Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Comparative Analysis of Musculoskeletal Disorder Between Female and Male Mechanical Pickers in Gambung Tea Plantation, West Java Silvia Senjaya; Yayuk Yuliati; Dhia Al-Uyun; Kralawi Sita
WIDYAKALA: JOURNAL OF PEMBANGUNAN JAYA UNIVERSITY Vol 9, No 2 (2022): Urban Lifestyle and Urban Development
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat UPJ

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (524.388 KB) | DOI: 10.36262/widyakala.v9i2.570

Abstract

Previous research has shown that musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are one of the barriers for women to adopting tea-picking mechanization technology. Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are defined as a group of injuries that affect the musculoskeletal system including nerves, tendons, muscles, and supporting structures. MSDs are also referred to as injuries due to overactivity or from using a device excessively. Some research results significantly show that gender greatly affects the level of risk of autonomic complaints and that women are more likely to show musculoskeletal symptoms than men. This study examines the comparison of musculoskeletal disorders due to the use of tea picking machines for male and female pickers.  Data collection on musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) complaints was carried out using the Nordic Body Map instrument, in the form of an open questionnaire by interviewing mechanical tea pickers directly. From the data obtained, the average difference in scores for male mechanical tea pickers is 5.3 while the average difference in scores for female mechanical tea pickers is 9. This means that the average female mechanical tea pickers experience musculoskeletal complaints 70% more height than male mechanical tea pickers. MSDs complaints comparison between male and female tea pickers with NBM measurement is 5:9. In conclusion, female mechanical tea pickers suffer from MSDs almost twice as much as males. Considering that the majority of tea pickers are women, gender-responsive machine design interventions are needed.
Fostering Child-Friendly Schools Through Strengthened School-Parent Partnerships: Addressing Violence and Bullying Against Female Students in Senior High Schools Sonya Veronika Nggauk; Lucky Endrawati; Dhia Al Uyun
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Vol 17, No 2 (2025): JUNE 2025
Publisher : STAI Hubbulwathan Duri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.6329

Abstract

Creating a child-friendly school environment requires collaborative efforts between schools and parents, particularly in combating violence and bullying targeting female students. This study explores how school-parent partnerships can enhance student safety and foster inclusivity in senior high schools. Using a qualitative case study approach, research was conducted in three private senior high schools in Malang, Indonesia (SMA A, SMA B, and SMA C). Data collection methods included in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis involving principals, teachers, parents, and students. The findings indicate that strong school-parent collaboration significantly reduces gender-based violence, such as body shaming and sexual harassment. These partnerships improved communication, encouraged joint prevention efforts, and strengthened a shared sense of responsibility among stakeholders. A safer and more inclusive school climate emerged, positively impacting the well-being of female students. Effective engagement between schools and families plays a strategic role in establishing protective systems and promoting a respectful school culture. The study underlines the importance of gender-sensitive strategies and inclusive school policies in creating supportive learning environments. To ensure all students, particularly girls, feel protected, schools should strengthen communication with parents and involve them in safety initiatives. This research underscores the crucial role of school-parent collaboration in addressing gender-specific issues and advancing child-friendly educational spaces.
LEGITIMACY OF IMMEDIATE EXECUTABLE JUDGMENT (UITVOERBAAR BIJ VOORRAAD) IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT Gerry Geovant Supranata Kaban; Afifah Kusumadara; Dhia Al Uyun
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2702

Abstract

The immediate executable judgment (uitvoerbaar bij voorraad) is a form of judgment in civil procedural law that can be executed first, even though it does not yet have permanent legal force (inkracht van gewijsde). In the context of small claims court, the issuance of an immediate executable judgment raises questions regarding its legitimacy and implications for the principles of justice and legal certainty. This research aims to analyze the legitimacy of issuing immediate executable judgment in small claims court cases through juridical aspects. The research method used is normative juridical with a normative legal research approach and a conceptual approach. The data used includes relevant legal regulations, court decisions, and relevant legal literature. The research results indicate that judges have the authority and legitimate legitimacy to issue immediate executable judgment when examining, adjudicating, and deciding small claims court cases while still adhering to the strict terms and conditions outlined in Article 180 paragraph (1) of the HIR and Article 191 paragraph (1) of the RBg junctis SEMA Number 3 of 2000 concerning Immediate Executable Judgment (Uitvoerbaar bij Voorraad) and Provisional, to ensure aspects of legal certainty, usefulness, and justice.