Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.037
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) Istinarah: Riset Keagamaan, Sosial dan Budaya Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam El-Rusyd
Bustamar Bustamar, Bustamar
IAIN Bukittinggi
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
SMALL CLAIM COURT DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PERDATA DI INDONESIA DAN PELUANG PENERAPANNYA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONONOMI SYARI’AH PADA PERADILAN AGAMA Bustamar, Bustamar
Alhurriyah Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Januari - Juni 2016
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v1i1.483

Abstract

The enactment of Small claims court mechanism that marked with the enactment of PERMA Number. 2 Year 2015 concerning Procedure for Simple Quarrel Settlement is a new breakthrough in the civil justice system in Indonesia. This breakthrough was reached by the Supreme Court in order to reduce the queues for settling of civil Quarrel in court that the value is under $ 200 million. Implementation of Quarrel resolution by Small claim court mechanisms is done by a single judge assisted by a Registrar and can be completed within 25 working days and the decision is final and binding so that it is unable filed an appeal or judicial review to the Supreme Court, the decision of which can be directly execute in accordance with the civil judicial mechanisms in general. Small claims court jurisdiction which is set in PERMA No. 2 2015 is the General Courts, considering the Religious Courts are also authorized to settle a civil case with the Shari'ah economic and legal mechanisms of the same event with the civil court of the General Courts, the judicial application of the Small claims court mechanism in Religion Court is also possible and prospective,so that regulatory support as well as PERMA No. 2 of 2015 applied to the Religious Courts is required, especially in the process of sharia economic quarrel resolution.
Mediation Effectiveness in Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement: Phenomenology in Bukittinggi Religious Court Hayati, Riska Fauziah; Busyro, Busyro; Bustamar, Bustamar
Alhurriyah Vol 6 No 1 (2021): January - June 2021
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v6i1.4097

Abstract

The main problem in this paper is how the effectiveness of mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution based on PERMA No. 1 of 2016 at the Bukittinggi Religious Court, and what are the inhibiting factors success of mediation. To answer this question, the author uses an inductive and deductive analysis framework regarding the law effectiveness theory of Lawrence M. Friedman. This paper finds that mediation in sharia economic dispute resolution at the Bukittinggi Religious Court from 2016 to 2019 has not been effective. The ineffectiveness is caused by several factors that influence it: First, in terms of legal substance, PERMA No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts still lacks in addressing the problems of the growing community. Second, in terms of legal structure, there are no judges who have mediator certificates. Third, the legal facilities and infrastructure at the Bukittinggi Religious Court have supported mediation. Fourth, in terms of legal culture, there are still many people who are not aware of the law and do not understand mediation well, so they consider mediation to be unimportant. Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang bagaimana efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah berdasarkan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dan apa saja yang menjadi faktor penghambat keberhasilan mediasi. Untuk menjawab pertanyaan tersebut, penulis menggunakan kerangka analisa induktif dan deduktif dengan mengacu pada teori efektivitas hukum Lawrence M. Friedman. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi dari tahun 2016 sampai 2019 belum efektif. Hal ini karena dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor.  Pertama, dari segi substansi hukum, yaitu PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan masih memiliki kekurangan dalam menjawab persoalan masyarakat yang terus berkembang. Kedua, dari segi struktur hukum, belum adanya hakim yang memiliki sertifikat mediator. Ketiga, sarana dan prasarana hukum di Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi sudah mendukung mediasi. Keempat, dari segi budaya hukum, masih banyaknya masyarakat yang tidak sadar hukum dan tidak mengerti persoalan mediasi dengan baik, sehingga menganggap mediasi tidak penting.
Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Jorong Langgam Saiyo Kecamatan Kinali Terhadap Prosedur Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Rahmida, Rahmida; Bustamar, Bustamar
El-Rusyd Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah (STIT) Ahlussunnah Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58485/elrusyd.v10i1.432

Abstract

This study examines the fundamental issue of epistemological tension as well as the potential for synergy between classical integrative methodology and contemporary integrative methodology in the study of Islamic education. The purpose of this study is to analyze in depth the similarities, differences, and potential synthesis of both approaches as an effort to construct a relevant paradigm of Islamic education in the modern era. The research was conducted using a qualitative method with a content analysis approach and comparative analysis. The results indicate that classical integrative methodology is rooted in the concept of wahdat al-‘ilm with a theocentric orientation, whereas contemporary integrative methodology is dialogical, multidisciplinary, and responsive to the development of modern scientific knowledge. A new finding of this study is the importance of reconstructing a methodology that not only preserves the values of tawhid but also promotes social transformation and scientific innovation. The main conclusion of this study is that a synthesis of the two is necessary to produce a transformative-integrative model that is relevant to the needs of Islamic Higher Education Institutions in the era of globalization. These findings are significant for the development of curricula, educational policies, and interdisciplinary research oriented toward forming individuals who are holistic, critical, productive, and contributive.
Co-Authors Alfin, Aidil Busyro, Busyro Dahyul Daipon Edi Rosman Elfiani Hayati, Riska Fauziah Hendri Hendri M Dalil, Fitri Yeni Mak Din, Hairol Anuar Putri, Yulinda Dewi Rahmida Rahmida, Rahmida Safwan Rozi Saiful Amin Zainuddin, Zainuddin