Muhammad Rifqo Hafidzudin Farid
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) During the COVID-19 Pandemic Juliana; Nadya Wulandari Alshanti; Tamara Aulia Fakhrinnisa; Nanda Amalia Ramadhanti; Arya Fadlilah Pradana; Revantoro Artha Dwiprawira; Razita Aulia Azkia; Rafid Rabbani Rizkiawan; Muhammad Hafizh; Avianita Dewi Kusumawardhani; Fanny Gunawan; Manika Putri Kunigara; Junjungan Nimasratu Rahmatsani; Hubah Asyiroh; Derryl Rasad Texaga; Firda Fauziah Hidayat; Gading Yudha Pratama; Aldo Aditya Suprijadi; Tomas Marcelino Adistika Martin; Muhammad Rifqo Hafidzudin Farid; Salma Fadila; Adristi Hanun Naziliah; Putu Laksmi Febriyani; Clarisa Christina Gabriella; As'ad Naufal; Ananda Shafira Dwiyanti; Nabila Rosalina Putri
Jurnal Psikiatri Surabaya Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): May
Publisher : Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jps.v13i1.29425

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic, present in Indonesia for 17 months, has significantly impacted mental health, especially in individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Studies in Europe reported a 17.9% to 60.3% increase in OCD symptom severity. Notably, no research in Indonesia has explored the pandemic's effects on OCD patients. Lockdown measures in Indonesia may exacerbate symptoms, but some OCD patients benefit, finding relief from societal stigmatization and the opportunity to advise others on infection prevention. This review aims to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on OCD patients in Indonesia and discuss potential management strategies. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search, identifying studies, articles, and reports relevant to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on OCD patients in Indonesia. These sources were critically evaluated to provide a comprehensive overview. Results: This review reveals that the pandemic poses unique challenges to OCD patients in Indonesia. Lockdown measures may worsen symptoms, although some patients find relief from societal stigmatization. OCD patients can play a valuable role in advising others on infection prevention. Telemedicine, especially CBT, and medication adherence tools are crucial for effective management. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic affects OCD patients in Indonesia in various ways. It is essential to recognize how lockdown measures impact symptom severity and the opportunities for patients to contribute positively to society. Telemedicine and medication adherence tools are valuable for managing OCD during the pandemic. Addressing the needs of OCD patients and implementing effective strategies for their care during COVID-19 is essential in Indonesia.
Development of a Community Participation Index as an Environmental Health Effort in Control Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in Surabaya Muhammad Farid Dimjati Lusno; Siti Zubaidah; Ririh Yudhastuti; Hari Basuki Notobroto; Muhammad Rifqo Hafidzudin Farid; Abdul Fattah Farid; Rahmat bin Dapari
JURNAL KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL KESEHATAN LINGKUNGAN
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jkl.v18i1.2026.72-84

Abstract

Introduction: Dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) remains a critical public health challenge in Surabaya, Indonesia. Despite intensive efforts, standardized measures for assessing community involvement in DHF control are lacking. This study addresses the gap by developing a Community Participation Index (CPI) that encompasses 3M Plus actions (drain, cover, recycle water containers plusother preventive actions), opportunities, and collective action at the household level, providing a comprehensive, quantitative tool to evaluate and guide intervention strategies. Methods: An analytical observational case-control design was conducted, involving 1,880 households, selected through stratified random sampling from 47 health centers across diverse epidemiological and demographic zones. Data collection included structured questionnaires, household interviews, and direct observation, with validity and reliability ensured by Cronbach alpha 0.74 and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The “One House One Jumantik” program, introduced nationally since 2016 and locally in Surabaya since 2017, served as a focal intervention to increase active community monitoring and participation. Results and Discussion: The CPI model demonstrated satisfactory fit (CFI 0.92, RMSEA 0.06), with opportunity and collective action recognized as the strongest contributors. The implementation of “One House One Jumantik” correlated with increased engagement and improved 3M Plus practices, resulting in lower DHF incidence. Biases related to sampling and self-reporting weremitigated through careful design and data triangulation. Conclusion: The CPI offers significant practical value for DHF surveillance, targeted interventions, and policy formulation. Strengthening ongoing education, improving access, and adapting programs to local contexts are essential for bridging gaps between awareness and sustainable action.