Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

KAJIAN FEMINISME TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN Adlhiyati, Zakki; Kurniawan, Itok Dwi; Soehartono, Soehartono; Harjono, Harjono; Yulianti, Sri Wahyuningsih; Septiningsih, Ismawati
Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Prodi PPkn Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Terjadi perubahan atas eksistensi perempuan sebagai suatu subjek yang independen. Hal ini terlihat dari adanya perubahan relasi antara perempuan dengan laki-laki pada saat ini. Meskipun demikian, Undang-undang Perkawinan (UUP) ternyata belum memberikan perlindungan kepada perempuan atas kesetaraan gender. UUP masih membedakan hak serta kewajiban perempuan dengan laki-laki terkait persyaratan poligami UUP focus pada ketidakmampuan fisik perempuan sebagai alasan poligami. Ketentuan-ketentuan tersebut menempatkan perempuan pada posisi inferior. Feminisme menghendaki adanya pengakuan terhadap perempuan sebagai subjek yang mandiri dengan persamaan status, hak dan kewajiban dengan laki-laki. Oleh sebab itu perlu adanya perubahan pola pikir Negara dan pemberian pengakuan kepada perempuan sebagai suatu subjek yang independen, dari situ diharapkan negara dapat memberikan kesetaraan gender kepada perempuan.

Penalaran Hukum: Bagaimana Merek Terkenal Diposisikan Melalui Positivisme Hukum Adlhiyati, Zakki; Achmad, Achmad
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 17, No 1 (2023): March Edition
Publisher : Law and Human Rights Research and Development Agency

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2023.V17.55-68

Legal protection for well-known mark needs to be examined. Indonesia has tried to conform its legal system with international law, most notably the Paris Convention and the TRIPS Agreement. However, the court’s decision indicates that the well-known mark remains unfavourable. This paper aimed to analyse judges’ rationale when they rejected a lawsuit against a well-known trademark in Indonesia which was the trademark dispute of “Starbucks” and Pierre “Cardin”. This study was conducted using legal research methods and it examined legal materials from judges’ decisions and literature review. Therefore, knowing the judge’s rationale for dismissing the claim is essential. In the first case, the plaintiff’s documented evidence was insufficient to establish the respondent’s bad faith, but the judge’s justification for rejecting the lawsuit was insufficient either. Meanwhile, in the second case, the judge denied the claim based on ne bis in idem, which aims to reach legal certainty, so the judge can lean more toward positivism. The positivism requires clear rules so as not to cause multiple interpretations. However, trademark and geographical indication law does not give complete regulations on well-known marks. As a result, problems and conflicts frequently arise in practice when it comes to the protection of well-known marks.

Perbuatan Melawan Hukum terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Masyarakat Adat Yusriyyah, Ririh Titis; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Vol 12, No 1: April 2024
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jolsic.v12i1.83655

This article analyzes the tort of dispute over ownership of land rights located on customary land. The purpose of this article is to determine the unlawful acts against the law on disputes over ownership of land rights of indigenous peoples by examining the Decision of the Judge of the Kolaka District Court Number 31/Pdt.G/2021/PN Kka. The research method used is doctrinal or normative legal research. This research is descriptive in nature. The method of collecting legal materials by means of library research or document studies and legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study discuss the customary law of land tenure in the Tolaki-mekongga indigenous community based on clearing forests, inheriting (Tiari), gifts or gifts of people (Pomboweehinotono), expiration (Puta), legal purchase (Mo'oli). Land tenure without these five methods is illegal because it has violated applicable customary law. Based on the results of research and discussion to answer the problem, it can be concluded that the unlawful act in the Kolaka District Court Decision Number 31/Pdt.G/2021/PN Kka regarding unlawful acts related to ownership of Kolaka customary land is a unlawful act categorized as unlawful acts against decency.

STUDI TENTANG PROSES MEDIASI DENGAN MEDIATOR HAKIM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SUKOHARJO Sari, Annisa Mutiara; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 11, No 1 (2023): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i1.71649

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa alasan banyaknya kegagalan mediasi dengan mediator hakim dan untuk mengetahui perspektif hakim selaku mediator dalam proses mediasi sengketa tanah di Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo. Dalam penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Jenis data yang digunakan merupakan data primer yaitu hasil wawancara dengan Bapak Candra Nurendra A., SH.,KN, M.Hum., selaku hakim mediator di Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo dan data sekunder berupa studi putusan perkara Nomor 74/Pdt.G/2018/Pn Skh dan studi putusan Nomor 14/Pdt.G/Pn Skh serta studi kepustakaan. Teknik untuk pengumpulan data adalah wawancara dan studi kepustakaan dengan teknik analisis data kualitatif. Berdasarkan penelitian ini memperoleh hasil bahwa penyelesaian sengketa tanah di Pengadilan Negeri Sukoharjo adalah para pihak yang saling emosi, kuasa hukum yang menghambat proses mediasi karena ada beberapa kuasa hukum yang memilih memenangkan perkara di Pengadilan, ketidak hadiran salah satu pihak dalam proses mediasi, masyarakat banyak yang tidak paham akan manfaat mediasi, kedua belah pihak yang memiliki kepentingan yang saling bertentangan dan memiliki ambisi untuk menang. Perspektif hakim selaku mediator, menurutnya cara untuk menengahi para pihak yang bersengketa harus memahami terlebih dahulu apa yang menjadi keinginan para pihak bisa dengan cara kaukus serta mengajak para pihak untuk berfikir dengan kepala dingin, tenang, dan menjaga ketertiban pada saat mediasi berlangsung serta menunjukan sikap yang lemah lembut agar para pihak dapat meredam emosi sehingga seorang mediator harus bisa meyakinkan kepada kedua belah pihak yang bersengketa dalam bentuk komunikasi verbal, selain itu seorang mediator harus bersikap sabar dengan situasi yang ada.Keywords: Perdata; Mediasi; Sengketa Tanah; Litigasi.This article aims to analyze the reasons for the many failures of mediation with judge mediators and to find out the perspective of judges as mediators in the land dispute mediation process at the Sukoharjo District Court. In this study using descriptive empirical legal research. The type of data used is primary data, namely the results of interviews with Mr. Candra Nurendra A., SH., KN, M.Hum., as a mediator judge at the Sukoharjo District Court and secondary data in the form of a study of case decisions No. 74/Pdt.G/2018/ Pn Skh and study of decision No. 14/Pdt.G/Pn Skh and study of literature. Techniques for collecting data are interviews and literature studies with qualitative data analysis techniques. Based on this research, it was found that the settlement of land disputes at the Sukoharjo District Court were parties who were mutually emotional, attorneys who hindered the mediation process because there were several attorneys who chose to win cases in court, the absence of one of the parties in the mediation process, many people who do not understand the benefits of mediation, both parties have conflicting interests and have the ambition to win. From the perspective of the judge as a mediator, according to him, the way to mediate between the disputing parties is to understand in advance what the parties wish to do, by caucusing and inviting the parties to think with a cool head, be calm, and maintain order during mediation and show a positive attitude. gentle so that the parties can reduce their emotions so that a mediator must be able to convince both parties to the dispute in the form of verbal communication, besides that a mediator must be patient with the existing situation. Keywords: Civil; Mediation; Land dispute; Litigation.

BAGAIMANA PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM TERHADAP KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PERKARA PENCABULAN ANAK PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR: 36/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Lbb Akbar, Ricky Febriyansyah; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.101940

This paper aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of testimonium de auditu (hearsay witness testimony) in a child molestation case, as addressed in Decision No. 36/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Lbb. The research method employed is normative or doctrinal legal research, which is prescriptive and applied in nature. The approach used in this study is a case study approach. The legal materials utilized consist of both primary and secondary sources. Primary legal materials include statutory regulations and court decisions, while secondary legal materials comprise books, legal journals, theses/dissertations, and online sources. The legal materials were collected through a literature study and analyzed using syllogistic deduction, based on major and minor premises. The study concludes that the hearsay witness testimonies submitted in this case were not taken into consideration by the judges, as they originated from unsworn witnesses and were inconsistent, thereby failing to establish judicial conviction.

ASAS LEGITIMA PERSONA STANDI IN JUDICIO DALAM PERLAWANAN LELANG EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN PIHAK KETIGA Alyssa, Ima; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.98355

The purpose of this article is to examine the implementation of the principle of Legitima Persona Standi in Judicio in opposition lawsuits against the execution of mortgage rights auction, as seen in Decision Number 4/Pdt.G/2024/PN Lmg. In this case, the opposing party acts as a third party replacing the position of the deceased debtor. Based on this, it is interesting to analyze whether the third party has legal standing as regulated under the principle of Legitima Persona Standi in Judicio. The principle of Legitima Persona Standi in Judicio plays a crucial role in determining the parties who have the right and capacity to file lawsuits in court, particularly in assessing the legal standing of third parties. The research method used in this study is normative or doctrinal legal research. The panel of judges assessed that the opposing party, who is the legitimate wife and legal heir of the debtor, has a legal interest in the auction object. The judges also considered the opposing party's legal relationship with the disputed object, including her involvement in the collateral agreement. In its ruling, the panel of judges stated that based on the principle of Legitima Persona Standi in Judicio, the opposing party as a third party has legal standing because she demonstrates good faith, a legal relationship, and fulfills the formal requirements as an heir under Articles 830 and 1100 of the Civil Code, as well as Article 163 of the HIR (Herzien Inlandsch Reglement). Moreover, the analysis concluded that the opposing party has a direct legal interest, possesses legal capacity (cakap hukum), and has suffered clear and tangible losses. Therefore, the opposing party meets the criteria to be considered a party with legal standing to file an objection to the auction.

TELAAH PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM PT ANTAM DAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 158/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Sby Iskandar, Salma Amelinda; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i1.81978

Dalam putusan perkara Tort Nomor 158/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Sby, Hakim mengabulkan gugatan Tort kepada PT Antam. Pasal ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah perbuatan PT Antam sejalan dengan unsur perbuatan melawan hukum dalam Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata dan/atau ketentuan Putusan Hoge Raad tahun 1919. Lebih lanjut, mendalami pertimbangan hukum dibalik keputusan Hakim yang mengabulkan gugatan Perbuatan Perbuatan Palsu Budi Said. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa perbuatan PT Antam memenuhi unsur perbuatan melawan hukum, kerugian, kesalahan, dan sebab akibat sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata. Putusan Hoge Raad tahun 1919 semakin mendukung perluasan makna Tort, dengan menegaskan bahwa tindakan PT Antam melanggar hak dan kewajiban hukum Budi Said sendiri. Melalui pertimbangannya, hakim menilai PT Antam telah melakukan perbuatan yang merugikan Budi Said. PT Antam terbukti melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum yang mengakibatkan kerugian baik materil maupun immateriil bagi Budi Said, yang dibuktikan dengan tidak diterimanya 1.136 kg emas dan yang terakhir ditunjukkan melalui resume kesehatan dan laporan usaha sebagai indikator kerugian sementara. kenikmatan hidup.

KEDUDUKAN BUKTI ILMIAH DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERDATA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP Utomo, Prasetyo; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i1.98523

Decision Number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh is a verdict issued by the Sukoharjo District Court, handling a civil environmental case filed by residents affected by water and air pollution caused by waste discharged by PT Rayon Utama Makmur (PT RUM). This case was examined using the class action mechanism. In this decision, there is an interesting aspect to study, namely the plaintiffs, who are the residents, and the defendant, PT RUM, both submitted scientific evidence to prove their claims and defenses. This article aims to analyze and examine the position and application of scientific evidence in environmental dispute case number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh. This article uses a normative-empirical legal research method with a case study approach using data collection techniques, namely interviews and literature studies, which are analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that in this case, the judge based the position and application of scientific evidence on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2023 concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating Environmental Cases, in which the position of scientific evidence is the result of research which is then supported by expert testimony in court. In case number 29/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Skh, the Plaintiff submitted 14 pieces of evidence of research on testing the air and water of the Gupit River, which was reinforced by 2 expert testimonies in court. Meanwhile, the Defendant submitted 8 pieces of scientific evidence consisting of testing the quality standards of waste discharged from production activities through the results of wastewater and air testing, supported by one expert testimony in court. Although the Plaintiff submitted conclusive scientific evidence, the Panel of Judges rejected all of the Plaintiff's claims against the Defendant and stated that the act of pollution committed by the Defendant was not proven. Thus, PT RUM was declared to have not committed any unlawful act

TELAAH PERBUATAN MELANGGAR HUKUM PT ANTAM DAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 158/PDT.G/2020/PN.SBY Iskandar, Salma Amelinda; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 12, No 2 (2024): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i2.83396

Terhadap putusan perkara PMH (Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum) Nomor 158/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Sby, Hakim mengabulkan gugatan PMH kepada PT Antam. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah perbuatan PT Antam telah sesuai dengan unsur-unsur PMH yang ada pada Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata dan/atau ketentuan Putusan Hoge Raad 1919. Selain itu perlu untuk diketahui bagaimana pertimbangan hukum Hakim dalam mengabulkan gugatan PMH Budi Said. Artikel ini diteliti menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif (kepustakaan). Hasil penelitian yang dihasilkan mengindikasikan bahwa perbuatan PT Antam telah memenuhi unsur perbuatan melanggar hukum, unsur kerugian, unsur kesalahan, dan unsur kausalitas yang ada pada ketentuan Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata. Unsur demikian diperkuat dengan perluasan pemaknaan PMH dalam Putusan Hoge Raad 1919 bahwa perbuatan PT Antam telah bertentangan dengan Hak Budi Said sekaligus bertentangan dengan kewajiban hukumnya sendiri. Melalui pertimbangannya, Hakim menilai bahwa PT Antam telah melakukan perbuatan yang merugikan Budi Said. PT Antam terbukti melakukan PMH yang menyebabkan kerugian materiil dan immateriil bagi Budi Said. Kerugian materiil dibuktikan dengan tidak diterimanya 1.136 kg emas. Sedangkan kerugian immateriil dibuktikan melalui resume kesehatan dan laporan bisnis yang Penulis representasikan sebagai unsur hilangnya kenikmatan hidup sementara.Kata Kunci: PMH; PT Antam; Pertimbangan Hakim.

KEABSAHAN DAN KEKUATAN HUKUM PEMBUATAN PERJANJIAN DAMAI YANG MENYIMPANG DARI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN Ramadhani, Muhamad Daffa; Adlhiyati, Zakki
Verstek Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i1.86223

Artikel ini membahas mengenai suatu perjanjian perdamaian yang dibuat untuk menghindari keputusan pengadilan. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah perjanjian perdamaian yang dibuat pasca putusan inkracht dapat dikatakan sah dan bagaimana terhadap pelaksanaan eksekusi apakah dapat dilaksanakan setelah dibuatnya perjanjian perdamaian yang menghindari eksekusi pengadilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif-empiris yang bersifat deskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah pendekatan undang-undang serta pendekatan kasus. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan cara studi kepustakaan serta wawancara dengan penggunaan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang disepakati bahwa perjanjian yang dibuat pasca keputusan inkracht oleh para pihak yang dituangkan dalam Perjanjian Perjanjian Perdamaian Nomor 1 tertanggal 10 Januari 2017 dan Akta Kesepakatan Bersama Nomor 3 tertanggal 2 Februari 2017 tidak dapat dikatakan sah karena belum terpenuhinya salah satu tidak yakin syarat sahnya Perjanjian Perdamaian yang menyebabkan perjanjian tersebut tidak dapat dibatalkan. .

Title

Found 14 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 14 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 14 Documents
Search