Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.654
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty Jurnal Akta Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review Lampung Journal of International Law (LaJIL) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Yuridika Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum
Dinda Keumala
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 40 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search
Journal : amicus curiae

 1 
TUMPANG TINDIH SERTIPIKAT DI KELURAHAN PEGADUNGAN, KOTA ADMINISTRASI JAKARTA BARAT: Overlapping Certificates in Pegadungan Village, West Jakarta Administrative City Desty Rachmawaty; Dinda Keumala
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19540

Abstract

Overlapping certificates are the issuance of two or more certificates describing the same parcel of land. The formulation of the problem in this research is whether the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan in the name of Yahya H. Ahmad above Building Rights Title Certificate Number 15596/Pegadungan in the name of PT Cakradigdaya Lokaraya is valid according to the provisions of National Land Law. Normative juridical research type with analytical descriptive research nature and the type of data used is secondary data obtained from the literature study. Data analysis using qualitative method and deductive inference. Conclusion, based on the Certificate of Pegadungan Village Head, the girik used by Yahya H. Ahmad in the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan is not registered in Pegadungan Village, so the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan is not in accordance with the provisions of National Land Law, namely the Explanation of Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.
KEABSAHAN KUITANSI SEBAGAI BUKTI JUAL BELI TANAH MENURUT HUKUM TANAH NASIONAL : Validity of Receipt As Proof of Land Sale According To the National Land Law Elvia Qonitah Maliha; Dinda Keumala
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19600

Abstract

According to the National Land Law, the act of buying and selling land must meet the characteristics of clear, cash-based, and genuine transactions. The issue addressed in this research is the validity of land transactions conducted with receipt evidence, as per the National Land Law and the District Court Decision Number 191/Pdt.G/2021/PN Smg, and how to register the transfer of rights when the seller's whereabouts are unknown, also related to the aforementioned court decision. This study adopts a normative research approach with descriptive analysis. Secondary data obtained from literature studies are utilized, complemented by primary data to support the arguments. The research employs a qualitative analysis method, and conclusions are drawn using the deductive approach. It should be noted that a land transaction conducted solely with a receipt as evidence, without a Sale and Purchase Deed executed before a Land Deed Making Official, cannot be deemed valid according to the National Land Law, as it fails to fulfill the clear transaction nature and the formal requirements of buying and selling.
TUMPANG TINDIH SERTIPIKAT DI KELURAHAN PEGADUNGAN, KOTA ADMINISTRASI JAKARTA BARAT: Overlapping Certificates in Pegadungan Village, West Jakarta Administrative City Rachmawaty, Desty; Keumala, Dinda
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19540

Abstract

Overlapping certificates are the issuance of two or more certificates describing the same parcel of land. The formulation of the problem in this research is whether the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan in the name of Yahya H. Ahmad above Building Rights Title Certificate Number 15596/Pegadungan in the name of PT Cakradigdaya Lokaraya is valid according to the provisions of National Land Law. Normative juridical research type with analytical descriptive research nature and the type of data used is secondary data obtained from the literature study. Data analysis using qualitative method and deductive inference. Conclusion, based on the Certificate of Pegadungan Village Head, the girik used by Yahya H. Ahmad in the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan is not registered in Pegadungan Village, so the issuance of Title Certificate Number 9567/Pegadungan is not in accordance with the provisions of National Land Law, namely the Explanation of Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.
KEABSAHAN KUITANSI SEBAGAI BUKTI JUAL BELI TANAH MENURUT HUKUM TANAH NASIONAL : Validity of Receipt As Proof of Land Sale According To the National Land Law Maliha, Elvia Qonitah; Keumala, Dinda
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19600

Abstract

According to the National Land Law, the act of buying and selling land must meet the characteristics of clear, cash-based, and genuine transactions. The issue addressed in this research is the validity of land transactions conducted with receipt evidence, as per the National Land Law and the District Court Decision Number 191/Pdt.G/2021/PN Smg, and how to register the transfer of rights when the seller's whereabouts are unknown, also related to the aforementioned court decision. This study adopts a normative research approach with descriptive analysis. Secondary data obtained from literature studies are utilized, complemented by primary data to support the arguments. The research employs a qualitative analysis method, and conclusions are drawn using the deductive approach. It should be noted that a land transaction conducted solely with a receipt as evidence, without a Sale and Purchase Deed executed before a Land Deed Making Official, cannot be deemed valid according to the National Land Law, as it fails to fulfill the clear transaction nature and the formal requirements of buying and selling.
PERBANDINGAN HUKUM JUAL BELI TANAH DI INDONESIA DAN LAOS: Comparison Of Land Sale And Purchase Laws In Indonesian And Laos Putri, Febby Permata; Keumala, Dinda
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/1gk53714

Abstract

Differences in land buying and selling laws in Indonesia and Laos are due to different conceptions adopted by each country. The formulation of the problem in this study is how are the similarities and differences in the laws of buying and selling land in Indonesia and Laos. The conclusion of this study is the similarity, regarding the arrangement of land rights, where foreign nationals cannot buy land to be controlled permanently; its land registration system; the function of the deed of sale and purchase of land; and land sale and purchase registration function. In addition to similarities, there are also differences regarding the regulations/legal basis for buying and selling land; definition of buying and selling land; implementation of land sale and purchase; making deed of sale and purchase of land; land sale and purchase registration; or at the time of the transfer of rights.
PERMASALAHAN PENERBITAN SERTIPIKAT BERDASARKAN AKTA JUAL BELI DI KECAMATAN CILINCING, JAKARTA UTARA: Problems Of Issuing Certificates Based On Deeds Of Sale And Purchase In Cilincing District, North Jakarta Agung Daniel Panogari Simanjuntak; Dinda Keumala
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i2.22998

Abstract

The transfer of rights through sale and purchase must be evidenced by a Sale and Purchase Deed made by the Land Deed Official (PPAT), which serves as proof of the transfer of rights from the seller to the buyer and for land registration purposes. The identification of the problem in this research is the validity of five Sale and Purchase Deeds made before Slamet Musyianto, S.H., PPAT in North Jakarta Administration City and whether the issuance of five certificates in the name of Aspah Supriadi derived from those deeds in the PTSL program in Cilincing District by the Land Office of North Jakarta Administration City complies with the National Land Law provisions. This research uses a normative type with a descriptive nature. Secondary data was collected through literature study. Analysis was conducted qualitatively with conclusions drawn deductively. Based on the research results and conclusions, it is concluded that the Sale and Purchase Deeds made before the PPAT are invalid because they do not meet the requirements of land sale and purchase under the National Land Law and the criteria for making Sale and Purchase Deeds. Furthermore, the issuance of certificates under the PTSL program does not comply with applicable regulatory provisions.
PERMASALAHAN PENERBITAN AKTA JUAL BELI DALAM KASUS NIRINA ZUBIR: The Problem Of Issuing A Deed Of Sale And Purchase In The Case Of Nirina Zubir Nabil Listiawan; Dinda Keumala
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24993

Abstract

The legal act of transferring land rights through buying and selling according to Article 37 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 must have a deed made by the Land Deed Making Officer as proof that there has been a transfer of land rights from the seller to the buyer and the deed is needed for land registration. The problems discussed by researchers in this research are: what is the validity of the 6 (six) land sale and purchase deeds made in the presence of Ina Rosaina, S.H. and Erwin Riduan, S.Sos, S.H., M.Kn, Official Land Deed Maker in West Jakarta and what is the legal protection for the actual land owner for the land sale and purchase deed made in the presence of Ina Rosaina, S.H. and Erwin Riduan, S.Sos, S.H., M.Kn, Land Deed Making Officer in West Jakarta. The type of research used is normative research, the nature of the research is descriptive, the data used is qualitative analysis, the method of drawing conclusions used is deductive logic. The 6 (six) land sale and purchase deeds that were made were invalid, because they did not fulfill the characteristics of a sale and purchase according to the National Land Law and did not meet the requirements for making a land sale and purchase deed. The actual legal protection of land owners can be carried out in the form of repressive legal protection.
PENUKARAN OBYEK JAMINAN DALAM PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN: STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 901/PDT.G/2023/PN.JKT.SEL Lubis, Salma Salsabila; Keumala, Dinda
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/x4374v24

Abstract

Dalam praktik pemberian kredit, jaminan memiliki peranan penting sebagai perlindungan bagi kreditur dalam menghadapi risiko wanprestasi debitur. Jaminan kebendaan yang umum digunakan adalah Hak Tanggungan. Penelitian ini menganalisis keabsahan penukaran obyek jaminan dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi Hak Tanggungan berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 901/Pdt.G/2023/PN.JKT.SEL. Rumusan masalahnya adalah apakah penukaran obyek jaminan tersebut diperbolehkan menurut ketentuan UUHT. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis, menggunakan data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan, buku, jurnal, dan putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hak Tanggungan bersifat accessoir terhadap perjanjian pokoknya, tetap melekat pada obyek jaminan meskipun telah berpindah tangan, selama belum dihapus atau diganti sesuai ketentuan. Dalam perkara ini, rencana penukaran obyek jaminan batal karena debitur tidak memenuhi syarat yang diberikan dari kreditur, sehingga eksekusi tetap dapat dilakukan. Meskipun UUHT tidak mengatur secara eksplisit penukaran obyek jaminan, hal tersebut diperbolehkan sepanjang memenuhi syarat sah perjanjian menurut Pasal 1320 dan 1338 KUH Perdata.
PEMBUATAN SURAT KUASA MENJUAL AGUNAN DALAM PEMBERIAN KREDIT DI BPR BKK JATENG Sabrina, Annisa; Keumala, Dinda
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v3i1.25674

Abstract

Sistem keuangan khususnya perbankan, memegang peran penting dalam perekonomian Indonesia dengan fungsi sebagai perantara antara pihak yang kelebihan dana dengan pihak yang membutuhkan dana, melalui pemberian kredit yang dituangkan dalam perjanjian kredit sesuai syarat sah perjanjian dalam Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata. Perkembangan hukum dalam Nieuw Burgerlijk Wetboek (NBW), menambahkan alasan pembatalan perjanjian berupa penyalahgunaan keadaan. Dalam praktiknya, bank sering meminta nasabah menandatangani Surat Kuasa Menjual Agunan untuk memudahkan eksekusi jaminan jika terjadi wanprestasi, namun penandatanganan SKMA bersamaan dengan perjanjian kredit menimbulkan kontroversi hukum dan perlindungan bagi debitur seperti yang terjadi dalam Putusan Nomor 19/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Rbg. Rumusan masalah dari tulisan ini adalah Bagaimanakah kedudukan hukum terhadap Surat Kuasa Menjual Agunan dalam Putusan Nomor 19/Pdt.G.S/2023/PN Rbg. Tipe penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan sifat deskriptif yang bersumber pada data sekunder, dengan pengumpulan data secara studi dokumen dan analisis data dengan kuantitatif serta pengambilan kesimpulan dengan metode deduktif. Hasil pembahasan ini adalah bahwa kedudukan Surat Kuasa Menjual Agunan dapat diajukan pembatalan hukum karena tidak memenuhi syarat subjektif dengan terjadinya cacat kehendak dan/atau berakibat batal demi hukum karena tidak memenuhi syarat objektif yaitu suatu sebab yang halal.
Co-Authors Abdill Hannandi Abdill Hannandi Adi Wiratno, Adi Agung Daniel Panogari Simanjuntak Amani, Aghna Zarra Arranchado, Jimi Rambo Az, M. Fariduddin Bakri, Khairani Balqies, Izzah Bayuaji, Anandayu Pavita Desty Rachmawaty Dhea Nadhifa Vrily Pontoh Dian Purnamasari Edgar Joseph Elvia Qonitah Maliha Fauzia Rahmitha Sari I Gede Yudi Arsawan Ignatius Pradipa Probondaru Intan Monika Kalisha Athallah Dyaniputri Khairani Bakri Lubis, Salma Salsabila Maliha, Elvia Qonitah Mega Ayu Putri Lestari Nabil Listiawan Namira Muna Salsabila Nursantih, Nadia Pahlevi, Ahmad Gozzy Putri, Febby Permata Rachmawaty, Desty Rahmat, Nur Ezan Rurrie Putri Mutiara Sari Sabirin, Ahmad Sabrina, Annisa Setiawati, Anda setiyono Setiyono Setiyono Setiyono Setiyono Sugeng Supartono Supartono, Sugeng Suzaini, Syaqila Binte Tantri Benaz Cindy Siregar Yuandha Kurnia Setiawan