Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Well Being Kibas Cenderawasih : Jurnal Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan Unnes Journal of Mathematics Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Ratna Nurhayati, Ratna
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
THE IMPLICATIONS OF EXPANDING THE AUTHORITY OF THE PRETRIAL POST-VERDICT JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN DECIDING WHETHER IT IS A VALID DETERMINATION OF THE SUSPECT AGAINST LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE SUSPECT Gumbira, Seno Wibowo; Nurhayati, Ratna; Wahyuni, Purwaningdyah Murti
Yustisia Vol 7, No 1: April 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i1.19014

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are implications of expanding the authority of the pretrial post-verdict judicial review of Constitutional Court in deciding whether it is a valid determination of the suspect against law enforcement and the protection of the rights of the suspect. This research belongs to normative research. The results of this study explain that the interpretation method used in pretrial decision  No:04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.Jak.Sel is the method of discovery of analogy interpretation law (argumentum per analogiam) is wrong, while the legal interpretation method used in the judicial review judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 is the historical interpretation method (historiche intepretatie) the problem namely, the Constitutional Court has exceeded its original function that is negative legislator became positive legislators form or add a new norm. So that raises the problem that is contrary to the principles of the criminal justice system that is the principle of quick and simple and low budget justice and the principle of litis finiri oportet also inhibits the process of law enforcement settlement.
Co-Authors .Daryono, Daryono Effendi, Zainudin Fatoni, Imam Gumbir, Seno Wibowo Gumbir, Seno Wibowo Hendry, Yosse Iwan Asmadi Kartono , Ristiyono, Mohamad Pandu Rochmad - Seno Wibowo Gumbira, Seno Wibowo Seno Wibowo, Seno Sugiarto, Kresna Bagus Sutartono, Sutartono Wahyuni, Purwaningdyah Murti Windrati, Nila Kusuma Zahra Zahra