Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam The Journal of Society and Media Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law
Indri Hadisiswati, Indri
IAIN Tulugagung
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK ATAS TANAH Hadisiswati, Indri
Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 2 No 1 (2014)
Publisher : IAIN Tulungagung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21274/ahkam.2014.2.1.118-146

Abstract

Giving ownership of land is intended to guarantee rights ofpeople legally. As an implementation of UUPA, the governmentregisters the ownership of land in Indonesia as stated in chapter19 UUPA. Technically, the basis for registering land is statedin Peraturan Pemerintah Number 10/1961 about land registerwhich is renewed in Peraturan Pemerintah No 24/1997.Kata kunci: Kepastian Hukum, Perlindungan Hukum, Hakatas Tanah
Regulating Arbitrary Divorce in Islamic Family Law: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah–Based Comparative Analysis of Muslim-Majority Legal Systems Fadhilah, Nur; Musonnif, Ahmad; Hadisiswati, Indri
Al-Hukama': The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Islamic Family Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.2.149-175

Abstract

This article examines how contemporary Islamic family law regulates arbitrary divorce and evaluates the extent to which such regulation operationalizes maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, particularly as conceptualized by Jamāl al-Dīn ʿAṭiyyah. Arbitrary divorce is understood as unilateral marital dissolution that occurs without adequate judicial oversight, substantive justification, or fair compensation, resulting in harm to women and children. The study asks how different legal systems constrain or reproduce arbitrary divorce and which regulatory model most effectively realizes substantive justice. Employing a qualitative and comparative method, the research analyzes statutory regulations, judicial structures, and doctrinal frameworks governing divorce in Indonesia, Iran, and Algeria as material objects of study. The findings demonstrate three distinct regulatory patterns. Indonesia adopts a procedural model that formally judicializes divorce but fails to prevent substantive injustice due to weak enforcement and partial protection of women’s financial and custodial rights. Iran reflects an administrative–doctrinal model that retains significant male prerogatives while introducing limited compensatory mechanisms. In contrast, Algeria represents a substantive maqāṣid-oriented model in which expanded judicial authority, mandatory reconciliation, and compensation for harm effectively constrain unilateral divorce and promote financial justice and child welfare. The study concludes that effective regulation of arbitrary divorce depends not on procedural formality alone but on the institutional capacity to translate ethical objectives into enforceable outcomes. This maqāṣid-based typology contributes to Islamic family law scholarship by offering a comparative framework for evaluating justice-oriented legal reform.
Wisdom in the Digital Era: Bridging Human Rights, Indonesian Cyber Law, and Progressive Fiqh Nur, Iffatin; Hadisiswati, Indri; Fajarwati, Hiba; Fithriy, Haniefa Nuruddienil; Muhammad Diyaulhaq Rais
The Journal of Society and Media Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Social Transformation in the Digital Media Ecosystem
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsm.v10n1.p315-340

Abstract

Digital technologies have reconfigured the landscape of public discourse, religious expression, and civic participation, generating both democratic opportunities and profound ethical challenges. While existing legal frameworks seek to regulate harmful online behavior, law alone proves insufficient to cultivate responsible digital conduct. This article argues that wisdom (ḥikmah) constitutes a critical, yet under- explored, ethical capacity for navigating the digital public sphere. Employing a normative–philosophical legal methodology, this study integrates three normative traditions: international human rights law, Indonesia’s Electronic Information and Transactions Law (EIT Law/UU ITE), and Progressive Fiqh grounded in maqāṣid al-sharī’ah, maṣlaḥah, and istiḥsān. Through conceptual and comparative analysis, the article demonstrates how wisdom functions as a mediating moral rationality that harmonizes freedom of expression with human dignity and social responsibility. The findings propose a model of “digital wisdom” that shifts governance from reactive legal control toward anticipatory ethical responsibility. This framework contributes to contemporary debates on digital governance, Islamic legal theory, and human rights by offering a culturally grounded yet universally resonant model of ethical digital citizenship. Future studies are encouraged to empirically examine how wisdom-based ethical frameworks can be institutionalized through digital literacy education, judicial practice, and religious discourse in diverse socio-legal contexts
Co-Authors Ahmad Musonnif Haniefa Nuruddienil Fithriy Hiba Fajarwati Iffatin Nur Muhammad Diyaulhaq Rais Nur Fadhilah