research using three approaches: statute approach, conceptual approach, case approach, and analyzed "conten analysis". Based on the discussion of the results of research obtained the following conclusions: 1). The collateral property of a third party cannot be entered as boedel bankrupt debtor, as a third party guarantee is not a property of the Borrower; It is used as the basis of legal considerations (ratio decidendi) for the judges to decide the case of bankruptcy among Curator Albert Riyadi Suwono (applicant bankruptcy) with PT. Anglomas International Bank (AMIN BANK). 2). Curators do not have the authority to push objects of collateral that has been done AYDA prior to the bankruptcy decision into boedel bankrupt (pursuant to Article 56 Paragraph (1) the Bankruptcy Law that provides a period of suspension of execution rights guarantees security rights 90 (Ninety) days. In order not occur: legal norms are vague (vegen norm) and the conflict of norms and have an impact on the lack of legal certainty. Hence the need to revise the unprotected substrate of law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and PKPU. Particularly with respect to Article 55 paragraph (1) and Article 56 paragraph (1). 
Co-Authors Ageng Supadi, Rani Tri Ahmad Dzulfiqar Hibatullah Putra Ali, Hasani Moh. Amir Syarifuddin Arief, Muhammad Briliawan Gama Rahmatullah Deva, Ahmad Dimas Putra Fadilla Muhammad Mahdi Faizin, Moh. Fatimah Azzahra Jamik Imam Utomo Kurniawan, Wahyudi Mochammad Tanzil Multazam Moh.Ali, Hasani Mohammad Faisal Jamaludin Malik Mohammad Hanif Furqan Aufa Putra Muhammad Luthfi Mulyawati, Delia Patma, Tundung Subali Permana, Adi Pramesti, Yashinta Chindy Putra, Ahmad Dzulfiqar Hibatullah Rahma, Tannasya Putri Saputra, Septiadi Satrio Noto Negoro, Muhammad Setiya Nugroho Tinuk Dwi Cahyani Wahyu Prihanta Windi Argiatmoko Yunita, Aryani Zahra, Ashila Zainuri, Ach. Muhib