Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Presipitasi : Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan Intizar Holistik: Journal For Islamic Social Sciences Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Jurnal Bina Praja MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI Jurnal Organisasi Dan Manajemen Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan
Zulfia Hanum Alfi Syahr
Badan Riset Dan Inovasi Nasional
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 18 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan

 1 
CREATING A STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT FOR COURT ACCREDITATION Zulfia Hanum Alfi Syahr
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.39-62

Abstract

The improvement of court’s quality has been done through various efforts, one of them is an accreditation program. Before the implementation of internal accreditation policies, the courts under the Supreme Court had used ISO standards to maintain the service quality. Along with the development of judiciary innovations especially the dream toward the great judiciary, the Supreme Court has developed special accreditation standards for each judicial environment. General Court (Badilum) has implemented the Quality Assurance Accreditation (APM) programme in 7 assessment areas. Afterward, the Religious Courts (Badilag) in addition to 7 APM areas as in Badilum also applied 9 other assessment standards. Furthermore, the Military and Administration Agency (Badilmiltun) has 7 different accreditation assessment areas with Badilum and Badilag. The problem that will be examined is how to determine the ideal criteria for assessing court accreditation. Given that the ideal accreditation standard is not only improving the quality of court services but also being able to meet the needs and expectations of justice seekers, as indicated by the community satisfaction index. The court accreditation standard used today is the adoption of the International Framework of Court excellent (IFCE) and is adapted to the area of Bureaucratic Reform and the oversight function of the Supreme Court. The method of determining accreditation criteria is done by comparing court accreditation standards that have been used with the SERVQUAL model. The SERVQUAL model is an initial model that appears to measure service quality. The results of the study found that a number of court accreditation assessment standards has been represented the dimensions of service quality at SERVQUAL.
ACCESS TO POSBAKUM IN PANDEMIC TIMES AND THE DIGITAL ERA FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A MEANING OF SOCIAL JUSTICE FULFILLMENT Muhamad Zaky Albana; Zulfia Hanum Alfi Syahr
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11, No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.545-562

Abstract

Access to justice for the community is a mandate from the Constitution Article 28 Paragraph 1, which states that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection, fair legal certainty, and equal treatment before the law. The development of access to posbakum is a form of fulfilling social justice for the community following the mandate of the fifth principle of Pancasila. It is also stated in Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, which requires the court to assist justice seekers, try to overcome all obstacles, and achieve a simple trial, fast and low cost. Therefore, a legal aid post (Posbakum) is established at every court to help the underprivileged gain access to justice and equality before the law. So far, posbakum can only be accessed by going to court directly, so during the Covid-19 pandemic, people were hampered from getting these services. Especially for people who live in villages far from the courts, it is tough for them to access and obtain legal aid services from the courts. This paper examines how to develop posbakum so that village communities can more easily access it. It will also investigate the obstacles people in rural areas face in obtaining posbakum services. The method used is qualitative with data collection techniques through library research and interviews, coupled with a normative study of related regulations. This study shows that the existence of Posbakum, through partnerships with the village government, can provide better access to justice for village communities.
Land Problems and Legal Impact for Agrarian and Spatial Planning Officers Zulfia Hanum Alfi Syahr; Muh. Ridha Hakim; Nurrahman Aji Utomo; Yanuar Farida Wismayanti; Rahmat Husein Andri Ansyah; Novian Uticha Sally
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.123-146

Abstract

The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) is a government institution with the authority to carry out duties and functions of public services in agrarian, spatial planning and land. The development of land law issues in society has involved many officials from the Ministry of ATR/BPN as implementers of agrarian and land sector functions. The impact is the emergence of a sense of anxiety and worry felt by the Ministry of ATR/BPN officials when carrying out their duties. It is because if the land administration services provided by the Ministry of ATR/BPN are not thorough and careful, there are many gaps in legal violations, not only administrative and civil but also criminal. If the implementer of agrarian and land functions is a Civil Servant (PNS) and becomes a suspect in a legal case, he will be temporarily dismissed. He will not receive income from the Government Regulation on Civil Servant Management. Therefore, the problem that will be studied in this paper is the legal impact of land problems on the implementers of agrarian functions. This study explores the potential legal risks that implementers of agrarian functions can experience amidst the development of problematic land issues. The method used in this study is qualitative with a normative juridical approach. A normative juridical approach examines the legal rules and regulations that apply to answer legal problems. The results are that the administrative services carried out by the Ministry of ATR/BPN cannot be seen solely as part of administrative law. This is because the administrative services carried out can impact a person's legal ownership/civil status. Existing law enforcement instruments differentiate the judicial process for administrative, civil, and criminal violations.
Land Problems and Legal Impact for Agrarian and Spatial Planning Officers Syahr, Zulfia Hanum Alfi; Hakim, Muh. Ridha; Utomo, Nurrahman Aji; Wismayanti, Yanuar Farida; Ansyah, Rahmat Husein Andri; Sally, Novian Uticha
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 13 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.13.1.2024.123-146

Abstract

The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) is a government institution with the authority to carry out duties and functions of public services in agrarian, spatial planning and land. The development of land law issues in society has involved many officials from the Ministry of ATR/BPN as implementers of agrarian and land sector functions. The impact is the emergence of a sense of anxiety and worry felt by the Ministry of ATR/BPN officials when carrying out their duties. It is because if the land administration services provided by the Ministry of ATR/BPN are not thorough and careful, there are many gaps in legal violations, not only administrative and civil but also criminal. If the implementer of agrarian and land functions is a Civil Servant (PNS) and becomes a suspect in a legal case, he will be temporarily dismissed. He will not receive income from the Government Regulation on Civil Servant Management. Therefore, the problem that will be studied in this paper is the legal impact of land problems on the implementers of agrarian functions. This study explores the potential legal risks that implementers of agrarian functions can experience amidst the development of problematic land issues. The method used in this study is qualitative with a normative juridical approach. A normative juridical approach examines the legal rules and regulations that apply to answer legal problems. The results are that the administrative services carried out by the Ministry of ATR/BPN cannot be seen solely as part of administrative law. This is because the administrative services carried out can impact a person's legal ownership/civil status. Existing law enforcement instruments differentiate the judicial process for administrative, civil, and criminal violations.
CREATING A STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT FOR COURT ACCREDITATION Alfi Syahr, Zulfia Hanum
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 8 No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.8.1.2019.39-62

Abstract

The improvement of court’s quality has been done through various efforts, one of them is an accreditation program. Before the implementation of internal accreditation policies, the courts under the Supreme Court had used ISO standards to maintain the service quality. Along with the development of judiciary innovations especially the dream toward the great judiciary, the Supreme Court has developed special accreditation standards for each judicial environment. General Court (Badilum) has implemented the Quality Assurance Accreditation (APM) programme in 7 assessment areas. Afterward, the Religious Courts (Badilag) in addition to 7 APM areas as in Badilum also applied 9 other assessment standards. Furthermore, the Military and Administration Agency (Badilmiltun) has 7 different accreditation assessment areas with Badilum and Badilag. The problem that will be examined is how to determine the ideal criteria for assessing court accreditation. Given that the ideal accreditation standard is not only improving the quality of court services but also being able to meet the needs and expectations of justice seekers, as indicated by the community satisfaction index. The court accreditation standard used today is the adoption of the International Framework of Court excellent (IFCE) and is adapted to the area of Bureaucratic Reform and the oversight function of the Supreme Court. The method of determining accreditation criteria is done by comparing court accreditation standards that have been used with the SERVQUAL model. The SERVQUAL model is an initial model that appears to measure service quality. The results of the study found that a number of court accreditation assessment standards has been represented the dimensions of service quality at SERVQUAL.
ACCESS TO POSBAKUM IN PANDEMIC TIMES AND THE DIGITAL ERA FOR THE COMMUNITY AS A MEANING OF SOCIAL JUSTICE FULFILLMENT Albana, Muhamad Zaky; Alfi Syahr, Zulfia Hanum
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 11 No 3 (2022)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.545-562

Abstract

Access to justice for the community is a mandate from the Constitution Article 28 Paragraph 1, which states that everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection, fair legal certainty, and equal treatment before the law. The development of access to posbakum is a form of fulfilling social justice for the community following the mandate of the fifth principle of Pancasila. It is also stated in Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, which requires the court to assist justice seekers, try to overcome all obstacles, and achieve a simple trial, fast and low cost. Therefore, a legal aid post (Posbakum) is established at every court to help the underprivileged gain access to justice and equality before the law. So far, posbakum can only be accessed by going to court directly, so during the Covid-19 pandemic, people were hampered from getting these services. Especially for people who live in villages far from the courts, it is tough for them to access and obtain legal aid services from the courts. This paper examines how to develop posbakum so that village communities can more easily access it. It will also investigate the obstacles people in rural areas face in obtaining posbakum services. The method used is qualitative with data collection techniques through library research and interviews, coupled with a normative study of related regulations. This study shows that the existence of Posbakum, through partnerships with the village government, can provide better access to justice for village communities.
Co-Authors Adi Sumandiyar Agung Suharyanto Albana, Muhamad Zaky Ansyah, Rahmat Husein Andri Ari Purwanti Ari Purwanti Buyamin Buyamin Buyamin Husain, Muh. Najib I Gusti Ketut Agung Ulupui Juan Carlos M. Smith Muh. Ridha Hakim Muh. Ridha Hakim, Muh. Ridha Muhamad Zaky Albana Novian Uticha Sally Novian Uticha Sally Nurrahman Aji Utomo Nurrahman Aji Utomo, Nurrahman Aji Rahmat Husein Andri Ansyah Sally, Novian Uticha Syaifullah, Dian Hafit Tumbur Palti D. Hutapea Umma Farida Yanuar Farida Wismayanti Yanuar Farida Wismayanti, Yanuar Farida