Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Ethical meaning and academic responsibility in Generative Artificial Intelligence policy in higher education Fransiskus Xaverius Sabu; Taufik Asmiyanto
Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Vol 22 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Library and Archive, Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/bip.v22i1.22005

Abstract

Introduction. This study interprets policy texts on Generative AI in higher education through an ethical and existential lens, using a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach to explore how they cultivate critical awareness and ethical responsibility in AI use for learning. Research Methods. The research uses Paul Ricoeur’s hermeneutic phenomenological approach to analyze GenAI policy texts in higher education, revealing how the constructs that shape ethically oriented AI discourse. Data Analysis. The data analyzed consist of policy texts on the use of GenAI in higher education. The analyses were conducted through thematic coding to identify the main topics, followed by hermeneutic interpretation to reveal the deeper meaning constructed by the texts within the context of ethics and education. Result. The analysis revealed four key findings: the interpretation of GenAI as a learning aid, the emphasis on ethics and academic integrity, the tension between regulation and institutional autonomy, and the transformation of the lecturer-student relationship. Collectively, these findings indicate that GenAI policies cultivate a new awareness of the ethical use of technology within higher education institutions. Conclusion. The GenAI policy is not merely a technical guide but a discourse that shapes the academic community’s ethical awareness, fostering a critical and responsible use through a hermeneutic-phenomenologicallens.
Transformasi Representasi Arsip di Era Digital (Kajian Literatur 2015-2024) Arvia Earwantama; Kartika Puspita Sari; Meilani Mega Juwita; Nurul Habib Romadhan; Taufik Asmiyanto
Library Insights Journal Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Library Insight Journal
Publisher : Pusat Perpustakaan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/lij.v2i2.50300

Abstract

Periode 2015–2024 menandai lonjakan digitalisasi arsip dalam skala global. Namun, representasi arsip digital masih didominasi narasi institusional yang berisiko meminggirkan suara komunitas. Metode yang digunakan adalah critical literature review terhadap dua puluh artikel dalam Archival Science terbitan 2015–2024. Data dianalisis menggunakan matriks relevansi berdasarkan fokus studi, aktor dominan, subjek termarginalkan, bentuk representasi arsip, pendekatan partisipatif, diakhiri kritik dominasi institusi melalui pendekatan Foucault. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa metadata dan sistem deskripsi arsip bekerja sebagai teknologi kuasa yang menyaring pengetahuan, mengesampingkan konteks komunitas lokal, dan menyederhanakan makna sosial. Subjek marginal seringkali dieksklusi dari narasi arsip digital melalui sistem otomasi yang bias. Meski demikian, sejumlah artikel menawarkan praktik resistensi melalui arsip komunitas dan model postcustodial. Hasil analisis menunjukkan representasi arsip masih didominasi institusi besar, sehingga diperlukan kebijakan metadata yang inklusif, partisipatif, dan adil secara sosial untuk mendorong keadilan representasi di era digital.