Indah Maulidya
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TIPE-TIPE KEPRIBADIAN PADA TOKOH UTAMA DALAM NOVEL RETAK KARYA AZHARA NATASYA DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA INDONESIA Indah Maulidya; Hilda Hilaliyah; Irham Ramdani
Alegori: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2022): Alegori : Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (201.915 KB) | DOI: 10.30998/.v2i02.8313

Abstract

Development of a Mathematical Reasoning Test for Prospective Mathematics Teachers SABRINA APRILIA; Elisa Mutiara Fatmadewi; Ahmad Taufik Hidayat; Nafa Nur Rakhima; Indah Maulidya; Nuriana Rachmani Dewi
Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Learning Innovation
Publisher : Postgraduate, Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ujmer.v1i1.58637

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a mathematical reasoning test that is valid, reliable, possesses good discriminating power, and has an appropriate level of item difficulty for assessing the mathematical reasoning ability of prospective mathematics teachers. A descriptive quantitative method was employed to examine the characteristics of nine test items in terms of validity, reliability, discriminating power, and item difficulty. The participants were 21 fourth-year students from Semarang State University. The findings indicated that all test items met the validity criteria, with a reliability coefficient of 0.75, which is classified as high. In terms of discriminating power, six items were categorized as good, while three items were classified as satisfactory. Regarding item difficulty, seven items were categorized as easy and two as moderate. Overall, the developed mathematical reasoning test is suitable for assessing the mathematical reasoning ability of prospective mathematics teachers, as it satisfies the criteria of validity, reliability, and good discriminating power. This study is expected to serve as a reference for the development of mathematical reasoning assessment instruments in higher education. Nevertheless, further research is recommended to refine the distribution of item difficulty, thereby producing an instrument with a more balanced and varied range of difficulty levels.