Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 56/Puu-Xvii/2019 Bagi Calon Kepala Daerah Berstatus Mantan Terpidana Korupsi Dipilih Kembali dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2020 Caka Adidarma; Sunny ummul Firdaus
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 6, No 2: MEI-AGUSTUS
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v6i2.57540

Abstract

This legal research aims to find out the implementation of the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 56/PUU-XVII/2019 for regional head candidates, especially former convicted of corruption who will follow back in the regional head elections in 2020 and the legal consequences of the ruling. This legal research uses normative or doctrinal legal research methods that are prescriptive. The research approach the authors use is the legal approach and the case approach. The data types used are primary and secondary data. Primary data is obtained from legislation while secondary data is obtained through literature studies, namely books, journals, and scientific articles.The implementation of constitutional court decision No. 56/PUU-XVII/2019 granted the application related to the conditions for candidates for regional heads, especially former corruption convicts who are required to wait for a period of 5 years after serving a prison term based on a court ruling with permanent legal force. In contesting the simultaneous elections in 2020 the verdict has not been able to be implemented maximally because there are several candidates for regional heads of former corruption convicts who do not comply with the conditions of candidacy can run in the 2020 election. Among others in North Nias Regency, South Lampung Regency, Dompu Regency, Boven Digoel Regency, and Bengkulu Province. Among these areas, the candidate for regional head is a former corruption convict who won the contestation of elections is Boven Digoel Regency. The decision of MK No. 56/PUU-XVII/2019 resulted in the change of PKPU No. 9 of 2020 article 4 paragraph (1) letter g about for ex-convicts who have completed their sentence must honestly or openly present to the public regarding their identity background as former convicted of corruption. As a result of PKPU No.9 of 2020, the arrangement of candidates who are inmates raises special conditions for the nomination of elections in 2020 who must wait for a five-year time lag period after serving their criminal sentences.
Urgensi Pembatasan Masa Jabatan Anggota Legislatif dalam Upaya Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan Haryo Adhi Wijoyo; Sunny Ummul Firdaus
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 6, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v6i1.48223

Abstract

This research analyzes the urgency of limiting the term of office of legislative members in an effort to prevent abuse of power. This research is a prescriptive normative legal research to analyze the urgency of limiting the term of office of legislative members and preventing abuse of power by legislators. This research uses primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of legal books, legal journals and other literature. Data collection was carried out through library research. In writing this law, the author uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the laws and regulations in Indonesia do not explicitly regulate the limitation of the term of office of legislative members, and the urgency of limiting the term of office of legislative members is needed in order to avoid abuse of power and as a better regeneration of leaders.
Disfungsi Asas Kecermatan Dalam Penerbitan Sertifikat Hak Milik Yang Disebabkan Oleh Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Anila Robbani; Sunny Ummul Firdaus; Sapto Hermawan
Jurnal QOSIM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/jq.v4i3.9272

Abstract

Penerbitan Sertifikat Hak Milik (SHM) merupakan instrumen penting dalam sistem pendaftaran tanah untuk mewujudkan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak atas tanah. Namun, dalam praktiknya masih ditemukan penerbitan SHM yang tidak memenuhi asas kecermatan sehingga menimbulkan cacat administrasi dan sengketa pertanahan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum disfungsi asas kecermatan terhadap keabsahan SHM yang timbul dalam sengketa perbuatan melawan hukum serta menganalisis tanggung jawab hukum Kantor Pertanahan atas penerbitan SHM yang tidak memenuhi asas kecermatan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri atas bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, pertama, disfungsi asas kecermatan dalam penerbitan SHM berimplikasi pada cacat substansi atau legalitas materiil sertifikat sebagai KTUN, sehingga sertifikat yang diterbitkan berdasarkan data yang tidak akurat dan bertentangan dengan AUPB dapat dibatalkan. Kedua, Kantor Pertanahan memiliki tanggung jawab hukum yang diwujudkan melalui perbaikan data pertanahan, mediasi, pembatalan sertifikat, serta bentuk pertanggungjawaban lainnya sesuai ketentuan hukum administrasi dan hukum perdata guna memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pihak yang dirugikan. Dengan demikian, penerapan asas kecermatan merupakan syarat fundamental untuk menjamin keabsahan sertifikat, kepastian hukum, dan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak atas tanah.
Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Presidential Threshold (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tahun 2017 -2022) Ivan Ihza Shobari Hasibuan; Sunny Ummul Firdaus
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 6, No 3: SEPTEMBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v6i3.63202

Abstract

This research aims to determine and analyze the decision of the Constitutional Court in reviewing chapter 222 Undang-Undang.Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum . This research is doctrinal or normative legal research with an analytical-descriptive character. The material collection technique performed by the author is a literature study by collecting legal material consisting of primary legal material and secondary legal material. The legal materials were analyzed using the deductive method. Formally, the Constitutional Court considers political parties and/or political party coalitions directly affected by the threshold requirements for the nomination of the President and Vice-President in the general election to be entitled to request a review of Article 222 of this Electoral Code. Apart from that, the constitutional court essentially takes the view in its decision that the presidential threshold is a means and a way to strengthen the presidential system in Indonesia. On the other hand, the setting of the presidential difficult for some political parties to accept because it restricts the nomination of candidates for president and vice president. In addition, many parties have filed complaints with the Constitutional Court, both individuals and party representatives, demanding the introduction of a threshold that causes violations of the personal political rights of citizens and political parties.
Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-XX/2022 Terhadap Pengampuan Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas Mental Haliza Azzahra; Sunny Ummul Firdaus; Achmad Achmad
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 9, No 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v9i3.91142

Abstract

This legal research aims to examine and analyze the Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-XX/2022 related to the judicial review of Article 433 of the Civil Code about Guardianship. The research method used is a normative or doctrinal legal research method with a case approach. The legal material collection technique used is library research. This research uses qualitative analysis techniques, which are rooted in the major premise and then propose the minor premise. Based on this research, the results obtained were that judges used historical, grammatical and systematic interpretation methods in their considerations. The judge partially granted the request and declared that Article 433 of the Civil Code was conditionally unconstitutional. In the aspect of legal protection for people with mental disabilities, the indicator used in this research is Article 9 of Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities. Of the nine indicators in this article, it was found that the continued existence of the guardianship system means that the rights stated in Article 9 of the Law on Persons with Disabilities cannot all be fulfilled, so that legal protection for people with mental disabilities is not yet optimal.
TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITAS DALAM TATA KELOLA BUMDES (STUDI KASUS BUMDES SEJAHTERA CEMANI) Pratisto Ilham Pranoto; Sunny Ummul Firdaus
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v8i2.87674

Abstract

Badan Usaha Milik Desa atau BUMDes adalah badan usaha yang dibentuk Pemerintah Desa bersama masyarakat desa untuk memberdayakan ekonomi desa dan mewujudkan kesejahteraan masyarakat desa. Transparansi dan akuntabilitas merupakan bagian yang fundamental dalam tata kelola BUMDes yang baik. Tujuan dari tulisan ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam tata kelola BUMDes di BUMDes Sejahtera Desa Cemani di Sukoharjo. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum empiris. Bahan hukum terdiri dari data primer berupa wawancara dan data sekunder berupa studi kepustakaan. Data kemudian diolah dengan metode analisis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, pertama mengenai transparansi, kejelasan dan kelengkapan informasi, dan keterbukaan proses telah berjalan dengan baik. Meski demikian, kesediaan aksesibilitas dokumen dan kerangka regulasi yang menjamin transparansi belum dijalankan dengan baik dalam tata kelola BUMDes Cemani. Kedua mengenai akuntabilitas, dalam akuntabilitas proses, akuntabilitas program, dan akuntabilitas kebijakan telah dijalankan dengan baik di BUMDes Cemani. Akuntabilitas kejujuran dan akuntabilitas hukum juga telah terlaksana meski belum sempurna, khususnya dalam aspek akuntabilitas hukum.
ANALISIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 35/PUU-X/2012 DALAM MEMBERIKAN KEDUDUKAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP HUTAN ADAT Ragil Meiliana Nur Fitri; Sunny Ummul Firdaus
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 8, No 1 (2024): April
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v8i1.75299

Abstract

This study describes and examines the problem regarding the customary forest was released from its status as a national forest ; as well as how is the analysis and impact after the Constitutional Court decision number 35/PUU-X/2012 in giving position and protection of customary forests. This research uses a type of doctrinal (normative) research that is prescriptive. Types and sources of legal materials include primary and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is library research. Furthermore, the legal material analysis technique used with the syllogism method uses a deductive mindset. The results of the study show that the Constitutional Court Decision Number 35/PUU-X/2012 has changed the status of customary forest from state forest to private forest to provide legal certainty and justice for customary law communities as subjects who inhabit customary forest areas. Furthermore, after the decision was made, it had an impact on the central government to implement it through the Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. 32 of 2015 concerning Private Forests, and the Regional Government implements it through the preparation of Regional Regulations related to the recognition of the existence of Customary Forests and Customary Law Communities. However, the implementation has not run optimally, as evidenced by the existence of several cases of disputes over customary forests in Indonesia. Penelitian ini mendiskripsikan dan mengkaji permasalahan, pertama mengapa hutan adat dilepaskan statusnya sebagai hutan negara oleh Kedua, bagaimana analisis serta dampak pasca adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 dalam memberikan kedudukan dan perlindungan terhadap hutan adat. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian doktrinal (normatif) bersifat preskriptif. Jenis dan bahan sumber bahan hukum meliputi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan. Selanjutnya Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan dengan metode silogisme menggunakan pola pikir deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 telah merubah status hutan adat dari hutan negara menjadi hutan hak untuk memberikan kepastian dan keadilan hukum bagi masyarakat hukum adat sebagai subjek yang mendiami kawasan hutan adat. Selanjutnya pasca ada putusan tersebut membawa dampak bagi pemerintah pusat untuk mengimplementasikannya melalui Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan No. 32 tahun 2015 tentang Hutan Hak, dan Pemerintah Daerah mengimplementasikan melalui penyusunan Peraturan Daerah terkait dengan pengakuan keberadaan Hutan Adat dan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Namun dalam implementasinya belum berjalan dengan maksimal, dibuktikan dengan masih adanya beberapa kasus sengketan hutan adat di Indonesia. 
PERAN KANTOR WILAYAH KEMENTERIAN HUKUM DAN HAM DALAM KEWENANGAN EXECUTIVE PREVIEW PERATURAN DAERAH DAN PERATURAN KEPALA DAERAH Raffel Pradityo Prabowo; Sunny Ummul Firdaus
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 8, No 3 (2024): Desember
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v8i3.88506

Abstract

This research focuses on the executive preview authority carried out by the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (Kanwil Kemenkumham) in the process of forming Regional Regulations (Perda/Perkada). The objectives of this study are, firstly, to understand the implementation of the executive preview authority in Perda/Perkada. Secondly, to identify the obstacles encountered in its implementation process. The research method employed is empirical legal research, using the Sociology of Law approach and qualitative in nature. Legal materials were collected by conducting field research at the Kanwil Kemenkumham Central Java and studying literature analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study indicate that: Firstly, the implementation of the executive preview authority conducted at the Kanwil Kemenkumham Central Java goes through these stages: submission of harmonization requests, administrative examination, conceptual analysis, harmonization meeting, preparation of harmonization minutes, approval endorsement, submission of harmonization completion letters. However, this process has not been ideally executed as not all regions conduct executive previews despite the Legal Regulations stating it is mandatory, yet there are no sanctions when regions fail to follow the process. Secondly, obstacles found in the implementation of the executive preview include the lack of Human Resources in Regulation Drafting, the weakness of executive preview authority in legal regulations, and the lack of regional understanding of the administrative document requirements that should be fulfilled before submitting harmonization requests.