Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.439
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ABDI MASSA: Jurnal Pengabdian Nasional Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia (J-PeHI) Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Lex Scientia Law Review Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Law Research Review Quarterly Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Indonesian Economic Justice Review
Andry Setiawan
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Other

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Legal Protection of Children’s Personal Data in The Digital Age in Indonesia A Comparative of Government Regulation Number 17 of 2025 and General Data Protection Regulation Uni Eropa Yessi Ainurohwati; Andry Setiawan
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 5 (2026): Special Edition Part 1
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i5.48097

Abstract

Advances in digital technology increase the risk of misuse of children’s personal data, thereby placing children as a vulnerable group in the digital space. This study aims to analyze the legal protection of children’s personal data under Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 and compare it with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation. The focus of the study lies on the ability of Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 to provide protection for children’s personal data. This study employs a normative legal methods using a legislative and comparative law approach. The findings indicate that Government Regulation No. 17 of 2025 has established protections through age limits, parental consent, age verification, supervision, and administrative sanctions. However, these provisions remain focused on administrative compliance and are not yet supported by adequate mechanisms for the restoration of children’s rights, including compensation and data deletion, as well as the absence of an independent supervisory authority. This study recommends strengthening aspects of implementation, institutional framework, and recognition of substantive rights so that the protection of children’s personal data can function optimally.
The Legality of Copyright of Artificial Intelligence Video Works on the SORA Platform Under Intellectual Property Law Vincentius Pieter Noehveltino Bonitu Suri; Andry Setiawan
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 5 (2026): Special Edition Part 1
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i5.53989

Abstract

The rapid emergence of Generative artificial intelligence, particularly the Sora platform's text-to-video capabilities, presents unprecedented challenges to the anthropocentric foundations of Indonesian copyright law. The main problem lies in the legal vacuum regarding the authorship and originality of AI-generated videos, as traditional frameworks strictly require a human's personal touch and intellectual contribution. This research aims to analyze the copyright legality of Sora-generated videos under Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, compare the regulatory approaches of the United States and China, and evaluate the juridical consequences of this legal vacuum on the creative industry. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that under Indonesian law, videos generated purely by AI operate outside the scope of copyright and fall into the Public Domain unless a substantial human intervention is proven. Comparatively, the US strictly denies AI authorship based on the idea-expression dichotomy, whereas China progressively recognizes complex prompt engineering as a protectable human intellectual investment. The study concludes that Indonesia must navigate a middle-ground approach by officially recognizing the category of "AI-assisted Works." To prevent industry disruption such as copyright trolling and the spread of low-quality content, the government is urged to update current regulations and establish a specific verification test that requires creators to submit evidence of their iterative creative process and editorial control as a prerequisite for copyright protection.
Juridical Review of Singer’s Voice Publicity Rights in AI Use on Digital Media Platform Sisca Mustika Tiara; Andry Setiawan
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.59280

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed the creative industry. One emerging phenomenon is the use of AI voice cloning technology, which enables the replication of singer's voices without the direct involvement or consent of the original voice owners. This practice raises complex legal issues, particularly concerning the protection of singer's right of publicity as part of their personal and commercial identity. This study examines two primary issues: the juridical review of singer's right of publicity in Indonesia and the forms of legal liability arising from the use of AI on digital media platforms. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, utilizing primary legal materials in the form of relevant legislation and secondary legal materials derived from legal literature and scientific journals. The results indicate that Indonesia has not yet explicitly regulated the protection of singer's voices as an object of right of publicity. However, legal protection may be afforded through the analogy of existing regulations, namely the Copyright Law (UUHC), the Personal Data Protection Law (UU PDP), and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE), as well as through civil liability mechanisms, including cease and desist notices (somasi) and tort claims based on PMH in accordance with the applicable legal provisions. Given the absence of specific regulations governing publicity rights, amendments to the Copyright Law (UUHC) are necessary to ensure effective legal protection and legal certainty for stakeholders in the creative industry, particularly singers, in the era of artificial intelligence.
Legal Protection For Investors Against the Impact of Forced Delisting During Share Buybacks in the Indonesian Capital Market Latifah Ayu Lestari; Andry Setiawan
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 6 (2026): Special Edition Part 2
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i6.62778

Abstract

Forced delisting is a measure taken by the Indonesia Stock Exchange to remove the shares of issuers that no longer meet the requirements for being listed, one of which is due to default. This situation has the potential to cause losses for investors due to the loss of stock liquidity and a reduced opportunity to recover their investment value. One form of legal protection provided to investors is the share buyback mechanism, as stipulated in POJK Number 3/POJK.04/2021. However, in practice, buybacks are often not optimally implemented because issuers experiencing default are generally in financial distress. This study aims to analyze investor legal protection against the impact of forced delisting due to default and examine the obstacles and efforts to optimize buyback implementation in the Indonesian capital market. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case study approach through an analysis of the case of PT Sri Rejeki Isman Tbk (Sritex). The research results indicate that legal protection for investors is stipulated in Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets, Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, and OJK Regulation Number 3/POJK.04/2021. However, the effectiveness of this protection is not optimal because buyback obligations are highly dependent on the issuer's financial capacity. This situation creates a gap between normative regulations and their implementation and results in investors lacking legal certainty when buybacks cannot be implemented. Therefore, regulatory improvements are needed to establish alternative protection mechanisms to ensure legal certainty, fairness, and benefits for investors in the Indonesian capital market.
The Rights of Workers in Indonesia’s Informal Economy: Legal Gaps and Advocacy for Labor Justice Andry Setiawan; Dewi Sulistianingsih
Contemporary Issues on Indonesian Human Rights Law and Policy Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): July, 2024
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/f9hkpx32

Abstract

Indonesia's informal economy accounts for a significant portion of the nation's labor force, yet workers in this sector are highly vulnerable to human rights violations, including wage theft, unsafe working conditions, and the lack of access to social protections. This paper explores the legal gaps in Indonesia's labor laws that fail to cover informal workers, and examines the advocacy efforts aimed at addressing these injustices. Using a combination of legal analysis, interviews with labor activists, and case studies, the study identifies key regulatory weaknesses that leave informal workers unprotected and highlights the role of civil society organizations in pushing for policy reforms. The findings indicate that, despite the substantial contribution of informal workers to the economy, legal frameworks remain focused on formal sector employees, resulting in widespread exploitation. The paper also emphasizes the challenges faced by advocacy groups in garnering state support for these workers' rights. By presenting practical policy recommendations, this research contributes to the growing discourse on labor justice and provides a comprehensive framework for legal reform in Indonesia. The study provides an in-depth analysis of the legal and social barriers that informal workers face, offering new insights into Indonesia's labor law shortcomings and potential reforms. This paper advances the field of labor rights by proposing actionable solutions to bridge the gap between formal labor law protections and the realities of the informal economy, enriching global discussions on labor justice.
The Omnibus Law and Economic Justice: A Critical Analysis of Its Impact on Labor Rights and Social Equity Ratih Damayanti; Andry Setiawan; Bima Wicaksono Nugroho
Indonesian Economic Justice Review Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): May, 2025
Publisher : COLLEGIUM JUSTICIA INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65815/1k8b7n05

Abstract

This paper critically examines Indonesia's controversial Omnibus Law, which was introduced as a major reform to streamline regulations, improve the business climate, and attract foreign investment. While the law is hailed for its potential to enhance economic growth, it has raised significant concerns regarding labor rights and social equity. This study explores the key provisions of the Omnibus Law, focusing on its impact on labor regulations, job security, and workers’ rights. The paper analyzes how the law’s deregulation of labor markets, particularly its relaxation of rules on minimum wages, severance pay, and outsourcing, affects income inequality and job quality, particularly for vulnerable workers in low-wage sectors. Furthermore, the study investigates how the law’s broader economic objectives—such as promoting foreign direct investment—might disproportionately benefit multinational corporations and wealthy elites, while exacerbating existing social and economic disparities. By examining both the legal provisions and the socio-economic outcomes of the Omnibus Law, the paper argues that while it may stimulate economic growth, it risks undermining social equity and labor justice. The paper concludes by suggesting policy reforms that balance economic development with the protection of workers’ rights and the promotion of inclusive growth.
Co-Authors Afifah Widyastuti Agnes Widananti Aisyah Hanum Khoirunnisa Alif Farhan Bima Wicaksono Nugroho Bryan Rois Putra Adyaksa Dewi Sulistianingsih Dina Ristanti Hanifah Is'aad Ibadurrahman Hanan Abdullah Latifah Ayu Lestari Muhamad Fajar Irfandi MUHAMMAD INDRA MUHTAR Rahayu, Sang Ayu Putu Ratih Damayanti Rindia Fanny Kusumaningtyas Safira Maharani Sisca Mustika Tiara Uswatun Khasanah Vincentius Pieter Noehveltino Bonitu Suri Yessi Ainurohwati