Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Jurnal Pijar MIPA
Paramita, Uci Vebia
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Education Mathematics Physics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE CONTRIBUTION OF TOULMIN'S ARGUMENTATION PATTERNS IN PHYSICS LEARNING IN INDONESIA: LITERATURE REVIEW Amiruddin, Mohd Zaidi Bin; Sari, Eka Putri Dian Nata; Paramita, Uci Vebia; Suliyanah, Suliyanah; Admoko, Setyo
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Vol 14, No 1 (2023): January 2023
Publisher : Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (323.021 KB) | DOI: 10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55338

Abstract

This research is a descriptive research using literature study method which aims to analyze how far is the contribution of Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) in learning physics in Indonesia. The data collection technique used is a review of articles from previous studies related to the application of Toulmin's argument in learning physics. Sources of data used four articles in this research is secondary data. The data obtained were then analyzed using the, organize method, namely organizing the articles to be reviewed, synthesize, which combines the results of organizing articles into an integrated literature,  Identify, which is to identify articles to draw conclusions. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the application of Toulmin's Argumentation in learning Physics in Indonesia has many contributions such as in mastering concepts, problem solving abilities, and especially in improving students' argumentation skills. It is also known that the application of the argumentation-based learning model should be collaborated with problem-based learning models and discussion methods to train students' argument structure preparation. So, for build good argumentation skills, directed teaching is needed by utilizing Toulmin's argumentation pattern.
Identifying Student Misconceptions on Momentum and Impulse Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument with CRI Paramita, Uci Vebia; Jauhariyah, Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6086

Abstract

Identification of students' misconceptions is crucial in Physics learning as an evaluation tool to address and reduce these misconceptions. This study aims to assess the quality of a four-tier diagnostic test using the CRI instrument, assisted by JotForm, and describe the profile of students' misconceptions related to momentum and impulse. The quality of the instrument is evaluated based with validity and reliability. The research follows the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) method. The instrument is developed during the analysis, design, and development stages. The implementation and evaluation stages involve capturing the profile and causes of students' misconceptions. The instrument's quality is assessed based on theoretical validity, which reached 89.29%. Empirical content validity haved percentages of false positives 6.93%and false negatives 6.53%. The empirical validity of the construct, with a significance level of 0.05, resulted in an rtableof 0.273. From the 15 questions tested, 12 questions were found to have empirical validity, and a reliability score of 0.475 was obtained. The study revealed that 3 students had low misconceptions, 14 students had medium misconceptions, and 6 students had high misconceptions. The causes of students' misconceptions were primarily false positives and humanistic thinking, accounting for 28.56%. In conclusion, the instrument developed in this study is valid and reliable, and it effectively identifies the profile and causes of students' misconceptions.
Co-Authors Amiruddin, Mohd Zaidi Bin Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul Jauhariyah Sari, Eka Putri Dian Nata Setyo Admoko SULIYANAH SULIYANAH