Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.513
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal USU LAW JOURNAL Ensiklopedia Education Review Ilmu Hukum Prima Jurnal Darma Agung JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Sukses M. P. Siburian, Sukses M. P.
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Prima Indonesia
Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : USU LAW JOURNAL

 1 
HAK DAN KEWAJIBAN KURATOR PASCA PUTUSAN PEMBATALAN PAILIT PADA TINGKAT KASASI OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG (STUDI KASUS KEPAILITAN PT. TELKOMSEL VS PT. PRIMA JAYA INFORMATIKA) Sukses M. P. Siburian; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Utary Maharany Barus; Jelly Leviza
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (549.239 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Ruling of the Supreme Court on the case of PT. Telkomsel, the Supreme Court does not specify the compensation for the curator, whereas it has stipulated by the panel of judges of the Supreme Court. The objective of the research was to answer the problems about the right and obligation of a curator, the regulation on the compensation for a curator, and the right and obligation of a curator after the Ruling on the cancelation of bankruptcy in the cassation level by the Supreme Court on the case of PT. Telkomsel vs. PT. Prima Jaya Informatika was stipulated. Curator’s task is to manage and/or to settle bankruptcy property, while his right is to get compensation for his service through a judge’s verdict. According to UUKPKPU, the compensation for a curator’s service is charged to the petitioner and the debtor of the bankruptcy; but, according to Kepmen No. M.09-HT.05.10/1998, it is charged to a debtor. According to Permenkumham No. 1/2013, it is charged to the petitioner of the bankruptcy.  After the ruling on the cancellation of bankruptcy in the cassation level on the case of PT. Telkomsel is specified, the obligation of the curator was to announce the ruling in the cassation in the news of the Republic of Indonesia, at least in two daily newspapers. Under the law, a curator’s right should be specified in a judge’s verdict; but, in reality it is not stipulated in the Supreme Court’s Ruling. Keywords: Right, Obligation, Curator, Bankruptcy
Co-Authors Agus Irawan Agus Irawan darmawan, Eliana Eka Suryani Giawa Herman Brahmana, Herman Iin Hotprinauli Purba Jelly Leviza Kuara, Glenessa Lazio Afriando Bukit Mazmur Septian Rumapea Muhammad Hendra Pangaribuan, Prengky Bachtiar Hasudungan Rusmita Sari Sagala, Juliana Priska Dewi Sembiring, Hellen Br Sunarmi, Sunarmi Sunjoyo, Alexandra Martha Santoso Turnip, Johannes Mangapul Utary Maharany Barus