Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Konstitusi Constitutionale Jurnal Konstitusi
Iza Rumesten RS, Iza
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Dilema dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Mengenai Kewenangan Memutus Sengketa Pilkada Rumesten RS, Iza
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 4 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (617.58 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

MK decision to hand back an arbitrary in deciding disputed local election to the MA polemical and disagreement among legal experts. There are those who argue that it was the right decision, and there are also those who argue that the MK decision is wrong. Whatever the views of different opinions, the MK has concluded that it has binding (inkracht) and inviolable. The problem now is how best to anticipate the solution of other legal issues that arise as a result of the MK decision. Thus, in this study the formulation of the issues raised is how the legal effect of the decision of  the Constitutional MK No. 1-2/PUU-XII/2014 in the general election in Indonesia. The research method of this law is normative, primary legal materials are UUD NRI of 1945, Act No. 12 of 2008 on Regional Government, Act No. 8 of 2011 on the MK. The approach used in this study is the approach to statutory interpretation and approach. From the research it can be concluded that the MK decision to restore the authority to decide election disputes to the Supreme MA is right, because the local elections are local government regime (local elections). As a result of the decision, the government should establish a local election management bodies on a par with the Commission which may be called the local election commission (KPKD) but only institution based in the provincial and district/city, for an arbitrary level  of appeal submitted to the MA.
Fenomena Calon Tunggal dalam Pesta Demokrasi Rumesten RS, Iza
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.075 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1314

Abstract

Concurrent local elections to be held in December 2015, characterized by the dynamics of democracy and new political dynamics. Dynamics it is the birth of a single candidate in several areas that will carry out the election. It is on the one hand shows that the dynamics of democracy in the country increasingly show progress and our society is increasingly “literacy” and political savvy, but on the other hand it raises a new problem, namely whether the elections will be postponed or published decree. This happens because the legislators did not expect the birth   of a single candidate. This fact shows that the lawmakers have not been able to make laws that meet the philosophical and sociological aspects of that legislation was well received presence in the midst of society without conflict and live longer. Because it is common to occur in Indonesia legislation only whole corn.Issues to be addressed in this study is what legal remedies in the face of a single candidate and how the legal steps to prevent the birth of a single candidate in the elections. This study is a normative legal research, using qualitative juridical analysis. The result showed that the legal solutions that can be done to deal with a single candidate is  to 1). Exposes a single candidate with an empty tube, 2). Delay the election until   the election outright in 2017. 3). Published the decree. While the legal steps that  can be taken to prevent the birth of a single candidate is 1. Revise election laws, by adding specific chapter or article concerning a single candidate, 2. Increasing political education for the public and political party cadres and prepare the mature cadre in the party’s  internal.
Fenomena Calon Tunggal dalam Pesta Demokrasi Rumesten RS, Iza
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (399.075 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1314

Abstract

Concurrent local elections to be held in December 2015, characterized by the dynamics of democracy and new political dynamics. Dynamics it is the birth of a single candidate in several areas that will carry out the election. It is on the one hand shows that the dynamics of democracy in the country increasingly show progress and our society is increasingly “literacy” and political savvy, but on the other hand it raises a new problem, namely whether the elections will be postponed or published decree. This happens because the legislators did not expect the birth   of a single candidate. This fact shows that the lawmakers have not been able to make laws that meet the philosophical and sociological aspects of that legislation was well received presence in the midst of society without conflict and live longer. Because it is common to occur in Indonesia legislation only whole corn.Issues to be addressed in this study is what legal remedies in the face of a single candidate and how the legal steps to prevent the birth of a single candidate in the elections. This study is a normative legal research, using qualitative juridical analysis. The result showed that the legal solutions that can be done to deal with a single candidate is  to 1). Exposes a single candidate with an empty tube, 2). Delay the election until   the election outright in 2017. 3). Published the decree. While the legal steps that  can be taken to prevent the birth of a single candidate is 1. Revise election laws, by adding specific chapter or article concerning a single candidate, 2. Increasing political education for the public and political party cadres and prepare the mature cadre in the party’s  internal.
Discretionary Policy Responses in India and Indonesia Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges, Strategies, and the Imperative for Legal Reform Rumesten RS, Iza; Muntaqo, Firman; Panjaitan, Saut Parulian; Bugaeva, Anna Sergeevna; Towadi, Mellisa
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol 8 No 2 (2023): Contemporary Issues on Law, Development, and Justice: Indonesian Context and Beyo
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v8i2.70143

Abstract

This study endeavors to conduct a meticulous analysis and comparison of the discretionary policy frameworks employed by India and Indonesia in response to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The research delineates its focus into two primary dimensions: firstly, an examination of the structure and application of discretionary policies formulated by the central governments of both nations; secondly, an in-depth exploration of the challenges and strategic considerations in the local-level implementation of these policies, aligned with the dynamic nature of the pandemic. Employing a rigorous research methodology, this study entails the systematic analysis of pertinent legal and policy documents, a comprehensive review of existing literature, and a nuanced conceptual and philosophical interpretation of discretionary policies in the context of pandemic management. The findings of this research underscore the distinctive approaches undertaken by India and Indonesia in the implementation of discretionary policies. India adopts a more centralized model, whereas Indonesia pursues a decentralized trajectory. Both nations encounter challenges in inter-governmental coordination, with India grappling with the harmonization of central and state policies, and Indonesia contending with disparities between central and local governance. Furthermore, the research underscores the imperative for both countries to reassess and develop legislative frameworks that are adaptive and dynamic, harmonizing legal rigidity with the requisite flexibility to effectively respond to the rapidly evolving conditions of the pandemic. Crucially, the research emphasizes the necessity for enhanced transparency and accountability within the realm of discretionary policy. Both countries are urged to fortify these elements to cultivate public trust and ensure the efficacious and equitable implementation of policies during the ongoing public health crisis.
Towards A Juristocratic State: A Critical Analysis Of The Constitutional Court Decision No 90/Puu-Xxi/2023 Concerning The Age Limits Of Vice Presidential Candidates Dian Pratama, Alip; Flambonita, Suci; Rumesten RS, Iza; Rasyid, Muhamad; Yunithia Putri, Taufani
Constitutionale Vol 5 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v5i2.3515

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Concerning the Age Limit for Vice Presidential Candidates in the 2024 Presidential Election has caused much controversy, both politically and legally. This decision has profound implications for Indonesia’ political configuration, as it grants constitutional legitimacy to Gibran Rakabuming Raka, enabling him to run as a candidate for vice president of the Republic of Indonesia in the 2024 General Election. In the context of the legal debate, several problems have emerged, including the impact of this decision on the quality of democracy in Indonesia. One key concern is whether this decision is the initial gateway for Indonesia to enter a system called 'juristocracy'. This term refers to a situation where the Constitutional Court Decision justifies the practice of 'negative legislation', where the legislative function is constitutionally only given to the President and the DPR, but the Constitutional Court, through its 'final and binding' decision power, makes this a loophole that potentially damage democracy. This research is focused on examining the decision based on the two fundamental problems outlined above, using a library research method based on normative research, with a conceptual approach as its foundation. The analysis employs the theory of the rule of law to critically assess whether the decision has significant positive or negative implications for the sustainability of democracy and the existence of the rule of law in Indonesia in the future.
Co-Authors Bugaeva, Anna Sergeevna Dian Pratama, Alip Firman Muntaqo Flambonita, Suci Mellisa Towadi Panjaitan, Saut Parulian Rasyid, Muhamad Yunithia Putri, Taufani