Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum

HUKUM, MORAL, DAN KEKUASAAN DALAM TELAAH (Hukum adalah Alat Teknis Sosial) Fithriatus Shalihah; Oksep Adhayanto
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10 No 4 (2016)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no4.735

Abstract

AbstractThe negative impact of the use of law as a means of changing society in authoritarian countries is seen already clear when in authority a regime that was decades on authority in Indonesia. The regime overcome all the forces that exist in society and the bureaucracy is crucial. Political parties in that era were not independent. The decisions in the field of legislation more influenced by the government's political vision. Here, the law has been used as synonymous with power, so that can not be distinguished more clearly, where the law where power, where “rechtsstaat” and where “machtstaat”, where state laws and which countries tyranny legitimized by law. The law should be given charges philosophical truth values are deduced from the principles of the law by the authorities, in fact the loaded power itself that must be regarded as truth. Manipulation of the truth that's going on here is misdirection logic through language games that the law is the same as the laws in the flow of positivism. Keywords: Legal, Moral and Authority AbstrakDampak negatif penggunaan hukum sebagai sarana perubahan masyarakat dalam negara otoriter terlihat sudah secara terang benderang ketika berkuasanya sebuah rezim yang puluhan tahun berkuasa di Indonesia. Rezim tersebut mengatasi semua kekuatan yang ada dalam masyarakat dan birokrasinya sangat menentukan. Partai-partai politik pada era itu tidak mandiri. Keputusan-keputusan di bidang legislasi lebih banyak diwarnai oleh visi politik pemerintah. Disini hukum telah dijadikan identik dengan kekuasaan, sehingga tidak dapat dibedakan lagi secara tegas, mana hukum mana kekuasaan, mana rechtsstaat dan mana machtstaat, mana negara hukum dan mana negara tirani yang dilegitimasi secara hukum. Hukum yang seharusnya diberi muatan-muatan nilai-nilai kebenaran filosofis yang dideduksi dari asas-asas hukum oleh kekuasaan, pada kenyataanya diberi muatan kekuasaan itu sendiri yang harus dipandang sebagai kebenaran. Manipulasi kebenaran yang terjadi disini berakar penyesatan logika melalui permainan bahasa (language of the game) bahwa hukum itu sama dengan undang-undang dalam aliran positivisme. Kata Kunci: Hukum, Moral, dan Kekuasaan 
Comparison of the President Prerogative Rights in Indonesia Constitutions Oksep Adhayanto; Irman Irman; Fithriatus Shalihah
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v12no3.1329

Abstract

Prerogative rights can be interpreted as privileges or privileges, The Indonesian constitutional history that has used several constitutions indirectly has implications for the practice of the use of prerogative rights in Indonesia. This study research on the preogrative rights of the President in the Constitutions of Indonesia. The approach used in this study is normative juridical with the law approach model. It is concluded that the use of prerogative rights has ups and downs influenced by the concept of checks and balances and distribution of power. Therefore, the use of prerogative rights as in the previous constitution is more directed to heavy executives who do not require confirmation to other state institutions, now it has begun to be restricted so the use of the term prerogative privileges is no longer pure as before. Keyword: President, Prerogative Rights, Indonesia Constitution
Observations on the Protection of Refugees in Indonesia Fithriatus Shalihah; Muhammad Nur
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 15 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v15no4.2143

Abstract

Pekanbaru City and Makassar City are areas that serve as refugee shelters in Indonesia. Generally, refugees in Pekanbaru City and Makassar City were only transiting, while the main destination was Australia. However, the Australian Government's strict policies resulted in refugees being held in Indonesia for many years. This research then examines how the protection of refugees in Pekanbaru City and Makassar City towards the granting of refugee rights granted by the Government and international organizations regarding the status of refugees so far. The author uses empirical/sociological legal research methods, which are conducted by observational research, by conducting surveys, and empirical or socio-legal approaches, namely through field observations, interviews, and literature studies. The results of this study found that Indonesia has respected the provisions of international law in protecting refugees in Indonesia. The handling of refugees in Indonesia For the most part, it has worked well in granting refugee rights under the provisions of international conventions on refugee status.