Muhamad Sayuti Hassan
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

A Comparison Between Indonesian and Malaysian Anti-Corruption Laws Tinuk Dwi Cahyani; Muhamad Helmi Md Said; Muhamad Sayuti Hassan
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 10, No 2 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Corruption is quite a complicated problem. It has made many countries, including Indonesia, to ratify the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC). It is an effort to prevent and to eradicate corruption with international cooperation. Unfortunately, several studies have revealed that Indonesia is experiencing a legal vacuum on corruption because Indonesia only adopts a few points of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption in written regulations. The legal vacuum causes difficulties in the resolution of corruption cases. Compared to other countries, the Indonesia Corruption Perceptions Index is still quite high. It leads to some questions that are addressed in this study. First, why does Indonesia not adopt all articles of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption? Second, how are corruption cases in Indonesia managed after the ratification? Third, how is the comparison of the law to the Malaysia law? To answer the questions, this study used a normative method. It employed the analysis of primary and secondary data assisted using the nVivo 12 application. The study revealed that Indonesia cannot ratify all articles because Indonesia needs some adjustments to meet the required proportions before the new laws are passed. After the ratification, Indonesia seems to have better regulations and adequate existing conditions. Lastly, laws or regulations in Malaysia are more dynamic than Indonesia.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n2.a7 
Implementation of the Bullying Box and Establishment of Prevention Team to Address Bullying Cases at SMA Islam Al-Azhar 30 Salatiga Cahya Wulandari; Sukadari Sukadari; Winarsih Winarsih; Chanidia Ari Rahmayani; Muhamad Sayuti Hassan; Agung Aditya
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): (January-June 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v8i1.26400

Abstract

Bullying in Indonesia is increasingly on the rise, especially among children and teenagers, and most of it occurs in school environments. Bullying that occurs to a student will affect their psychological and social development and raise concerns about their health in the future. The problem faced by the students of SMA Islam Al-Azhar 30 Salatiga is the prevalence of bullying experienced by students, perpetrated by their own peers, both individually and in groups. This is due to the students' lack of knowledge, which stems from insufficient attention and education about bullying provided by parents and the school. The service team help solve the Partner's problem by creating a bullying box as a place for students to report bullying behavior they have experienced, witnessed, or heard, and by forming a bullying prevention and resolution team or violence prevention team. The purpose of this activity is to help prevent and resolve bullying among students at SMA Islam Al-Azhar 30 Salatiga.
The Constitutional Design of Weak Bicameralism: Re-evaluating the Legislative Powers of Indonesia's Regional Representative Council A Rosyid Al Atok; Muhamad Sayuti Hassan; Sudirman Sudirman; Didik Sukriono
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2026): August (On Progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v8i2.34487

Abstract

The legislative function constitutes a fundamental pillar of parliament, operating in tandem with the oversight and budgetary functions. The establishment of the DPD within the Indonesian system was originally intended to construct a bicameral system that ensures checks and balances while accommodating regional interests. However, the current constitutional design reflects a flawed mechanism, culminating in a system of weak bicameralism that marginalizes the DPD's institutional role and renders it subordinate to the DPR. Although previous literature has extensively highlighted the DPD's limited authority, prior scholarship remains largely descriptive, focusing on normative reform proposals without adequately addressing the theoretical implications of this asymmetric power distribution. To bridge this research gap, this article employs a normative approach to re-evaluate the DPD's legislative authority, thereby advancing the existing discourse on constitutional design and institutional reform. The findings indicate that the existing anomaly in power distribution distorts the genuine mechanism of mutual control. As its principal theoretical contribution, this study reconceptualizes the parameters of effective asymmetric bicameralism by asserting that genuine territorial representation necessitates a substantive expansion of legislative powers, encompassing independent initiative rights, comprehensive deliberative participation, and decisive final views. This theoretical framework enriches comparative constitutional literature by demonstrating how reconfiguring asymmetric powers is essential to transforming constitutional anomalies into a balanced, effective, and accountable parliamentary system.