Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Novelty Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran
Rahmat, Nur Ezan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan Rumah Tinggal Anak Sebagai Objek Gugatan Harta Bersama dalam Hukum Islam: Perspektif Kepentingan Terbaik Budi, Kukuh Pramono; Anand, Ghansham; Septiningrum, Shintya Yulfa; Rahmat, Nur Ezan; Nugraha, Xavier
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 23 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v23i2.12278

Abstract

Children hold a very important role in the development of a country. However, children are generally vulnerable; hence, protecting and ensuring children's rights must be a priority. One example of a condition where children’s rights are put at risk is when a child's residence becomes the object of a joint property lawsuit. In this case, the principle of the best interests of the child needs to be the main consideration in all matters of decision. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the best interests of the child principle in Islamic law and analyze the formulation of the judge's decision regarding the position of the child's residence, which is the object of a joint property lawsuit. This research is normative legal research, using primary and secondary legal materials. The result of this research shows that the principle of the best interests of the child initiated at the Convention on the Rights of the Child has become an important consideration in various laws and regulations in Indonesia, including the Compilation of Islamic Law to the Supreme Court Circular Letter (Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung, SEMA). As an important principle to be applied in the joint property lawsuit, this study provides three views of the judge's decision formulation, namely: 1) The lawsuit is admissible as there is no explicit norm; 2) It is inadmissible as it is waiting for the child to enter adult age; and 3) It is admissible; however, the distribution is postponed till the child enters adult age. Through this study, the author agreed that the lawsuit is admissible by postponing the distribution until the child reaches adulthood. However, there needs to be some refinement regarding the position of SEMA and the clarity of adult age.
The establishment of LAPS SJK in the trajectory of history viewed from the politics of Indonesian law Setiyono, Setiyono; Keumala, Dinda; Sabirin, Ahmad; Rahmat, Nur Ezan; Suzaini, Syaqila Binte; Bayuaji, Anandayu Pavita
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v15i1.a28385

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: The history of the formation of the LAPS SJK is based on the importance of consumer protection in the financial services sector. According to the law concerning the role of the Financial Service Authority, the institution is given the authority to facilitate the settlement of complaints from consumers who are harmed by the finance actors. The OJK then issued regulation (POJK) Number 1/POJK.07/2014 concerning Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK) which was later replaced by regulation Number 61/POJK.07/2020.Purpose/Objective Study: This research examines, how is the history of the LAPS SJK formation and how is the legal politics of the formation.Design/methodology/Approach: This research is normative, using a historical approach. It applies a descriptive method with the secondary data.Findings: The interesting finding is that the establishment of LAPS SJK is to protect consumers in the event of a dispute with the financial actors, so the legal politics regulating the LASP SJK should be an integrated part of the political scheme of consumer protection law. Institutionally, the legal politics of establishing LAPS SJK is motivated by 3 (three) reasons. The initial reason is the establishment of OJK which has a determinant role and function to supervise integrated financial services business activities for the capital market, banking, and non-banking sectors. Another reason is the reality of the advanced development of technology in the global financial services sector, and the last reason is the need of the parties involved in the financial services sector industry; both consumers and finance actors who need an ideal non-court dispute resolution institution.Paper Type: Research Article
Co-Authors Bayuaji, Anandayu Pavita Budi, Kukuh Pramono Dinda Keumala Ghansham Anand Nugraha, Xavier Sabirin, Ahmad Septiningrum, Shintya Yulfa Setiyono Setiyono Suzaini, Syaqila Binte